Summary Fujifilm S1600

Prices Price
Camera only $266
all S1600 prices
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range #n/a of 9 Among similar cameras #n/a of 33
details details
Specifications Key specs
Zoom Help 15x Screen size Help 3.0"
Aperture Help f/3.1 Screen resolution Help 230k dots
Wide angle Help 28 mm Movie format Help 720p @ 30fps
see all specifications

Also known as: Fujifilm FinePix S1770

Fujifilm FinePix S1600Fujifilm FinePix S1600

Videos

Pros

The Fujifilm S1600 vs other recent digicams

Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Digital
Macro focus Good macro Help
2 cm

The Fujifilm S1600 vs other recent super zooms

Thickness Thin Help
3.2"
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$265.73
Size Quite small Help
Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
Weight Very light Help
337 g

Cons

The Fujifilm S1600 vs other recent digicams

Movie format HD movies Help
720p @ 30fps
Size Slightly large Help
Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm
Thickness Thick Help
3.2"
Weight Heavy Help
337 g
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
8 seconds
Screen resolution Low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
1.3 fps
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Announced Old Help
February, 2010

The Fujifilm S1600 vs other recent super zooms

Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Supports RAW No RAW support Help
Less editing fidelity
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Zoom Very poor zoom Help
15x
Wide angle Poor wide angle lens Help
28 mm
Light sensitivity (boost) Lacks boost light sensitivity Help
None

Appearance

front photo of the Fujifilm FinePix S1600back photo of the Fujifilm FinePix S1600angle photo of the Fujifilm FinePix S1600

Discussion What do you think about the Fujifilm FinePix S1600?

Speech is free, but discussion at Snapsort is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of this camera here, and discuss feedback for Snapsort at our support community.

Showing 0 comments