As well as being compared against other digicams, the Fujifilm FinePix A101 is also often compared to ultra compacts and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix A101's top rivals come from Polaroid (such as the Z2300 Instant Digital Camera) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S3100)

Competitor classes

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm A101 compared to other digicam competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (1.6" vs 3") and is older (august 2001 vs june 2012).

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera
11 years newer
$88

Significant advantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the A101)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 1.6"

Significant disadvantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the A101)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the Instant Digital Camera and A101

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm A101 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 26 mm), has a much smaller screen (1.6" vs 2.7"), is much larger (mid size (99×65×41 mm) vs ultra compact (94×58×18 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs sensor shift) and takes much lower resolution photos (1.2 MP vs 9.7 MP).

Nikon Coolpix S3100

Nikon Coolpix S3100
9 years newer
$100

Significant advantages of the S3100 (vs the A101)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S3100 (vs the A101)

  • None found

common strengths of the S3100 and A101

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm A101 compared to compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (1.6" vs 2.7"), is much larger (mid size (99×65×41 mm) vs compact (97×58×23 mm)), takes significantly lower resolution photos (1.2 MP vs 8 MP), is older (august 2001 vs january 2008) and is thicker (1.6" vs 0.9").

Olympus FE-340

Olympus FE-340
6 years newer

Significant advantages of the FE-340 (vs the A101)

  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 1.6"
  • Much smaller: Compact (97×58×23 mm) vs Mid size (99×65×41 mm)
  • Much thinner: 0.9" vs 1.6"

Significant disadvantages of the FE-340 (vs the A101)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the FE-340 and A101

  • Each has a built-in flash