As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix F60fd is also often compared to boutiques and mirrorless. The Fujifilm FinePix F60fd's top rivals come from Ricoh (such as the GR) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F40fd and the FinePix F200EXR)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F60fd compared to other compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), is slightly smaller (compact (93×59×23 mm) vs compact (93×57×28 mm)), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 8.1 MP) and is newer (august 2008 vs january 2007).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm).

Fujifilm FinePix F40fd

Fujifilm FinePix F40fd
1 year older

Significant advantages of the F40fd (vs the F60fd)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F40fd (vs the F60fd)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the F40fd and F60fd

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Very small: Compact (96×59×23 mm) vs Compact (93×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the F200EXR (vs the F60fd)

  • Much better wide angle: 28 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the F200EXR (vs the F60fd)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the F200EXR and F60fd

  • Very small: Compact (98×59×23 mm) vs Compact (93×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 205 g vs 205 g

Fujifilm FinePix F31fd

Fujifilm FinePix F31fd
1 year older
$480

Significant advantages of the F31fd (vs the F60fd)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F31fd (vs the F60fd)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly larger: Compact (93×57×28 mm) vs Compact (93×59×23 mm)

common strengths of the F31fd and F60fd

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Very small: Compact (93×57×28 mm) vs Compact (93×59×23 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F60fd compared to boutique competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.4").

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 28 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,228k dots), has a marginally smaller sensor (1/1.7" 7.78x5.83mm vs APS-C 23.7x15.6mm), has a slightly shorter battery life (230 shots vs 290 shots) and is older (august 2008 vs april 2013).

Ricoh GR

Ricoh GR
4 years newer
$499

Significant advantages of the GR (vs the F60fd)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,228k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the GR (vs the F60fd)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the GR and F60fd

  • Fairly small: Compact (117×61×35 mm) vs Compact (93×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.4" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 245 g vs 205 g

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F60fd compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.3").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't have a touch screen, has a marginally smaller sensor (1/1.7" 7.78x5.83mm vs four thirds 17.3x13mm) and is older (august 2008 vs june 2011).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the F60fd)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GF3 (vs the F60fd)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the DMC-GF3 and F60fd

  • Fairly small: Compact (108×67×33 mm) vs Compact (93×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 264 g vs 205 g