Summary Kodak AZ521

Prices Price
Camera only
$199 - $220
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#14 of 16
Among similar cameras
#27 of 31
Specifications Key specs
Help 52x
Screen size
Help 3.0"
Help f/2.9
Screen resolution
Help 460k dots
Wide angle
Help 24 mm
Movie format
Help 1080p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Kodak PixPro AZ521


Report a correction

The Kodak AZ521 vs other recent digicams

Sensor type CMOS Sensor Help
Better in low light
HDR In-camera HDR Help
Combines multiple exposures
Macro focus Good macro Help
1 cm
Zoom Great zoom Help
Panorama In-camera panoramas Help
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama


Report a correction

The Kodak AZ521 vs other recent digicams

Size Slightly large Help
Prosumer size 118x85x97 mm
Thickness Thick Help
Supports RAW No RAW support Help
Less editing fidelity
Weight Heavy Help
551 g
Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
460k dots
Supports 24p No 24p movies Help
Missing that film look
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
3,200 ISO
Announced Old Help
July, 2013
Report a correction

The Kodak AZ521 vs other recent super zooms

Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Battery life Shorter battery life Help
240 shots
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users


angle photo of the Kodak PixPro AZ521


PixPro AZ521

Report a correction

Showing 5 comments

Avatar for Cocknob Cocknob (9:23 AM, December 25, 2013)
That's because it is cheap u tit
Avatar for Kapers Kapers (9:19 PM, December 15, 2013)
I opened the box to find the contents so poorly packed that the CD was warped. The initial impression of the device was that it looked and felt cheap. (hence the $199.00 cost). Everything was plastic. Instead of a touch screen it had old, mechanical push buttons that felt like they would pop out of the camera if I pushed them too hard. The quality of the picture wasnt much different from what I get on my cell phone. The digital zoom was fuzzy and unstable. (worthless) I suppose the good aspects would be that when it breaks, your not out of much money. However, Im not sure about you, but I do not have $199 to throw away.
Avatar for Sajjad Khalid Sajjad Khalid (0:20 PM, August 27, 2013)
I think APS-C sensor is writen mistakenly with this camera. Kindly review. See this link
Scoot (11:19 AM, July 24, 2013)
With this massive zoom it would be difficult enough to hold it steady even WITH an eye level viewfinder. As it doesn't have one, it would be about as much use as a chocolate fireguard to me :).
Avatar for deejayspop deejayspop (5:46 PM, July 14, 2013)
Where can I get one ????