As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix A400 Zoom is also often compared to digicams and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix A400 Zoom's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix A900 and the MX-1200) and Canon (such as the PowerShot ELPH 150 IS)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm A400 Zoom compared to other compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (1.8" vs 2.5"), takes slightly lower resolution photos (4 MP vs 9.1 MP) and is older (january 2006 vs august 2008).

Fujifilm FinePix A900

Fujifilm FinePix A900
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the A900 (vs the A400 Zoom)

  • Significantly larger screen: 2.5" vs 1.8"
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 9.1 MP vs 4 MP

Significant disadvantages of the A900 (vs the A400 Zoom)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the A900 and A400 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash

Olympus FE-20

Olympus FE-20
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the FE-20 (vs the A400 Zoom)

  • Better wide angle: 36 mm vs 38 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.5" vs 1.8"
  • Higher true resolution: 8 MP vs 4 MP

Significant disadvantages of the FE-20 (vs the A400 Zoom)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the FE-20 and A400 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 128 g vs 170 g

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm A400 Zoom compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider aperture (f/3.3 vs f/4.5), takes slightly higher resolution photos (4 MP vs 1.2 MP), is newer (january 2006 vs september 1999) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/1500 of a second vs 1/750 of a second).

Fujifilm MX-1200

Placeholder
6 years older
$111

Significant advantages of the MX-1200 (vs the A400 Zoom)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the MX-1200 (vs the A400 Zoom)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/4.5 vs f/3.3
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/750 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second

common strengths of the MX-1200 and A400 Zoom

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm A400 Zoom compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (38 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (1.8" vs 2.7"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens), takes significantly lower resolution photos (4 MP vs 9.7 MP) and is older (january 2006 vs february 2014).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS
8 years newer
$315

Significant advantages of the ELPH 150 IS (vs the A400 Zoom)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 38 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.8"

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 150 IS (vs the A400 Zoom)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the ELPH 150 IS and A400 Zoom

  • Very small: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Compact (93×60×28 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"
  • Very light: 142 g vs 170 g