Kodak EasyShare C875

5x, f/2.8, 37 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Kodak C875

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 12
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 5x
        Screen size
        Help 2.5"
        Aperture
        Help f/2.8
        Screen resolution
        Help Unknown
        Wide angle
        Help 37 mm
        Movie format
        Help 480p @ 30fps
        see all specifications
        Kodak EasyShare C875Kodak EasyShare C875

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Kodak EasyShare C875.

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Kodak C875 vs other recent compacts

        Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
        Usually standard
        Zoom Above average zoom Help
        5x

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Kodak C875 vs other recent compacts

        Movie format Low resolution movies Help
        480p @ 30fps
        Size Slightly large Help
        Compact (91×63×37 mm)
        Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        800 ISO
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        8 MP
        Announced Old Help
        August 2006
        Weight Heavy Help
        225 g
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        37 mm
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        Touch screen No touch screen Help
        More buttons
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Thickness Thick Help
        1.5"
        Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
        1/1600 of a second

        Appearance

        front photo of the Kodak EasyShare C875back photo of the Kodak EasyShare C875angle photo of the Kodak EasyShare C875

        Discussion

        Kodak EasyShare C875
        EasyShare C875
        Kodak

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments