The Fujifilm MX-1200 is mostly gets compared to pro digicams, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs, waterproofs and compacts. The Fujifilm MX-1200's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX270 HS and the PowerShot ELPH 130 IS) and Sony (such as the Cybershot DSC-RX100)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm MX-1200 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is thinner (1.3" vs 1.4"), is slightly less expensive ($113.31 vs $403.11) and has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1" 13.2x8.8mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/4.5 vs f/1.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.6" vs 3") and is slightly larger (mid size (110×77×33 mm) vs compact (102×58×36 mm)).

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
12 years newer
$403 - $448

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the MX-1200)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/4.5
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Much larger sensor: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the MX-1200)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and MX-1200

  • Inexpensive: $403.11 vs $113.31

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm MX-1200 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (1x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 25 mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.5 vs f/3.2), has a much smaller screen (1.6" vs 3") and is significantly larger (mid size (110×77×33 mm) vs super compact (95×56×21 mm)).

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
13 years newer
$237

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the MX-1200)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.6"

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the MX-1200)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the SX270 HS and MX-1200

  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 1.3"
  • Light weight: 233 g vs 240 g
  • Very inexpensive: $236.76 vs $113.31

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS
13 years newer
$196

Significant advantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the MX-1200)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much smaller: Super compact (95×56×21 mm) vs Mid size (110×77×33 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the MX-1200)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 130 IS and MX-1200

  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 1.3"
  • Light weight: 133 g vs 240 g
  • Very inexpensive: $195.70 vs $113.31

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm MX-1200 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (mid size (110×77×33 mm) vs professional size (133×100×80 mm)), is slightly less expensive ($113.31 vs $337.37), is thinner (1.3" vs 3.1") and is significantly lighter (240 g vs 570 g).

However, on average it doesn't record movies (none vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (1.6" vs 3"), takes much lower resolution photos (1.2 MP vs 18 MP), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (none vs 3.7 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5
14 years newer
$337 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the MX-1200)

  • Much higher true resolution: 18 MP vs 1.2 MP
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.6"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Tunnel

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the MX-1200)

  • Much larger: Professional size (130×100×78 mm) vs Mid size (110×77×33 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.3"
  • Significantly heavier: 480 g vs 240 g

common strengths of the Rebel T5 and MX-1200

  • Inexpensive: $337.37 vs $113.31

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
11 years newer

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the MX-1200)

  • Much higher true resolution: 17.9 MP vs 1.2 MP
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.6"
  • Has a through-the-lens viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Tunnel

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the MX-1200)

  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Mid size (110×77×33 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.3"
  • Much heavier: 570 g vs 240 g

common strengths of the T3i and MX-1200

  • None found

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm MX-1200 compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.5 vs f/3.3), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.6" vs 3"), is slightly larger (mid size (110×77×33 mm) vs compact (110×67×29 mm)) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS6

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS6
15 years newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS6 (vs the MX-1200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS6 (vs the MX-1200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-TS6 and MX-1200

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, compared to compact competitors the Fujifilm MX-1200 has a significantly narrower aperture (f/4.5 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (1.6" vs 2.5"), is much larger (mid size (110×77×33 mm) vs compact (90×57×26 mm)) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens).

Canon PowerShot SD850 IS

Canon PowerShot SD850 IS
7 years newer

Significant advantages of the SD850 IS (vs the MX-1200)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/4.5
  • Much smaller: Compact (90×57×26 mm) vs Mid size (110×77×33 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the SD850 IS (vs the MX-1200)

  • None found

common strengths of the SD850 IS and MX-1200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

Fujifilm FinePix A400 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix A400 Zoom
6 years newer

Significant advantages of the A400 Zoom (vs the MX-1200)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/4.5
  • Much smaller: Compact (93×60×28 mm) vs Mid size (110×77×33 mm)
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/750 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the A400 Zoom (vs the MX-1200)

  • None found

common strengths of the A400 Zoom and MX-1200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel