As well as being compared against other digicams, the Kodak EasyShare C300 is also often compared to pro DSLRs, entry-level DSLRs and mirrorless. The Kodak EasyShare C300's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix 2650) and Nikon (such as the D7100 and the D800)

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak C300 compared to other digicam competitors include: it is newer (february 2005 vs august 2002) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2300 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

Fujifilm FinePix 2650

Placeholder
2 years older

Significant advantages of the 2650 (vs the C300)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the 2650 (vs the C300)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 1/2300 of a second

common strengths of the 2650 and C300

  • Light weight: 235 g vs 198 g
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Nikon D800

Nikon D800
6 years newer
$1,299 - $1,879 (body only)
$3,464 24-85mm lens

Significant advantages of the D800 (vs the C300)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the D800 (vs the C300)

  • None found

common strengths of the D800 and C300

  • None found

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Nikon D7100

Nikon D7100
8 years newer
$709 (body only)
$1,097 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7100 (vs the C300)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the D7100 (vs the C300)

  • None found

common strengths of the D7100 and C300

  • None found

Canon Rebel T2i

Canon EOS Rebel T2i
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the T2i (vs the C300)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the T2i (vs the C300)

  • None found

common strengths of the T2i and C300

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak C300 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is significantly smaller (mid size (104×62×40 mm) vs professional size (133×93×82 mm)), is thinner (1.6" vs 3.2") and is significantly lighter (198 g vs 550 g).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (1.5" vs 3"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't have a screen which flips out and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3
7 years newer
$698 (body only)

Significant advantages of the DMC-GH3 (vs the C300)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.5"
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GH3 (vs the C300)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size (133×93×82 mm) vs Mid size (104×62×40 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.2" vs 1.6"
  • Significantly heavier: 550 g vs 198 g

common strengths of the DMC-GH3 and C300

  • Inexpensive: $698.49 vs $119.72
  • Each has a built-in flash