The Fujifilm MX-700 is mostly gets compared to super zooms, travel zooms and compacts. The Fujifilm MX-700's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix L830 and the Coolpix S2700) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix T550)

Competitor classes

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm MX-700 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (mid size (80×101×33 mm) vs prosumer size (111×76×91 mm)), is thinner (1.3" vs 3.6"), is slightly lighter (260 g vs 508 g) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 22 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2" vs 3"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (1.3 MP vs 9.7 MP).

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
16 years newer
$244

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the MX-700)

  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the MX-700)

  • Significantly thicker: 3.6" vs 1.3"
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the L830 and MX-700

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Mid size (80×101×33 mm)
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 1.3"
  • Light weight: 508 g vs 260 g

Olympus C-700 UZ

Placeholder
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the C-700 UZ (vs the MX-700)

  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the C-700 UZ (vs the MX-700)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2"
  • Thicker: 3.1" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the C-700 UZ and MX-700

  • Very small: Standard size (108×76×78 mm) vs Mid size (80×101×33 mm)
  • Very light: 340 g vs 260 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.3"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm MX-700 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), is much larger (mid size (80×101×33 mm) vs super compact (99×57×19 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and takes much lower resolution photos (1.3 MP vs 9.7 MP).

Fujifilm FinePix T550

Fujifilm FinePix T550
15 years newer

Significant advantages of the T550 (vs the MX-700)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much smaller: Super compact (99×57×19 mm) vs Mid size (80×101×33 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the T550 (vs the MX-700)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the T550 and MX-700

  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 1.3"
  • Light weight: 141 g vs 260 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm MX-700 compared to compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2" vs 2.7"), is much larger (mid size (80×101×33 mm) vs super compact (95×58×21 mm)), takes much lower resolution photos (1.3 MP vs 9.7 MP) and is older (february 1998 vs january 2013).

Nikon Coolpix S2700

Nikon Coolpix S2700
15 years newer
$241

Significant advantages of the S2700 (vs the MX-700)

  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much smaller: Super compact (95×58×21 mm) vs Mid size (80×101×33 mm)
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.7" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the S2700 (vs the MX-700)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the S2700 and MX-700

  • Each has a built-in flash