Summary Fujifilm S1500

Prices Price
Camera only
Unknown
Score Snapsort rank
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 4
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 12x
Screen size
Help 2.7"
Aperture
Help f/2.8
Screen resolution
Help 230k dots
Wide angle
Help 33 mm
Movie format
Help 480p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S1500Fujifilm FinePix S1500

gallery

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S1500.

Pros

Report a correction

The Fujifilm S1500 vs other recent digicams

Aperture Wide aperture Help
f/2.8
Viewfinder Doesn't use battery, see more detail Help
Digital
Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Report a correction

The Fujifilm S1500 vs other recent super zooms

Size Quite small Help
Standard size (103×73×68 mm)
Weight Light Help
345 g
Thickness Thin Help
2.7"

Cons

Report a correction

The Fujifilm S1500 vs other recent digicams

Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/2000 of a second
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.8 MP
Sensor size Slightly smaller than average sensor Help
1/2.3" 6.16x4.62mm
Announced Old Help
February 2009
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
8 seconds
Report a correction

The Fujifilm S1500 vs other recent super zooms

Zoom Poor zoom Help
12x
Screen size Below average sized screen Help
2.7"
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
33 mm
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Sensor shift
External flash No external flash Help
Less expandable

Appearance

front photo of the Fujifilm FinePix S1500back photo of the Fujifilm FinePix S1500angle photo of the Fujifilm FinePix S1500

Discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S1500
FinePix S1500
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments