As well as being compared against other super zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix S1500 is also often compared to pro digicams, entry-level DSLRs, travel zooms, digicams and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix S1500's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S1600 and the FinePix S1000fd) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L100 and the Coolpix L110)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S1500 compared to other super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.2), has a slightly larger screen (2.7" vs 2.0"), is slightly smaller (standard size 103x73x68 mm vs professional size 114x85x112 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 5 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (33 mm vs 28 mm), has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm), doesn't shoot RAW, is significantly more expensive ($461.96 vs $265.73) and doesn't support an external flash.

Fujifilm FinePix S1600

Fujifilm FinePix S1600
1 year newer
$266

Significant advantages of the S1600 (vs the S1500)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 33 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the S1600 (vs the S1500)

  • None found

common strengths of the S1600 and S1500

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Very light: 337 g vs 345 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 2.7"
arrow Compare the S1600 vs the S1500

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd
1 year older

Significant advantages of the S1000fd (vs the S1500)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S1000fd (vs the S1500)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the S1000fd and S1500

  • Very small: Standard size 102x73x67 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Very light: 325 g vs 345 g
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 2.7"
arrow Compare the S1000fd vs the S1500

Nikon Coolpix L100

Nikon Coolpix L100
similar age
$311

Significant advantages of the L100 (vs the S1500)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 33 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the L100 (vs the S1500)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the L100 and S1500

  • Fairly small: Standard size 110x72x78 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Light weight: 360 g vs 345 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 2.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Nikon Coolpix L110

Nikon Coolpix L110
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the L110 (vs the S1500)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 33 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the L110 (vs the S1500)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the L110 and S1500

  • Fairly small: Standard size 109x74x78 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Light weight: 406 g vs 345 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 2.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L110 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Fujifilm FinePix S9100

Fujifilm FinePix S9100
2 years older

Significant advantages of the S9100 (vs the S1500)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 33 mm
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the S9100 (vs the S1500)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 2.7"
  • Much larger: Large 128x93x129 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the S9100 and S1500

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the S9100 vs the S1500

Fujifilm FinePix S5200 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix S5200 Zoom
3 years older

Significant advantages of the S5200 Zoom (vs the S1500)

  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the S5200 Zoom (vs the S1500)

  • Much lower true resolution: 5 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.7"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 33 mm

common strengths of the S5200 Zoom and S1500

  • Light weight: 470 g vs 345 g
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the S5200 Zoom vs the S1500

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S1500 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is slightly less expensive ($461.96 vs $599.00).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2.0), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and has a much narrower wide angle lens (33 mm vs 28 mm).

Canon PowerShot G10

Canon PowerShot G10
5 months older

Significant advantages of the G10 (vs the S1500)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much higher true resolution: 14.6 MP vs 9.8 MP

Significant disadvantages of the G10 (vs the S1500)

  • None found

common strengths of the G10 and S1500

  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
2 years newer
$599

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the S1500)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/2.8

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the S1500)

  • None found

common strengths of the X10 and S1500

  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital
arrow Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix S1500

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S1500 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (2.7" vs 2.5"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), is much smaller (standard size 103x73x68 mm vs professional size 133x102x76 mm), is slightly less expensive ($461.96 vs $1,117.50) and is thinner (2.7" vs 3").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 16.1 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon D50

Nikon D50
3 years older
$1,118 (body only)

Significant advantages of the D50 (vs the S1500)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.7x15.5mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D50 (vs the S1500)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 2.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much larger: Professional size 133x102x76 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm

common strengths of the D50 and S1500

  • Thin: 3" vs 2.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon D50 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Nikon D60

Nikon D60
1 year older

Significant advantages of the D60 (vs the S1500)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D60 (vs the S1500)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 126x94x64 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm

common strengths of the D60 and S1500

  • Very small: Prosumer size 126x94x64 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Very thin: 2.5" vs 2.7"
  • Light weight: 522 g vs 345 g
arrow Compare the Nikon D60 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Sony SLT A65

Sony SLT-A65
2 years newer
$898 (body only)
$998 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the SLT A65 (vs the S1500)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.5x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.8 MP

