As well as being compared against other compacts, the Kodak EasyShare C533 is also often compared to digicams. The Kodak EasyShare C533's top rivals come from Samsung (such as the ST65 and the ST66)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak C533 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.7 vs f/3.9).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 20fps vs 720p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 27 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 2.7"), is significantly larger (compact (91×66×35 mm) vs super compact (92×56×22 mm)) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital).

Samsung ST65

Samsung ST65
5 years newer
$130

Significant advantages of the ST65 (vs the C533)

  • Much better wide angle: 27 mm vs 37 mm
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.8"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ST65 (vs the C533)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/2.7

common strengths of the ST65 and C533

  • Viewfinders: Digital vs Tunnel

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak C533 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (37 mm vs 25 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 2.7"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), is older (february 2006 vs january 2012) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1400 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

Samsung ST66

Samsung ST66
5 years newer
$180

Significant advantages of the ST66 (vs the C533)

  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.8"
  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 37 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ST66 (vs the C533)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the ST66 and C533

  • None found