Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, pro digicams, ultra compacts and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F665 EXR and the FinePix F100fd) and Canon (such as the Powershot S100 and the PowerShot S95)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.8"), takes much higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 10 MP), has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm) and slightly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.4), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon Powershot S100 2 years newer $372 - $430	Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the F200EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3 Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm common strengths of the S100 and F200EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 12 MP vs 12 MP Very large sensors: 1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F100fd 1 year older	Significant advantages of the F100fd (vs the F200EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the F100fd (vs the F200EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0" common strengths of the F100fd and F200EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 12 MP vs 12 MP Very large sensors: 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the F100fd vs the F200EXR
Canon PowerShot S95 1 year newer $364 - $389	Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the F200EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3 Supports 24p Shoots RAW Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the F200EXR) Much lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 12 MP Smaller sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Thicker: 1.2" vs 0.9" common strengths of the S95 and F200EXR Very large sensors: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the Canon PowerShot S95 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Canon ELPH 300 HS 2 years newer $149 - $179	Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the F200EXR) Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 24fps vs 480p @ 30fps Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.3 Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 12 MP Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0" common strengths of the 300 HS and F200EXR None found
	Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5 1 year newer $230	Significant advantages of the DSC-WX5 (vs the F200EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.3 Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX5 (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Much lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 12 MP No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO common strengths of the DSC-WX5 and F200EXR None found
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX5 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 6 months older $575	Significant advantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the F200EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3 Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Supports 24p Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX3 (vs the F200EXR) Much lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 12 MP Larger: Compact 109x60x27 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm Worse boost ISO: 6,400 ISO vs 12,800 ISO common strengths of the DMC-LX3 and F200EXR Very large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact 98x59x23 mm vs compact 104x63x33 mm), takes much higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 10.6 MP), has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't have a built-in GPS, records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots).

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR 2 years newer	Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the F200EXR) Significantly more zoom: 15x vs 5x Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Much lower true resolution: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP Significantly larger: Compact 103x59x32 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm common strengths of the F665 EXR and F200EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the F665 EXR vs the F200EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR 2 years newer $344	Significant advantages of the F770 EXR (vs the F200EXR) Much more zoom: 20x vs 5x Has a GPS Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps Significant disadvantages of the F770 EXR (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Much larger: Compact 105x63x36 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm Much lower true resolution: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP common strengths of the F770 EXR and F200EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the FinePix F770 EXR vs the FinePix F200EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR 1 year newer	Significant advantages of the F305EXR (vs the F200EXR) Significantly more zoom: 15x vs 5x Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Supports 24p Significant disadvantages of the F305EXR (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Much lower true resolution: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP Significantly larger: Compact 103x59x32 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm common strengths of the F305EXR and F200EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the F305EXR vs the F200EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR 1 year newer $198	Significant advantages of the F80EXR (vs the F200EXR) Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second Significant disadvantages of the F80EXR (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Much lower true resolution: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP common strengths of the F80EXR and F200EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the F80EXR vs the F200EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR 1 year newer $225 - $281	Significant advantages of the F500 EXR (vs the F200EXR) Significantly more zoom: 15x vs 5x Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the F500 EXR (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Significantly larger: Compact 104x63x33 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm Much lower true resolution: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP common strengths of the F500 EXR and F200EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the F500 EXR vs the F200EXR
Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR 2 years newer $209 - $300	Significant advantages of the F600 EXR (vs the F200EXR) Has a GPS Significantly more zoom: 15x vs 5x Higher resolution movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps Significant disadvantages of the F600 EXR (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Significantly larger: Compact 104x63x33 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm Much lower true resolution: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP common strengths of the F600 EXR and F200EXR Capture extremely high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 12 MP Large sensors: 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Extremely good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the Finepix F600 EXR vs the FinePix F200EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact 98x59x23 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), takes much higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 10 MP), slightly higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none), is thinner (0.9" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (205 g vs 350 g).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/1.8), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps) and has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm).

Fujifilm Finepix X10 2 years newer $599	Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the F200EXR) Shoots RAW Much larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3 Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the F200EXR) Larger: Standard size 117x70x57 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm Smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.0" Significantly thicker: 2.2" vs 0.9" common strengths of the X10 and F200EXR Large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Capture extremely high resolution images: 12 MP vs 12 MP Very good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix F200EXR
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 1 year newer $350	Significant advantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the F200EXR) Shoots RAW Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.3 Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX5 (vs the F200EXR) Much lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 12 MP common strengths of the DMC-LX5 and F200EXR Large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Fairly small: Mid size 109x65x42 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm Very good boost ISO: 12,800 ISO vs 12,800 ISO
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Olympus XZ-1 1 year newer $499 - $500	Significant advantages of the XZ-1 (vs the F200EXR) Shoots RAW Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.3 Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Significant disadvantages of the XZ-1 (vs the F200EXR) Much lower true resolution: 10 MP vs 12 MP No boost ISO: None vs 12,800 ISO common strengths of the XZ-1 and F200EXR Large sensors: 1/1.7" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Fairly small: Mid size 110x64x42 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm
	Compare the Olympus XZ-1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.0" vs 2.7"), takes much higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 8.1 MP), has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm) and has boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.4), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), is slightly larger (compact 98x59x23 mm vs ultra compact 91x52x20 mm) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 6 months newer $285	Significant advantages of the DSC-WX1 (vs the F200EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.3 Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX1 (vs the F200EXR) Much smaller sensor: 1/2.7" 5.6x4.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Much lower true resolution: 8.1 MP vs 12 MP Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.0" common strengths of the DSC-WX1 and F200EXR None found
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F200EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (compact 98x59x23 mm vs prosumer size 116x83x91 mm), takes much higher resolution photos (12 MP vs 9 MP), has a much larger sensor (1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm), significantly closer macro focusing (5 cm vs 12 cm) and much higher boost light sensitivity (12,800 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2.8), has much less zoom (5x vs 26x), records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps).

Samsung HZ50W 1 year newer	Significant advantages of the HZ50W (vs the F200EXR) Much more zoom: 26x vs 5x Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3 Shoots RAW Significant disadvantages of the HZ50W (vs the F200EXR) Much larger: Prosumer size 116x83x91 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.1x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm Much lower true resolution: 9.8 MP vs 12 MP common strengths of the HZ50W and F200EXR Light weight: 426 g vs 205 g
	Compare the Samsung HZ50W vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Casio Exilim EX-FH20 4 months older	Significant advantages of the EX-FH20 (vs the F200EXR) Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.3 Significant disadvantages of the EX-FH20 (vs the F200EXR) Much lower true resolution: 9 MP vs 12 MP Much larger: Prosumer size 123x81x85 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm vs 1/1.7" 7.8x5.8mm common strengths of the EX-FH20 and F200EXR Fairly small: Prosumer size 123x81x85 mm vs Compact 98x59x23 mm Thin: 3.3" vs 0.9"
	Compare the Casio Exilim EX-FH20 vs the Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR