The Fujifilm FinePix F610 is mostly gets compared to pro DSLRs, super zooms and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix F610's top rivals come from Canon (such as the EOS 5D Mark IV and the PowerShot ELPH 180) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S4200)

Competitor classes

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
12 years newer
$2,219 - $2,999 (body only)
$2,558 - $3,899 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the F610)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the F610)

  • None found

common strengths of the 5D Mark IV and F610

  • None found

Nikon D810

Nikon D810
10 years newer
$1,999 - $2,797 (body only)
$2,583 - $3,297 24-120mm lens

Significant advantages of the D810 (vs the F610)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the D810 (vs the F610)

  • None found

common strengths of the D810 and F610

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F610 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.1), is slightly smaller (compact (72×93×31 mm) vs prosumer size (118×81×100 mm)), takes slightly higher resolution photos (12.3 MP vs 9.7 MP), is thinner (1.2" vs 3.9") and is slightly lighter (205 g vs 543 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 3"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and is older (november 2003 vs january 2012).

Fujifilm FinePix S4200

Fujifilm FinePix S4200
8 years newer

Significant advantages of the S4200 (vs the F610)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.8"
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Sensor shift
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S4200 (vs the F610)

  • Significantly thicker: 3.9" vs 1.2"
  • Heavier: 543 g vs 205 g

common strengths of the S4200 and F610

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (118×81×100 mm) vs Compact (72×93×31 mm)
  • Light weight: 543 g vs 205 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 1.2"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F610 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (12.3 MP vs 9.7 MP) and has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.8" vs 2.7"), is much larger (compact (72×93×31 mm) vs super compact (95×54×22 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and is older (november 2003 vs january 2016).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180
12 years newer
$118 - $119

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 180 (vs the F610)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (72×93×31 mm)
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.8"
  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 180 (vs the F610)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 180 and F610

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (72×93×31 mm)
  • Very light: 126 g vs 205 g
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1.2"