Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR
Competitors
Travel zoom Travel zoom
February, 2010

As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR is also often compared to pro digicams, super zooms and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F70EXR and the FinePix F200EXR) and Canon (such as the ELPH 300 HS and the PowerShot SX150 IS)

Competitor classes

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F80EXR compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), takes significantly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 8.6 MP), has a marginally larger sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm) and much higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p, slightly worse macro focusing (5 cm vs 1 cm) and is older (february, 2010 vs august, 2011).

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR
6 months older
$186 - $289

Significant advantages of the F70EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 1,600 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the F70EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the F70EXR and F80EXR

  • Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
arrow Compare the F70EXR vs the F80EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
similar age
$361

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS7 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Worse boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the DMC-ZS7 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
1 year newer
$138 - $179

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 1 cm vs 5 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the SX150 IS and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
1 year newer
$195 - $196

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the 310 HS and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1
1 year older

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS1 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 8 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS1 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much lower true resolution: 8.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

common strengths of the DMC-ZS1 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Samsung HZ30W

Samsung HZ30W
similar age

Significant advantages of the HZ30W (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the HZ30W (vs the F80EXR)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the HZ30W and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Samsung HZ30W vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F80EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.0), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12
7 months newer
$390 - $496

Significant advantages of the G12 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the G12 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0"
  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the G12 and F80EXR

  • Inexpensive: $389.99 vs $339.62
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
1 year older
$555

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Worse boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 12,800 ISO

common strengths of the DMC-LX3 and F80EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 109x60x27 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
6 months newer
$340 - $389

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the S95 and F80EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Very good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 210 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100
1 year newer
$356 - $430

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the F80EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and F80EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Very good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
  • Light weight: 198 g vs 210 g
arrow Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Canon PowerShot G10

Canon PowerShot G10
1 year older

Significant advantages of the G10 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 14.6 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the G10 (vs the F80EXR)

  • No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO
  • Significantly heavier: 390 g vs 210 g

common strengths of the G10 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot G10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
2 years newer
$300 - $315

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the P310 and F80EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Light weight: 194 g vs 210 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.1"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P310 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F80EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (compact 99x59x28 mm vs prosumer size 118x80x99 mm), takes significantly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.6 MP), has a marginally larger sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2.5" 6.1x4.5mm), significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and is thinner (1.1" vs 3.7").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has much less zoom (10x vs 26x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 10x
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the Z990 MAX (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger: Professional size 124x86x93 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Much heavier: 589 g vs 210 g

common strengths of the Z990 MAX and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix S3300

Fujifilm FinePix S3300
1 year newer
$272

Significant advantages of the S3300 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 26x vs 10x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 27 mm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S3300 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger: Prosumer size 118x80x99 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Much thicker: 3.9" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the S3300 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the S3300 vs the F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix S2950

Fujifilm FinePix S2950
1 year newer
$153 - $159

Significant advantages of the S2950 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2950 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Much thicker: 3.2" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the S2950 and F80EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 437 g vs 210 g
arrow Compare the S2950 vs the F80EXR

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F80EXR compared to compact competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (10x vs 4x), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.8"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP), significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), is slightly larger (compact 99x59x28 mm vs super compact 95x57x19 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year newer
$148 - $179

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.3
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

common strengths of the 300 HS and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
1 year older
$293

Significant advantages of the F200EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the F200EXR (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the F200EXR and F80EXR

  • Capture extremely high resolution images: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Large sensors: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
arrow Compare the F200EXR vs the F80EXR

Canon ELPH 100 HS

Canon ELPH 100 HS
1 year newer
$103 - $189

Significant advantages of the 100 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
  • Supports 24p
  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3

Significant disadvantages of the 100 HS (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the 100 HS and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 100 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Sony Cybershot WX7

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7
1 year newer
$241

Significant advantages of the WX7 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.3
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the WX7 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

common strengths of the WX7 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Pentax Optio E80

Pentax Optio E80
6 months older
$113

Significant advantages of the E80 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
  • Significantly lighter: 145 g vs 210 g

Significant disadvantages of the E80 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 31 mm vs 27 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0"

common strengths of the E80 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Pentax Optio E80 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-W550

Sony Cybershot DSC-W550
1 year newer
$176 - $230

Significant advantages of the DSC-W550 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.3
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 95x57x19 mm vs Compact 99x59x28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W550 (vs the F80EXR)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

common strengths of the DSC-W550 and F80EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W550 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR