The Kodak DC265 is mostly gets compared to compacts. The Kodak DC265's top rivals come from Kodak (such as the EasyShare V1233)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak DC265 compared to compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none) and supports an external flash.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2" vs 2.5"), is much larger (prosumer size (118×57×106 mm) vs compact (102×55×23 mm)), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 3,200 ISO), is older (february 1999 vs august 2007) and is thicker (4.2" vs 0.9").

Kodak EasyShare V1233

Kodak EasyShare V1233
8 years newer

Significant advantages of the V1233 (vs the DC265)

  • Much smaller: Compact (102×55×23 mm) vs Prosumer size (118×57×106 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 4.2"
  • Much larger screen: 2.5" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the V1233 (vs the DC265)

  • No external flash support
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the V1233 and DC265

  • None found