As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD is also often compared to pro DSLRs, pro digicams, entry-level DSLRs and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD's top rivals come from Canon (such as the EOS 60D and the Rebel T2i) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S1000fd and the FinePix S3400)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S2000HD compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 31 mm) and has better image stabilization (DigitalLens vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/2.8), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't have a screen which flips out and is older (august 2008 vs february 2011).

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd
6 months older
$359

Significant advantages of the S1000fd (vs the S2000HD)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.5
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the S1000fd (vs the S2000HD)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Digital
    2. Lens
  • Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 27 mm

common strengths of the S1000fd and S2000HD

  • Very small: Standard size (103×73×68 mm) vs Prosumer size (111×79×76 mm)
  • Very light: 325 g vs 426 g
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 3"

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810
3 years newer
$277

Significant advantages of the L810 (vs the S2000HD)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 27 mm
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the L810 (vs the S2000HD)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the L810 and S2000HD

  • Very small: Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm) vs Prosumer size (111×79×76 mm)
  • Very light: 430 g vs 426 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 3"

Fujifilm FinePix S3400

Fujifilm FinePix S3400
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the S3400 (vs the S2000HD)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the S3400 (vs the S2000HD)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Digital
    2. Lens

common strengths of the S3400 and S2000HD

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (118×81×100 mm) vs Prosumer size (111×79×76 mm)
  • Light weight: 540 g vs 426 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 3"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50
5 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-H50 (vs the S2000HD)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H50 (vs the S2000HD)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 31 mm vs 27 mm

common strengths of the DSC-H50 and S2000HD

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (116×81×86 mm) vs Prosumer size (111×79×76 mm)
  • Light weight: 547 g vs 426 g
  • Thin: 3.4" vs 3"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H9

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H9
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSC-H9 (vs the S2000HD)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.5
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H9 (vs the S2000HD)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 31 mm vs 27 mm

common strengths of the DSC-H9 and S2000HD

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×83×86 mm) vs Prosumer size (111×79×76 mm)
  • Very light: 440 g vs 426 g
  • Thin: 3.4" vs 3"

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S2000HD compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (DigitalLens vs none), is much smaller (prosumer size (111×79×76 mm) vs professional size (145×106×79 mm)), is thinner (3" vs 3.1") and is significantly lighter (426 g vs 755 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 17.9 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon EOS 60D

Canon EOS 60D
2 years newer
$555 (body only)

Significant advantages of the 60D (vs the S2000HD)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the 60D (vs the S2000HD)

  • Much larger: Professional size (145×106×79 mm) vs Prosumer size (111×79×76 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 755 g vs 426 g
  • Thicker: 3.1" vs 3"

common strengths of the 60D and S2000HD

  • Fairly small: Professional size (145×106×79 mm) vs Prosumer size (111×79×76 mm)
  • Light weight: 755 g vs 426 g
  • Built-in flashes

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S2000HD compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (2.7" vs 1.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (230k dots vs 114k dots), has image stabilization (DigitalLens vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 4.9 MP).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.5 vs f/1.8), doesn't support an external flash and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 16 seconds).

Olympus C-5050 Zoom

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the C-5050 Zoom (vs the S2000HD)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.5
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the C-5050 Zoom (vs the S2000HD)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 27 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Digital
    2. Lens
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the C-5050 Zoom and S2000HD

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S2000HD compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (DigitalLens vs none), is significantly smaller (prosumer size (111×79×76 mm) vs prosumer size (129×98×62 mm)) and is slightly lighter (426 g vs 530 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 17.9 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon Rebel T2i

Canon EOS Rebel T2i
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the T2i (vs the S2000HD)

  • Much higher true resolution: 17.9 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the T2i (vs the S2000HD)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Digital
    2. Lens
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (129×98×62 mm) vs Prosumer size (111×79×76 mm)

common strengths of the T2i and S2000HD

  • Very small: Prosumer size (129×98×62 mm) vs Prosumer size (111×79×76 mm)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S2000HD compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (27 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and is slightly larger (prosumer size (111×79×76 mm) vs mid size (108×64×38 mm)).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
4 years newer
$445

Significant advantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the S2000HD)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX50V (vs the S2000HD)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DSC-HX50V and S2000HD

  • None found