As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix F100fd is also often compared to travel zooms and mirrorless. The Fujifilm FinePix F100fd's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F80EXR and the FinePix F200EXR) and Casio (such as the Exilim EX-H30)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F100fd compared to other compact competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact (98×59×23 mm) vs compact (98×58×31 mm)) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.2").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.3 vs f/2), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (12 MP vs 20 MP).

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the F200EXR (vs the F100fd)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the F200EXR (vs the F100fd)

  • None found

common strengths of the F200EXR and F100fd

  • Very small: Compact (98×59×23 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 205 g vs 210 g

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
9 years newer
$369 - $429

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the F100fd)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.3
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the F100fd)

  • Much larger: Compact (98×58×31 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.2" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and F100fd

  • Very small: Compact (98×58×31 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 206 g vs 210 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX100
8 months older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX100 (vs the F100fd)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly lighter: 150 g vs 210 g
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX100 (vs the F100fd)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the DMC-FX100 and F100fd

  • Very small: Compact (97×54×24 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 210 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F100fd compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact (98×59×23 mm) vs compact (97×57×29 mm)), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), is older (january 2008 vs february 2014), is slightly heavier (210 g vs 168 g) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second).

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR
2 years newer
$216

Significant advantages of the F80EXR (vs the F100fd)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the F80EXR (vs the F100fd)

  • Much larger: Compact (99×59×28 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)

common strengths of the F80EXR and F100fd

  • Very small: Compact (99×59×28 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 210 g vs 210 g

Casio Exilim EX-H30

Casio Exilim EX-H30
2 years newer
$320

Significant advantages of the EX-H30 (vs the F100fd)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the EX-H30 (vs the F100fd)

  • Much larger: Compact (104×58×28 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)

common strengths of the EX-H30 and F100fd

  • Very small: Compact (104×58×28 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145
6 years newer
$259

Significant advantages of the IXUS 145 (vs the F100fd)

  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Much lighter: 127 g vs 210 g
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 145 (vs the F100fd)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the IXUS 145 and F100fd

  • Very small: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 127 g vs 210 g

Fujifilm FinePix JZ500

Fujifilm FinePix JZ500
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the JZ500 (vs the F100fd)

  • Lighter: 168 g vs 210 g

Significant disadvantages of the JZ500 (vs the F100fd)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much larger: Compact (97×57×29 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Thicker: 1.1" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the JZ500 and F100fd

  • Very small: Compact (97×57×29 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 168 g vs 210 g

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm F100fd compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (12 MP vs 20.5 MP) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Samsung NX Mini

Samsung NX Mini
6 years newer
$219 (body only)

Significant advantages of the Mini (vs the F100fd)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Has a touch screen
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Mini (vs the F100fd)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Mini and F100fd

  • Fairly small: Compact (110×62×23 mm) vs Compact (98×59×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 154 g vs 210 g