The Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP is mostly gets compared to other waterproofs and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP10) and Canon (such as the PowerShot A480 and the ELPH 100 HS)

Competitor classes

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z33WP compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (2.7" vs 2.5").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and is older (february 2009 vs january 2012).

Fujifilm FinePix XP10

Fujifilm FinePix XP10
1 year newer
$160

Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the Z33WP)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the Z33WP)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP10 and Z33WP

  • None found

Canon PowerShot D10

Canon PowerShot D10
similar age

Significant advantages of the D10 (vs the Z33WP)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the D10 (vs the Z33WP)

  • None found

common strengths of the D10 and Z33WP

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix TS20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20
2 years newer
$568

Significant advantages of the TS20 (vs the Z33WP)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TS20 (vs the Z33WP)

  • None found

common strengths of the TS20 and Z33WP

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z33WP compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (2.7" vs 1.5"), is much smaller (super compact (92×60×21 mm) vs compact (92×62×31 mm)), is newer (february 2009 vs march 2008), is thinner (0.8" vs 1.2") and is slightly lighter (110 g vs 160 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.7 vs f/3), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Canon PowerShot A480

Canon PowerShot A480
similar age
$225

Significant advantages of the A480 (vs the Z33WP)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the A480 (vs the Z33WP)

  • Much larger: Compact (92×62×31 mm) vs Super compact (92×60×21 mm)
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the A480 and Z33WP

  • Very small: Compact (92×62×31 mm) vs Super compact (92×60×21 mm)
  • Very light: 140 g vs 110 g
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.8"

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the Z33WP)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the Z33WP)

  • Not waterproof
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 100 HS and Z33WP

  • Very small: Super compact (93×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (92×60×21 mm)
  • Very light: 140 g vs 110 g
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"

Canon PowerShot SD890 IS

Canon PowerShot SD890 IS
1 year older

Significant advantages of the SD890 IS (vs the Z33WP)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SD890 IS (vs the Z33WP)

  • Much larger: Compact (95×57×27 mm) vs Super compact (92×60×21 mm)
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"
  • Much heavier: 195 g vs 110 g

common strengths of the SD890 IS and Z33WP

  • Very small: Compact (95×57×27 mm) vs Super compact (92×60×21 mm)
  • Light weight: 195 g vs 110 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.8"

Olympus FE-115

Olympus FE-115
3 years older

Significant advantages of the FE-115 (vs the Z33WP)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the FE-115 (vs the Z33WP)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.7"
  • Much larger: Compact (88×63×39 mm) vs Super compact (92×60×21 mm)
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm

common strengths of the FE-115 and Z33WP

  • Fairly small: Compact (88×63×39 mm) vs Super compact (92×60×21 mm)
  • Very light: 160 g vs 110 g