Significant disadvantages of the SLT A65 (vs the S1500)

  • Much larger: Professional size 132x97x81 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Much heavier: 622 g vs 345 g
  • Much thicker: 3.2" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the SLT A65 and S1500

  • Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony SLT-A65 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000
1 year newer
$1,000 - $1,197 (body only)
$1,100 55-200mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7000 (vs the S1500)

  • Much larger sensor: APS-C 23.6x15.6mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the D7000 (vs the S1500)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much larger: Professional size 132x105x77 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Much heavier: 780 g vs 345 g

common strengths of the D7000 and S1500

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon D7000 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S1500 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.4), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 9 MP) and has a viewfinder (digital vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (33 mm vs 28 mm), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), is slightly larger (standard size 103x73x68 mm vs compact 103x59x36 mm) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS

Canon PowerShot SX130 IS
1 year newer
$141 - $245

Significant advantages of the SX130 IS (vs the S1500)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 33 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SX130 IS (vs the S1500)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the SX130 IS and S1500

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX130 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
2 years newer
$128 - $179

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the S1500)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 33 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the S1500)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.4 vs f/2.8
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the SX150 IS and S1500

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ5
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ5 (vs the S1500)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 33 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly thinner: 1.4" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ5 (vs the S1500)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the DMC-TZ5 and S1500

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ5 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H10

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H10
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DSC-H10 (vs the S1500)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H10 (vs the S1500)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 33 mm
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • Much lower true resolution: 8 MP vs 9.8 MP

common strengths of the DSC-H10 and S1500

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F
2 years newer
$179

Significant advantages of the WB150F (vs the S1500)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 33 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly smaller: Compact 106x59x23 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm

Significant disadvantages of the WB150F (vs the S1500)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the WB150F and S1500

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung WB150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S1500 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (33 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (2.7" vs 1.5"), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes much higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 3.9 MP) and is newer (february, 2009 vs january, 2002).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm) and doesn't support an external flash.

Nikon Coolpix 4300

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the 4300 (vs the S1500)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm

Significant disadvantages of the 4300 (vs the S1500)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.7"
  • Much lower true resolution: 3.9 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 33 mm

common strengths of the 4300 and S1500

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix 4300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Fujifilm FinePix S602 Zoom

Placeholder
7 years older

Significant advantages of the S602 Zoom (vs the S1500)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the S602 Zoom (vs the S1500)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.7"
  • Much lower true resolution: 6 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the S602 Zoom and S1500

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Good macro capabilities: 1 cm vs 2 cm
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
arrow Compare the S602 Zoom vs the S1500

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm S1500 compared to compact competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (12x vs 3x), has a slightly larger screen (2.7" vs 2.0"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes much higher resolution photos (9.8 MP vs 5 MP) and slightly closer macro focusing (2 cm vs 5 cm).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (33 mm vs 26 mm), is much larger (standard size 103x73x68 mm vs super compact 95x53x23 mm), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS) and has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm).

Nikon Coolpix 5900

Placeholder
4 years older

Significant advantages of the 5900 (vs the S1500)

  • Much smaller: Compact 88x60x37 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.2x5.3mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
  • Much thinner: 1.5" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the 5900 (vs the S1500)

  • Much lower true resolution: 5 MP vs 9.8 MP
  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 2.7"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 33 mm

common strengths of the 5900 and S1500

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Viewfinders: Tunnel vs Digital
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix 5900 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Sony Cybershot WX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10
2 years newer
$339 - $450

Significant advantages of the WX10 (vs the S1500)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 95x53x23 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 33 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 480p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX10 (vs the S1500)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the WX10 and S1500

  • Wide aperture: f/2.4 vs f/2.8
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Nikon Coolpix S3300

Nikon Coolpix S3300
2 years newer
$120

Significant advantages of the S3300 (vs the S1500)

  • Much smaller: Super compact 95x58x19 mm vs Standard size 103x73x68 mm
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 33 mm
  • Much thinner: 0.7" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the S3300 (vs the S1500)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8
  • Less zoom: 6x vs 12x
  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the S3300 and S1500

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S3300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix S1500