Kodak EasyShare C533

3x, f/2.7, 37 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Kodak C533

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 7
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 3x
        Screen size
        Help 1.8"
        Aperture
        Help f/2.7
        Screen resolution
        Help Unknown
        Wide angle
        Help 37 mm
        Movie format
        Help 480p @ 20fps
        see all specifications
        Kodak EasyShare C533Kodak EasyShare C533

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Kodak EasyShare C533.

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Kodak C533 vs other recent compacts

        Aperture Wide aperture Help
        f/2.7
        Weight Light Help
        200 g
        Size Quite small Help
        Compact (91×66×35 mm)
        Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
        Tunnel

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Kodak C533 vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        3x
        Screen size Very small screen Help
        1.8"
        Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        400 ISO
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
        1/1400 of a second
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        37 mm
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Announced Old Help
        February 2006
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        4 seconds

        Appearance

        front photo of the Kodak EasyShare C533back photo of the Kodak EasyShare C533angle photo of the Kodak EasyShare C533

        Discussion

        Kodak EasyShare C533
        EasyShare C533
        Kodak

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments