As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z800EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z800EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot WX50) and Olympus (such as the FE-5010)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z800EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a touch screen and is newer (july 2010 vs january 2009).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs LensSensor shift), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.6 fps vs 12 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Olympus FE-5010

Olympus FE-5010
1 year older
$350

Significant advantages of the FE-5010 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the FE-5010 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the FE-5010 and Z800EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 130 g vs 158 g

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
8 months newer

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Shoots significantly faster: 12 fps vs 1.6 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z800EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z800EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX550

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX550
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX550 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX550 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-FX550 and Z800EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (95×57×22 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 167 g vs 158 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z800EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.6), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), is significantly larger (super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs ultra compact (92×52×19 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and much lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Z800EXR

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z800EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs compact (105×59×28 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.8" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), doesn't have a built-in GPS and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS
2 years newer
$196

Significant advantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Z800EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the ELPH 130 IS and Z800EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (95×56×21 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 133 g vs 158 g

Panasonic Lumix TZ30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30
1 year newer
$351

Significant advantages of the TZ30 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the TZ30 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the TZ30 and Z800EXR

  • Very small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZX3
5 months older
$352

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZX3 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 25 mm vs 35 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZX3 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (98×55×26 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-ZX3 and Z800EXR

  • Very small: Compact (98×55×26 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • Very light: 159 g vs 158 g
  • Very thin: 1" vs 0.8"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
3 years newer
$2,192

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 30x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z800EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact (111×64×34 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Z800EXR

  • Very small: Compact (111×64×34 mm) vs Super compact (98×59×20 mm)
  • Very light: 214 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 0.8"