Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
Competitors

As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR is also often compared to pro digicams, super zooms and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F500 EXR and the FinePix F550 EXR) and Samsung (such as the WB700 and the WB150F)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F305EXR compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP), records movies in 24p, has a marginally larger sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm) and significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none).

However, on average it doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.5 fps vs 8 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR 5 months newer $225 - $281	Significant advantages of the F500 EXR (vs the F305EXR) Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None Has in-camera HDR Significant disadvantages of the F500 EXR (vs the F305EXR) No 24p support common strengths of the F500 EXR and F305EXR Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
	Compare the F500 EXR vs the F305EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR 5 months newer $248	Significant advantages of the F550 EXR (vs the F305EXR) Has a GPS Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None Significant disadvantages of the F550 EXR (vs the F305EXR) No 24p support common strengths of the F550 EXR and F305EXR Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
	Compare the F550 EXR vs the F305EXR
Samsung WB700 5 months newer $215	Significant advantages of the WB700 (vs the F305EXR) Significantly smaller: Compact 99x59x22 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Significantly thinner: 0.9" vs 1.3" Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second Significant disadvantages of the WB700 (vs the F305EXR) No 24p support Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO common strengths of the WB700 and F305EXR Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
	Compare the Samsung WB700 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
Samsung WB150F 1 year newer $179	Significant advantages of the WB150F (vs the F305EXR) Smaller: Compact 106x59x23 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Significantly thinner: 0.9" vs 1.3" Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second Significant disadvantages of the WB150F (vs the F305EXR) No 24p support Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm common strengths of the WB150F and F305EXR Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
	Compare the Samsung WB150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 6 months newer $328	Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the F305EXR) Has a GPS Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps Has a touch screen Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS10 (vs the F305EXR) No 24p support Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP Significantly smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm common strengths of the DMC-ZS10 and F305EXR Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
Canon PowerShot SX220 HS 6 months newer $281 - $366	Significant advantages of the SX220 HS (vs the F305EXR) Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD Significant disadvantages of the SX220 HS (vs the F305EXR) Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm Significantly lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 10.6 MP No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO common strengths of the SX220 HS and F305EXR Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
	Compare the Canon PowerShot SX220 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F305EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has slightly more zoom (15x vs 5x), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), records movies in 24p and significantly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.0), records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps) and has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots).

Canon PowerShot S95 similar age $364 - $389	Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the F305EXR) Shoots RAW Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3 Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the F305EXR) Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm Significantly lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the S95 and F305EXR Fairly small: Compact 99x58x29 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Very good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
Canon Powershot S100 1 year newer $372 - $430	Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the F305EXR) Shoots RAW Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3 Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the F305EXR) None found common strengths of the S100 and F305EXR Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm Fairly small: Compact 99x60x28 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
	Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
Nikon Coolpix P7100 1 year newer $450	Significant advantages of the P7100 (vs the F305EXR) Shoots RAW Much larger sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Has an external mic jack Significant disadvantages of the P7100 (vs the F305EXR) No 24p support Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm Significantly lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the P7100 and F305EXR None found
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P7100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
Nikon Coolpix P300 6 months newer $299	Significant advantages of the P300 (vs the F305EXR) Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3 Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the P300 (vs the F305EXR) No 24p support Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO common strengths of the P300 and F305EXR Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm Fairly small: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Light weight: 189 g vs 215 g
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F305EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), is much smaller (compact 103x59x32 mm vs professional size 123x92x108 mm) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has much less zoom (15x vs 30x), records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 5 months newer $299 - $302	Significant advantages of the HS20 (vs the F305EXR) Much more zoom: 30x vs 15x Has a flip-out screen Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps Significant disadvantages of the HS20 (vs the F305EXR) Much larger: Large 130x90x126 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm No 24p support Much heavier: 730 g vs 215 g common strengths of the HS20 and F305EXR Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
	Compare the HS20 vs the F305EXR
Fujifilm FinePix S2950 7 months newer $159 - $160	Significant advantages of the S2950 (vs the F305EXR) Can create panoramas in-camera Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None Faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second Significant disadvantages of the S2950 (vs the F305EXR) No 24p support Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm Significantly larger: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm common strengths of the S2950 and F305EXR Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Thin: 3.2" vs 1.3" Light weight: 437 g vs 215 g
	Compare the S2950 vs the F305EXR
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS 1 year older $682	Significant advantages of the SX20 IS (vs the F305EXR) Has a flip-out screen Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3 Significantly better macro capability: 0 cm vs 5 cm Significant disadvantages of the SX20 IS (vs the F305EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.0" Much larger: Prosumer size 128x88x87 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm No 24p support common strengths of the SX20 IS and F305EXR None found
	Compare the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
Canon Powershot SX40 1 year newer $347 - $380	Significant advantages of the SX40 (vs the F305EXR) Much more zoom: 35x vs 15x Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.3 Has a flip-out screen Significant disadvantages of the SX40 (vs the F305EXR) Much larger: Professional size 123x92x108 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0" Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the SX40 and F305EXR Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
	Compare the Canon Powershot SX40 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F305EXR compared to compact competitors include: it has much more zoom (15x vs 5x), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (24 mm vs 28 mm), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), records movies in 24p and slightly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), is significantly larger (compact 103x59x32 mm vs super compact 95x53x23 mm), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Fujifilm FinePix F100fd 2 years older	Significant advantages of the F100fd (vs the F305EXR) Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP Significantly smaller: Compact 98x59x23 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Significant disadvantages of the F100fd (vs the F305EXR) Significantly less zoom: 5x vs 15x Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm No 24p support common strengths of the F100fd and F305EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP Large sensors: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the F100fd vs the F305EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR 1 year older $293	Significant advantages of the F200EXR (vs the F305EXR) Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Much higher true resolution: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP Significantly smaller: Compact 98x59x23 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Significant disadvantages of the F200EXR (vs the F305EXR) Significantly less zoom: 5x vs 15x Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm No 24p support common strengths of the F200EXR and F305EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 12 MP vs 10.6 MP Large sensors: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the F200EXR vs the F305EXR
Fujifilm FinePix XP50 1 year newer $170 - $200	Significant advantages of the XP50 (vs the F305EXR) Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps Has in-camera HDR Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD Significant disadvantages of the XP50 (vs the F305EXR) Significantly less zoom: 5x vs 15x Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/3.3 Significantly worse wide angle: 28 mm vs 24 mm common strengths of the XP50 and F305EXR None found
	Compare the XP50 vs the F305EXR
Sony Cybershot WX10 7 months newer $339 - $450	Significant advantages of the WX10 (vs the F305EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.3 Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 24fps Significantly smaller: Super compact 95x53x23 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Significant disadvantages of the WX10 (vs the F305EXR) Significantly less zoom: 7.6x vs 15x No 24p support Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the WX10 and F305EXR Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR similar age	Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the F305EXR) Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 3.0" Significantly smaller: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Has a touch screen Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the F305EXR) Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 24 mm Significantly less zoom: 5x vs 15x Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.9 vs f/3.3 common strengths of the Z808EXR and F305EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm
	Compare the Z808EXR vs the F305EXR
Canon ELPH 300 HS 6 months newer $149 - $179	Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the F305EXR) Much smaller: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Compact 103x59x32 mm Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.3 Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the F305EXR) Significantly less zoom: 5x vs 15x Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0" Significantly lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the 300 HS and F305EXR Good wide angle: 24 mm vs 24 mm Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these
	Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR