The HP Photosmart 320 is mostly gets compared to compacts. The HP Photosmart 320's top rivals come from HP (such as the Photosmart M525)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, compared to compact competitors the HP Photosmart 320 has a significantly smaller screen (1.5" vs 1.7"), is much larger (mid size (113×44×69 mm) vs compact (95×31×62 mm)), takes slightly lower resolution photos (2 MP vs 6 MP), is older (july 2002 vs january 2006) and is thicker (2.7" vs 2.4").

HP Photosmart M525

HP Photosmart M525
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the M525 (vs the Photosmart 320)

  • Much smaller: Compact (95×31×62 mm) vs Mid size (113×44×69 mm)
  • Significantly larger screen: 1.7" vs 1.5"
  • Significantly thinner: 2.4" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the M525 (vs the Photosmart 320)

  • None found

common strengths of the M525 and Photosmart 320

  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel