Fujifilm FinePix F60fd

3x, f/2.8, 35 mm
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        Summary Fujifilm F60fd

        Prices Price
        Camera only
        Unknown
        Score Snapsort rank
        Among similar cameras
        #n/a of 1
        Specifications Key specs
        Zoom
        Help 3x
        Screen size
        Help 3"
        Aperture
        Help f/2.8
        Screen resolution
        Help 230k dots
        Wide angle
        Help 35 mm
        Movie format
        Help 480p @ 30fps
        see all specifications
        Fujifilm FinePix F60fdFujifilm FinePix F60fd

        gallery

        Explore our gallery of 7 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix F60fd.

        Pros

        Report a correction

        The Fujifilm F60fd vs other recent compacts

        Aperture Wide aperture Help
        f/2.8
        Thickness Thin Help
        0.9"
        Size Really small Help
        Compact (93×59×23 mm)
        Weight Light Help
        205 g

        Cons

        Report a correction

        The Fujifilm F60fd vs other recent compacts

        Zoom Below average zoom Help
        3x
        Screen resolution Very low resolution screen Help
        230k dots
        Screen flips out Fixed screen Help
        Less flexible
        Sensor type Sensor type Help
        CCD
        Viewfinder Can only preview photos on the screen Help
        None
        Popularity Not so popular Help
        Among snapsort users
        Wide angle Very poor wide angle lens Help
        35 mm
        Light sensitivity Very poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        1,600 ISO
        Battery life Shorter battery life Help
        230 shots
        Announced Old Help
        August 2008
        Longest exposure Short exposures Help
        8 seconds

        Appearance

        front photo of the Fujifilm FinePix F60fdback photo of the Fujifilm FinePix F60fdangle photo of the Fujifilm FinePix F60fd

        Discussion

        Fujifilm FinePix F60fd
        FinePix F60fd
        Fujifilm

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments