As well as being compared against other compacts, the HP Photosmart M537 is also often compared to ultra compacts. The HP Photosmart M537's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot S110) and Casio (such as the Exilim EX-Z33)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, compared to other compact competitors the HP M537 has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), is much larger (compact (96×31×64 mm) vs compact (99×59×27 mm)) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
5 years newer
$439

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the M537)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the M537)

  • None found

common strengths of the S110 and M537

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/2.8
  • Very small: Compact (99×59×27 mm) vs Compact (96×31×64 mm)
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 192 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, compared to ultra compact competitors the HP M537 has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 35 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.5" vs 3"), is much larger (compact (96×31×64 mm) vs ultra compact (95×56×18 mm)), takes slightly lower resolution photos (6.1 MP vs 9.8 MP) and is older (march 2007 vs august 2009).

Casio Exilim EX-Z33

Casio Exilim EX-Z33
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the M537)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the M537)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-Z33 and M537

  • None found