As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR is also often compared to super zooms, pro digicams and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the ELPH 100 HS and the ELPH 300 HS) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F550 EXR and the FinePix F70EXR)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F80EXR compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP) and significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR
1 year newer
$196 - $255

Significant advantages of the F550 EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the F550 EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the F550 EXR and F80EXR

  • Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
arrow Compare the F550 EXR vs the F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR
6 months older
$223 - $450

Significant advantages of the F70EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 1,600 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the F70EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO
  • Lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the F70EXR and F80EXR

  • Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
arrow Compare the F70EXR vs the F80EXR

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
1 year newer
$219 - $304

Significant advantages of the SX230 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the SX230 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO
  • Lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the SX230 HS and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR
1 year newer
$233 - $331

Significant advantages of the F500 EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the F500 EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the F500 EXR and F80EXR

  • Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
arrow Compare the F500 EXR vs the F80EXR

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
1 year newer
$169 - $199

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the SX150 IS and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the F750 EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • More zoom: 20x vs 10x
  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the F750 EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the F750 EXR and F80EXR

  • Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
arrow Compare the F750 EXR vs the F80EXR

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F80EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (compact 99x59x28 mm vs large 130x90x126 mm), significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none), is thinner (1.1" vs 5"), is much lighter (210 g vs 730 g) and is slightly less expensive ($191.23 vs $310.00).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has much less zoom (10x vs 26x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix S3300

Fujifilm FinePix S3300
1 year newer
$283

Significant advantages of the S3300 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 26x vs 10x
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S3300 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 118x80x99 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Much thicker: 3.9" vs 1.1"
  • Lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the S3300 and F80EXR

  • Inexpensive: $283.10 vs $191.23
arrow Compare the S3300 vs the F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix S2950

Fujifilm FinePix S2950
1 year newer
$139 - $200

Significant advantages of the S2950 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2950 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Much thicker: 3.2" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the S2950 and F80EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 437 g vs 210 g
arrow Compare the S2950 vs the F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR
1 year newer
$310 - $475

Significant advantages of the HS20 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 10x
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the HS20 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 130x90x126 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Much thicker: 5" vs 1.1"
  • Much heavier: 730 g vs 210 g

common strengths of the HS20 and F80EXR

  • Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Inexpensive: $310.00 vs $191.23
arrow Compare the HS20 vs the F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix S200EXR

Fujifilm FinePix S200EXR
6 months older
$409

Significant advantages of the S200EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the S200EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 133x94x145 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 27 mm

common strengths of the S200EXR and F80EXR

  • Capture very high resolution images: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
arrow Compare the S200EXR vs the F80EXR

Nikon Coolpix P100

Nikon Coolpix P100
similar age

Significant advantages of the P100 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 26.1x vs 10x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the P100 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 114x83x99 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO
  • Much thicker: 3.9" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the P100 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F80EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (27 mm vs 35 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 1.8"), takes significantly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 6 MP), is newer (february, 2010 vs february, 2003) and significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 960 ISO).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.0), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
1 year newer
$414 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the F80EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and F80EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 210 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F700

Placeholder
7 years older

Significant advantages of the F700 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the F700 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.0"
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 27 mm
  • Much lower true resolution: 6 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the F700 and F80EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 108x54x28 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Light weight: 205 g vs 210 g
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"
arrow Compare the F700 vs the F80EXR

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
6 months newer
$369

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the F80EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the S95 and F80EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Very good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 210 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
7 months newer
$389 - $500

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"
  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO
  • Significantly heavier: 401 g vs 210 g

common strengths of the G12 and F80EXR

  • Inexpensive: $389.00 vs $191.23
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F80EXR compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (10x vs 4x), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP), significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), is slightly larger (compact 99x59x28 mm vs super compact 94x56x19 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$102 - $189

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 100 HS and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$125 - $233

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.3
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the 300 HS and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Sony Cybershot WX7

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7
1 year newer
$254 - $305

Significant advantages of the WX7 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.3
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the WX7 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the WX7 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
1 year older
$260

Significant advantages of the F200EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the F200EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the F200EXR and F80EXR

  • Capture extremely high resolution images: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Large sensors: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
arrow Compare the F200EXR vs the F80EXR

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS

Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS
similar age
$274

Significant advantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 3.0"
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SD3500 IS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the SD3500 IS and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Sony Cybershot W580

Sony Cybershot DSC-W580
1 year newer
$262 - $263

Significant advantages of the W580 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 94x56x19 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Has more storage slots: 2 vs 1

Significant disadvantages of the W580 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the W580 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W580 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR