As well as being compared against other digicams, the Fujifilm FinePix S602 Zoom is also often compared to pro digicams, super zooms, entry-level DSLRs and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix S602 Zoom's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S6000fd and the FinePix 6900 Zoom) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SD40)

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S602 Zoom compared to other digicam competitors include: it has more storage slots (2 vs 1).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (1.8" vs 2") and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/10000 of a second).

Fujifilm FinePix 6900 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix 6900 Zoom
10 months older

Significant advantages of the 6900 Zoom (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • Much larger screen: 2" vs 1.8"

Significant disadvantages of the 6900 Zoom (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • Has fewer storage slots: 1 vs 2

common strengths of the 6900 Zoom and S602 Zoom

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Support external flash
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Fujifilm FinePix S602Z Pro

Placeholder
9 months newer

Significant advantages of the S602Z Pro (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/10000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the S602Z Pro (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the S602Z Pro and S602 Zoom

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Multiple storage slots: 2 vs 2
  • Support external flash

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S602 Zoom compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has more storage slots (2 vs 1) and supports an external flash.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 2.5"), is older (january 2002 vs july 2006), has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/10000 of a second) and slightly shorter exposures (3 seconds vs 30 seconds).

Fujifilm FinePix S6000fd

Fujifilm FinePix S6000fd
4 years newer

Significant advantages of the S6000fd (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S6000fd (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the S6000fd and S602 Zoom

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix S20 Pro

Fujifilm FinePix S20 Pro
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the S20 Pro (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S20 Pro (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the S20 Pro and S602 Zoom

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S602 Zoom compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (35 mm vs 37 mm), has a much larger screen (1.8" vs 1.5"), has a marginally larger sensor (1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/3" 5.27x3.96mm), has more storage slots (2 vs 1) and supports an external flash.

However, on average it is older (january 2002 vs july 2003) and is slightly heavier (590 g vs 430 g).

Fujifilm FinePix S5000 Zoom

Placeholder
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the S5000 Zoom (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S5000 Zoom (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 1.8"
  • Has fewer storage slots: 1 vs 2
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the S5000 Zoom and S602 Zoom

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (113×81×79 mm) vs Prosumer size (121×82×97 mm)
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 590 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 3.8"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
8 years newer
$329 (body only)
$550 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the D3100 and S602 Zoom

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S602 Zoom compared to compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (35 mm vs 38 mm), shoots faster continuously (5 fps vs 1.6 fps), has a viewfinder (digital vs none), has more storage slots (2 vs 1) and supports an external flash.

However, on average it is much larger (prosumer size (121×82×97 mm) vs super compact (96×45×24 mm)), is older (january 2002 vs september 2006), is thicker (3.8" vs 0.9"), is much heavier (590 g vs 120 g) and slightly shorter exposures (3 seconds vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot SD40

Canon PowerShot SD40
4 years newer
$139

Significant advantages of the SD40 (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (96×45×24 mm) vs Prosumer size (121×82×97 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 3.8"
  • Much lighter: 120 g vs 590 g

Significant disadvantages of the SD40 (vs the S602 Zoom)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm
  • Has fewer storage slots: 1 vs 2
  • No external flash support

common strengths of the SD40 and S602 Zoom

  • None found