As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Kodak PixPro FZ151 is also often compared to compacts, ultra compacts, super zooms and digicams. The Kodak PixPro FZ151's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix A100 and the Coolpix A10) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-W830 and the Cyber-shot DSC-W380)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak FZ151 compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 35 mm).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), has a slightly shorter battery life (210 shots vs 350 shots) and is older (july 2013 vs january 2015).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
6 months newer
$117 - $118

Significant advantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W830 and FZ151

  • Very inexpensive: $117.39 vs $178.07

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS
1 year newer
$158

Significant advantages of the ELPH 170 IS (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 170 IS (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 170 IS and FZ151

  • Very inexpensive: $158.32 vs $178.07

Kodak EasyShare Z950

Kodak EasyShare Z950
4 years older

Significant advantages of the Z950 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/1250 of a second vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Z950 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 24 mm

common strengths of the Z950 and FZ151

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10
1 year newer
$330

Significant advantages of the DMC-SZ10 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-SZ10 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-SZ10 and FZ151

  • Inexpensive: $329.95 vs $178.07

Nikon Coolpix A300

Nikon Coolpix A300
2 years newer
$99

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

common strengths of the Coolpix A300 and FZ151

  • Very inexpensive: $99.00 vs $178.07

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45
1 year newer
$552

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS45 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS45 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-ZS45 and FZ151

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak FZ151 compared to compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 30 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7") and has better image stabilization (lens vs digital).

However, on average it is slightly larger (compact (108×60×31 mm) vs compact (90×61×26 mm)), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), has a slightly shorter battery life (210 shots vs 250 shots), is older (july 2013 vs january 2015) and is thicker (1.2" vs 0.8").

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100
2 years newer
$100

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 1.2"

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the FZ151)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Coolpix A100 and FZ151

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.2"
  • Light weight: 119 g vs 180 g

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930
4 years older
$272

Significant advantages of the DSC-S930 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Smaller: Compact (90×61×26 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Thinner: 1" vs 1.2"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-S930 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.4" vs 3"

common strengths of the DSC-S930 and FZ151

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Thin: 1" vs 1.2"

Nikon Coolpix A10

Nikon Coolpix A10
2 years newer
$87 - $88

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the FZ151)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Coolpix A10 and FZ151

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Light weight: 160 g vs 180 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.2"

Nikon Coolpix S2900

Nikon Coolpix S2900
1 year newer
$261

Significant advantages of the S2900 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 1.2"

Significant disadvantages of the S2900 (vs the FZ151)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the S2900 and FZ151

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.2"
  • Light weight: 119 g vs 180 g

Nikon Coolpix L32

Nikon Coolpix L32
1 year newer
$199

Significant advantages of the L32 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much longer battery life: 320 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L32 (vs the FZ151)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the L32 and FZ151

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.2"

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
1 year newer
$150

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 24 mm
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens
  • Lower true resolution: 5.7 MP vs 9.8 MP

common strengths of the S33 and FZ151

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.2"
  • Inexpensive: $149.98 vs $178.07

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak FZ151 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 38 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none) and is newer (july 2013 vs january 2010).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.6), is significantly larger (compact (108×60×31 mm) vs ultra compact (50×22×54 mm)), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and has a slightly shorter battery life (210 shots vs 240 shots).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380
3 years older
$230

Significant advantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W380 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W380 and FZ151

  • None found

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800
7 months newer
$80 - $105

Significant advantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W800 and FZ151

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
1 year older
$120

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and FZ151

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S210

Nikon Coolpix S210
5 years older

Significant advantages of the S210 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S210 (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

common strengths of the S210 and FZ151

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak FZ151 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), is slightly smaller (compact (108×60×31 mm) vs professional size (125×85×107 mm)), is newer (july 2013 vs march 2009) and is thinner (1.2" vs 3.7").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.9), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and has a much shorter battery life (210 shots vs 390 shots).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ10

Placeholder
9 years older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ10 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ10 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 24 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (87×139×106 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)

common strengths of the DMC-FZ10 and FZ151

  • Fairly small: Professional size (87×139×106 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Light weight: 550 g vs 180 g
  • Thin: 4.2" vs 1.2"

Kodak PixPro AZ361

Kodak PixPro AZ361
3 months older
$160

Significant advantages of the AZ361 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the AZ361 (vs the FZ151)

  • Thicker: 3" vs 1.2"

common strengths of the AZ361 and FZ151

  • Very small: Prosumer size (113×82×77 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Very light: 416 g vs 180 g
  • Thin: 3" vs 1.2"

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500
2 years newer
$242 - $257

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Much longer battery life: 600 shots vs 210 shots
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the FZ151)

  • Significantly thicker: 3.7" vs 1.2"
  • Significantly heavier: 541 g vs 180 g

common strengths of the Coolpix B500 and FZ151

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×78×95 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Light weight: 541 g vs 180 g
  • Thin: 3.7" vs 1.2"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1
8 years older
$504

Significant advantages of the DSC-H1 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/1000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H1 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • Lower true resolution: 5 MP vs 9.8 MP

common strengths of the DSC-H1 and FZ151

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (108×81×92 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 1.2"
  • Light weight: 591 g vs 180 g

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1
4 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX1 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX1 (vs the FZ151)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 3.6" vs 1.2"
  • Significantly heavier: 544 g vs 180 g

common strengths of the DSC-HX1 and FZ151

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (115×83×92 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Light weight: 544 g vs 180 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 1.2"

Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700
2 years newer
$339 - $459

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B700 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B700 (vs the FZ151)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size (125×85×107 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 4.2" vs 1.2"
  • Significantly heavier: 565 g vs 180 g

common strengths of the Coolpix B700 and FZ151

  • Fairly small: Professional size (125×85×107 mm) vs Compact (108×60×31 mm)
  • Light weight: 565 g vs 180 g
  • Thin: 4.2" vs 1.2"

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Kodak FZ151 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 38 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 1.8"), has better image stabilization (lens vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 3.1 MP) and is newer (july 2013 vs august 2002).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and has a slower max shutter speed (4 seconds vs 1/2000 of a second).

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera
1 year older
$88

Significant advantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the FZ151)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the FZ151)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Instant Digital Camera and FZ151

  • Inexpensive: $86.99 vs $178.07

Fujifilm FinePix 3800

Fujifilm FinePix 3800
11 years older

Significant advantages of the 3800 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 3800 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 24 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3"

common strengths of the 3800 and FZ151

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
3 years newer
$99 - $157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 4 seconds
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the FZ151)

  • Much worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 24 mm
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Lens

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and FZ151

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 180 g
  • Inexpensive: $99.00 vs $178.07