As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix S5700 Zoom is also often compared to pro digicams, entry-level DSLRs and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix S5700 Zoom's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the Finepix X10 and the FinePix S2950) and Nikon (such as the D3300 and the Coolpix A10)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, compared to other super zoom competitors the Fujifilm S5700 Zoom has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.5" vs 2.7"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Fujifilm FinePix S2950

Fujifilm FinePix S2950
4 years newer
$237

Significant advantages of the S2950 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the S2950 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the S2950 and S5700 Zoom

  • Very small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)
  • Very light: 437 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 3.2"

Fujifilm FinePix S1800

Fujifilm FinePix S1800
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the S1800 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the S1800 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the S1800 and S5700 Zoom

  • Very small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)
  • Very light: 337 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 3.2"

Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Fujifilm FinePix S1500
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the S1500 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 33 mm vs 38 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the S1500 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the S1500 and S5700 Zoom

  • Very small: Standard size (103×73×68 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)
  • Very light: 345 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 3.2"

Fujifilm FinePix S5100 Zoom

Placeholder
2 years older

Significant advantages of the S5100 Zoom (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the S5100 Zoom (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.5"

common strengths of the S5100 Zoom and S5700 Zoom

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (113×81×79 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)
  • Very light: 387 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 3.2"

Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900
8 years newer
$458 - $597

Significant advantages of the P900 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P900 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Significantly larger: Large (140×103×137 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 899 g vs 406 g
  • Significantly thicker: 5.4" vs 3.2"

common strengths of the P900 and S5700 Zoom

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix S4700

Fujifilm FinePix S4700
6 years newer
$441

Significant advantages of the S4700 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.5"

Significant disadvantages of the S4700 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the S4700 and S5700 Zoom

  • Fairly small: Professional size (122×93×100 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)
  • Light weight: 518 g vs 406 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 3.2"

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S5700 Zoom compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (2.5" vs 1.8").

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.75x4.31mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2), has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,228k dots) and doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 years newer
$750

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.5
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the X10 and S5700 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital

Konica Minolta DiMAGE A1

Placeholder
3 years older

Significant advantages of the DiMAGE A1 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the DiMAGE A1 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.5"

common strengths of the DiMAGE A1 and S5700 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
8 years newer
$650 - $898

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.75x4.31mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and S5700 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
3 years newer
$2,042

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the G12 and S5700 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital

Canon PowerShot S70

Placeholder
2 years older

Significant advantages of the S70 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Thinner: 1.5" vs 3.2"

Significant disadvantages of the S70 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.5"

common strengths of the S70 and S5700 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital

Canon PowerShot G5

Placeholder
3 years older
$899

Significant advantages of the G5 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.5
  • Significantly better wide angle: 35 mm vs 38 mm
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the G5 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.5"

common strengths of the G5 and S5700 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S5700 Zoom compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (2.5" vs 1.8") and is much smaller (prosumer size (106×76×81 mm) vs prosumer size (124×98×76 mm)).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (7.1 MP vs 24.2 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.5" 5.75x4.31mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.6mm).

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300
6 years newer
$473 (body only)
$399 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3300 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much higher true resolution: 24.2 MP vs 7.1 MP
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the D3300 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×98×76 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)

common strengths of the D3300 and S5700 Zoom

  • Light weight: 430 g vs 406 g

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT

Placeholder
2 years older
$400 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel XT (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much higher true resolution: 8 MP vs 7.1 MP
  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel XT (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.5"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 115k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (127×94×64 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)

common strengths of the Rebel XT and S5700 Zoom

  • Very small: Prosumer size (127×94×64 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S5700 Zoom compared to compact competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 27 mm), is much larger (prosumer size (106×76×81 mm) vs compact (96×59×29 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs digital), is older (february 2007 vs september 2010) and is thicker (3.2" vs 0.9").

Nikon Coolpix A10

Nikon Coolpix A10
9 years newer
$87 - $88

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much smaller: Compact (96×59×29 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 38 mm
  • Much thinner: 1.1" vs 3.2"

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the Coolpix A10 and S5700 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm FinePix E510 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix E510 Zoom
2 years older

Significant advantages of the E510 Zoom (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much smaller: Compact (101×61×33 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 38 mm
  • Much thinner: 1.3" vs 3.2"

Significant disadvantages of the E510 Zoom (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Smaller screen: 2" vs 2.5"

common strengths of the E510 Zoom and S5700 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital

Samsung ES30

Samsung ES30
3 years newer
$101

Significant advantages of the ES30 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • Much smaller: Compact (96×62×23 mm) vs Prosumer size (106×76×81 mm)
  • Much better wide angle: 27 mm vs 38 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 3.2"

Significant disadvantages of the ES30 (vs the S5700 Zoom)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the ES30 and S5700 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash