HP Photosmart R837

3x, f/3.5, 39 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary HP R837

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 10
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 3x
        Screen size
        Help 3"
        Aperture
        Help f/3.5
        Screen resolution
        Help Unknown
        Wide angle
        Help 39 mm
        Movie format
        Help 640 x 40 @ 24fps
        see all specifications
        HP Photosmart R837HP Photosmart R837

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the HP Photosmart R837.

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The HP R837 vs other recent compacts

        Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
        Usually standard
        Screen size Above average sized screen Help
        3"

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The HP R837 vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        3x
        Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
        Risk of blur
        Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        400 ISO
        True resolution Lower true resolution Help
        7.2 MP
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Thickness Thick Help
        2.5"
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        39 mm
        Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
        None
        Touch screen No touch screen Help
        More buttons
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Announced Old Help
        March 2007
        Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
        None

        Appearance

        front photo of the HP Photosmart R837back photo of the HP Photosmart R837angle photo of the HP Photosmart R837

        Discussion

        HP Photosmart R837
        Photosmart R837
        HP

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments