Summary Fujifilm F70EXR

Prices Price
Camera only
$412
Score Snapsort rank
Within its price range
#n/a of 3
Among similar cameras
#n/a of 8
Specifications Key specs
Zoom
Help 10x
Screen size
Help 2.7"
Aperture
Help f/3.3
Screen resolution
Help 230k dots
Wide angle
Help 27 mm
Movie format
Help 480p @ 30fps
see all specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F70EXRFujifilm FinePix F70EXR

gallery

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR.

Pros

Report a correction

The Fujifilm F70EXR vs other recent compacts

Built-in flash Built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Light sensitivity Good maximum light sensitivity Help
12,800 ISO
Report a correction

The Fujifilm F70EXR vs other recent travel zooms

Size Really small Help
Compact (99×59×23 mm)
Weight Light Help
205 g
Thickness Thin Help
0.9"
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$411.65

Cons

Report a correction

The Fujifilm F70EXR vs other recent compacts

Sensor type Sensor type Help
CCD
Fastest shutter speed Slow shutter speed Help
1/2000 of a second
Report a correction

The Fujifilm F70EXR vs other recent travel zooms

Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
27 mm
Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
230k dots
Image stabilization Image stabilization Help
  1. Sensor shift
Touch screen No touch screen Help
More buttons
Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
Less flexible
Sensor size Small sensor Help
1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
None
Popularity Not so popular Help
Among snapsort users
Zoom Poor zoom Help
10x
Screen size Below average sized screen Help
2.7"
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
12,800 ISO
True resolution Lower true resolution Help
9.8 MP
Autofocus contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
Announced Old Help
July 2009
Longest exposure Short exposures Help
8 seconds

Appearance

front photo of the Fujifilm FinePix F70EXRback photo of the Fujifilm FinePix F70EXRangle photo of the Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR

Discussion

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR
FinePix F70EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments