As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare C533 is also often compared to super zooms. The Kodak EasyShare C533's top rivals come from Samsung (such as the ST65) and Kodak (such as the EasyShare C340)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak C533 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.9).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 27 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 2.7"), is much larger (compact (91×66×35 mm) vs super compact (92×56×22 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital) and is older (february 2006 vs february 2011).

Samsung ST65

Samsung ST65
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the ST65 (vs the C533)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (92×56×22 mm) vs Compact (91×66×35 mm)
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.8"
  • Much better wide angle: 27 mm vs 37 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ST65 (vs the C533)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the ST65 and C533

  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×56×22 mm) vs Compact (91×66×35 mm)
  • Light weight: 109 g vs 200 g
  • Viewfinders: Digital vs Tunnel

Kodak EasyShare C340

Kodak EasyShare C340
1 year older
$180

Significant advantages of the C340 (vs the C533)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 34 mm vs 37 mm

Significant disadvantages of the C340 (vs the C533)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 1.6" vs 1.8"

common strengths of the C340 and C533

  • Wide aperture: f/2.7 vs f/2.7
  • Fairly small: Compact (92×65×35 mm) vs Compact (91×66×35 mm)
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 200 g

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak C533 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3), is slightly smaller (compact (91×66×35 mm) vs prosumer size (114×78×95 mm)), is thinner (1.4" vs 3.7"), is slightly lighter (200 g vs 541 g) and has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 23 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500
10 years newer
$242 - $257

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the C533)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.8"
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 37 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the C533)

  • Significantly thicker: 3.7" vs 1.4"
  • Heavier: 541 g vs 200 g
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the Coolpix B500 and C533

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×78×95 mm) vs Compact (91×66×35 mm)
  • Light weight: 541 g vs 200 g
  • Thin: 3.7" vs 1.4"