As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD is also often compared to travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S2950 and the FinePix S4000) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L120 and the Coolpix L810)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S2900HD compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (18x vs 24x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), lacks a built in panoramas and is older (july, 2010 vs february, 2011).

Fujifilm FinePix S2950

Fujifilm FinePix S2950
7 months newer
$159 - $160

Significant advantages of the S2950 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S2950 (vs the S2900HD)

  • None found

common strengths of the S2950 and S2900HD

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Light weight: 437 g vs 437 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 3.2"
arrow Compare the S2950 vs the S2900HD

Fujifilm FinePix S4000

Fujifilm FinePix S4000
7 months newer
$215

Significant advantages of the S4000 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 18x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S4000 (vs the S2900HD)

  • None found

common strengths of the S4000 and S2900HD

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the S4000 vs the S2900HD

Nikon Coolpix L120

Nikon Coolpix L120
6 months newer
$180 - $218

Significant advantages of the L120 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L120 (vs the S2900HD)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the L120 and S2900HD

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x77x78 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 437 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 3.2"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L120 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
5 months older

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the S2900HD)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the S2900HD)

  • None found

common strengths of the S2500HD and S2900HD

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 437 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 3.2"
arrow Compare the S2500HD vs the S2900HD

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810
1 year newer
$250 - $265

Significant advantages of the L810 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • More zoom: 25.4x vs 18x

Significant disadvantages of the L810 (vs the S2900HD)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the L810 and S2900HD

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x83 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 437 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 3.2"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L810 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Fujifilm FinePix S3200

Fujifilm FinePix S3200
7 months newer
$305

Significant advantages of the S3200 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S3200 (vs the S2900HD)

  • None found

common strengths of the S3200 and S2900HD

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the S3200 vs the S2900HD

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S2900HD compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none) and has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots), is significantly larger (prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs compact 105x59x34 mm) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
1 year newer
$128 - $179

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the S2900HD)

  • Significantly thinner: 1.8" vs 3.2"

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the S2900HD)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the SX150 IS and S2900HD

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS
similar age
$141 - $245

Significant advantages of the SX130 IS (vs the S2900HD)

  • Significantly thinner: 1.8" vs 3.2"

Significant disadvantages of the SX130 IS (vs the S2900HD)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the SX130 IS and S2900HD

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX130 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Olympus 620 UZ

Olympus SP-620 UZ
1 year newer
$249 - $294

Significant advantages of the 620 UZ (vs the S2900HD)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Mid size 106x69x40 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the 620 UZ (vs the S2900HD)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 620 UZ and S2900HD

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus SP-620 UZ vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
6 months newer
$239 - $307

Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the S2900HD)

  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the S2900HD)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the SX230 HS and S2900HD

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Fujifilm FinePix T200

Fujifilm FinePix T200
7 months newer
$150

Significant advantages of the T200 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact 97x56x28 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Much thinner: 1.1" vs 3.2"
  • Much lighter: 151 g vs 437 g

Significant disadvantages of the T200 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the T200 and S2900HD

  • None found
arrow Compare the T200 vs the S2900HD

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v
5 months newer
$319 - $329

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the S2900HD)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX9v (vs the S2900HD)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 6,400 ISO
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DSC-HX9v and S2900HD

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S2900HD compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), is newer (july, 2010 vs july, 2009), is slightly smaller (prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs prosumer size 125x96x76 mm) and is slightly lighter (437 g vs 524 g).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 17.9 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.2 fps vs 3.7 fps) and has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs APS-C 23.2x15.4mm).

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200
1 year newer
$699 - $700 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3200 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.2x15.4mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D3200 (vs the S2900HD)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 125x96x76 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm

common strengths of the D3200 and S2900HD

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 125x96x76 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Light weight: 455 g vs 437 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D3200 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Canon Rebel T2i

Canon EOS Rebel T2i
5 months older
$544 - $949 (body only)
$649 - $867 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T2i (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.3x14.9mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much less shutter lag: 252 ms vs 720 ms
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the T2i (vs the S2900HD)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the T2i and S2900HD

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Very small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
arrow Compare the Canon EOS Rebel T2i vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Nikon D3000

Nikon D3000
1 year older
$487 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3000 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much less shutter lag: 262 ms vs 720 ms
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D3000 (vs the S2900HD)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps

common strengths of the D3000 and S2900HD

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Very small: Prosumer size 126x97x64 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
arrow Compare the Nikon D3000 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi
2 years older
$468 (body only)
$599 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel XSi (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 22.2x14.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much less shutter lag: 160 ms vs 720 ms
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel XSi (vs the S2900HD)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Does not take movies: None vs 720p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Rebel XSi and S2900HD

  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.0"
  • Very small: Prosumer size 129x98x62 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Light weight: 524 g vs 437 g
arrow Compare the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S2900HD compared to compact competitors include: it has way more more zoom (18x vs 5.6x), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), slightly closer macro focusing (2 cm vs 5 cm), has a viewfinder (digital vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.1 vs f/2.4), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and is much larger (prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs super compact 94x56x19 mm).

Sony Cybershot WX7

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7
7 months newer
$241 - $273

Significant advantages of the WX7 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 3.2"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the WX7 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much less zoom: 5.6x vs 18x
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the WX7 and S2900HD

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Sony Cybershot WX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10
7 months newer
$339 - $450

Significant advantages of the WX10 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 95x53x23 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 3.2"
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.1

Significant disadvantages of the WX10 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much less zoom: 7.6x vs 18x
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the WX10 and S2900HD

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD

Sony Cybershot W510

Sony Cybershot DSC-W510
7 months newer
$108 - $198

Significant advantages of the W510 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 96x54x19 mm vs Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.8" vs 3.2"
  • Much lighter: 119 g vs 437 g

Significant disadvantages of the W510 (vs the S2900HD)

  • Much less zoom: 4.4x vs 18x
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the W510 and S2900HD

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W510 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S2900HD