Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts, super zooms and entry-level DSLRs. The Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the ELPH 300 HS and the PowerShot A3300 IS) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z90 and the Finepix F600 EXR)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z808EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), takes significantly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP), has a touch screen and has a slightly larger sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon ELPH 300 HS 6 months newer $149 - $179	Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9 Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the 300 HS and Z808EXR Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm Thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"
	Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z90 7 months newer $80	Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm common strengths of the Z90 and Z808EXR Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm Have touch screens Thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"
	Compare the Z90 vs the Z808EXR
Canon PowerShot A3300 IS 5 months newer $129	Significant advantages of the A3300 IS (vs the Z808EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Significantly better macro capability: 3 cm vs 8 cm Significant disadvantages of the A3300 IS (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the A3300 IS and Z808EXR None found
	Compare the Canon PowerShot A3300 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
Fujifilm FinePix XP170 1 year newer	Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Significantly larger: Compact 102x71x27 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm No touch screen common strengths of the XP170 and Z808EXR None found
	Compare the XP170 vs the Z808EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z700EXR 5 months older $242	Significant advantages of the Z700EXR (vs the Z808EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the Z700EXR (vs the Z808EXR) None found common strengths of the Z700EXR and Z808EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
	Compare the Z700EXR vs the Z808EXR
Canon PowerShot A3200 IS 5 months newer $122 - $207	Significant advantages of the A3200 IS (vs the Z808EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Significantly better macro capability: 3 cm vs 8 cm Significant disadvantages of the A3200 IS (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the A3200 IS and Z808EXR None found
	Compare the Canon PowerShot A3200 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z808EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 98x59x20 mm vs compact 103x59x32 mm), takes significantly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and has a slightly larger sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 15x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR 1 year newer $209 - $300	Significant advantages of the F600 EXR (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Has a GPS Significantly more zoom: 15x vs 5x Significant disadvantages of the F600 EXR (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Much larger: Compact 104x63x33 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm No touch screen common strengths of the F600 EXR and Z808EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
	Compare the Finepix F600 EXR vs the FinePix Z808EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR similar age	Significant advantages of the F305EXR (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Significantly more zoom: 15x vs 5x Significantly wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Significant disadvantages of the F305EXR (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly larger: Compact 103x59x32 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm No touch screen common strengths of the F305EXR and Z808EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
	Compare the F305EXR vs the Z808EXR
Sony Cybershot H70 7 months newer $180	Significant advantages of the H70 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm Can create panoramas in-camera Much faster max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second Significant disadvantages of the H70 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Compact 101x57x28 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm common strengths of the H70 and Z808EXR None found
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-H70 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
Fujifilm FinePix T300 7 months newer $139	Significant advantages of the T300 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/3.9 Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second Significant disadvantages of the T300 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the T300 and Z808EXR Fairly small: Compact 97x56x28 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm Light weight: 157 g vs 158 g
	Compare the T300 vs the Z808EXR
Samsung WB210 7 months newer $199	Significant advantages of the WB210 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Much wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9 Much higher resolution screen: 1,152k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the WB210 (vs the Z808EXR) Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm common strengths of the WB210 and Z808EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Compact 100x59x22 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Samsung WB210 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
Fujifilm FinePix T200 7 months newer $150	Significant advantages of the T200 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/3.9 Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second Significant disadvantages of the T200 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the T200 and Z808EXR Fairly small: Compact 97x56x28 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm Light weight: 151 g vs 158 g
	Compare the T200 vs the Z808EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z808EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), takes significantly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP), has a touch screen and has a slightly larger sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.6 fps vs 10 fps), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and significantly worse macro focusing (8 cm vs 1 cm).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 5 months newer $129	Significant advantages of the DMC-FH2 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9 Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH2 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the DMC-FH2 and Z808EXR None found
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 5 months older $248 - $332	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX5 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 8 cm Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX5 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly lower true resolution: 9.9 MP vs 10.6 MP Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm common strengths of the DSC-TX5 and Z808EXR Capture very high resolution images: 9.9 MP vs 10.6 MP Have touch screens
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
Samsung SH100 7 months newer $99	Significant advantages of the SH100 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm Significantly wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Significant disadvantages of the SH100 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm common strengths of the SH100 and Z808EXR Have touch screens
	Compare the Samsung SH100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 5 months newer	Significant advantages of the DMC-FH5 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9 Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FH5 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the DMC-FH5 and Z808EXR None found
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z808EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is much smaller (super compact 98x59x20 mm vs large 130x90x126 mm), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP), has a touch screen and has boost light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has way more less zoom (5x vs 30x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 320 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 5 months newer $299 - $302	Significant advantages of the HS20 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Significant disadvantages of the HS20 (vs the Z808EXR) Much larger: Large 130x90x126 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the HS20 and Z808EXR Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
	Compare the HS20 vs the Z808EXR
Nikon Coolpix P100 5 months older	Significant advantages of the P100 (vs the Z808EXR) Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Much more zoom: 26.1x vs 5x Significant disadvantages of the P100 (vs the Z808EXR) Much larger: Prosumer size 114x83x99 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the P100 and Z808EXR None found
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z808EXR compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a touch screen, is much smaller (super compact 98x59x20 mm vs prosumer size 127x96x78 mm) and is thinner (0.8" vs 3.1").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 16.1 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon D5100 8 months newer $500 - $597 (body only) $600 - $697 18-55mm lens	Significant advantages of the D5100 (vs the Z808EXR) Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection Significant disadvantages of the D5100 (vs the Z808EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Much larger: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm common strengths of the D5100 and Z808EXR Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Prosumer size 127x96x78 mm vs Super compact 98x59x20 mm
	Compare the Nikon D5100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR