As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR is also often compared to travel zooms and pro digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F100fd and the FinePix F305EXR) and Olympus (such as the Stylus Tough 8010 and the XZ-1)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is newer (february 2009 vs august 2008).

However, on average it is not waterproof and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

Fujifilm FinePix F100fd

Fujifilm FinePix F100fd
1 year older

Significant advantages of the F100fd (vs the F200EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F100fd (vs the F200EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the F100fd and F200EXR

  • Very small: Compact (98×59×23 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 210 g vs 205 g

Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
1 year newer
$600

Significant advantages of the Tough 8010 (vs the F200EXR)

  • Waterproof
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the Tough 8010 (vs the F200EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the Tough 8010 and F200EXR

  • Very small: Compact (95×62×22 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 215 g vs 205 g

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
1 year newer
$315

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the F200EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.3
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the F200EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact (100×58×30 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.2" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the S95 and F200EXR

  • Very small: Compact (100×58×30 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 205 g

Fujifilm FinePix F60fd

Fujifilm FinePix F60fd
5 months older

Significant advantages of the F60fd (vs the F200EXR)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the F60fd (vs the F200EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the F60fd and F200EXR

  • Very small: Compact (93×59×23 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 205 g vs 205 g

Fujifilm FinePix F40fd

Fujifilm FinePix F40fd
2 years older

Significant advantages of the F40fd (vs the F200EXR)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the F40fd (vs the F200EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the F40fd and F200EXR

  • Very small: Compact (96×59×23 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 181 g vs 205 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (compact (98×59×23 mm) vs compact (104×59×33 mm)) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), is older (february 2009 vs february 2010) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the F305EXR (vs the F200EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the F305EXR (vs the F200EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact (104×59×33 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the F305EXR and F200EXR

  • Very small: Compact (104×59×33 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 215 g vs 205 g

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR
1 year newer
$216

Significant advantages of the F80EXR (vs the F200EXR)

  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the F80EXR (vs the F200EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact (99×59×28 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)

common strengths of the F80EXR and F200EXR

  • Very small: Compact (99×59×28 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 210 g vs 205 g

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR
5 months newer
$414

Significant advantages of the F70EXR (vs the F200EXR)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the F70EXR (vs the F200EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the F70EXR and F200EXR

  • Very small: Compact (99×59×23 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 205 g vs 205 g

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, compared to pro digicam competitors the Fujifilm F200EXR has a much narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/1.4), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
3 years newer
$392

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the F200EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the F200EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-LX7 and F200EXR

  • None found

Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1
1 year newer
$549

Significant advantages of the XZ-1 (vs the F200EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XZ-1 (vs the F200EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the XZ-1 and F200EXR

  • None found