The Fujifilm FinePix 700 is mostly gets compared to super zooms, travel zooms and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix 700's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix L830 and the Coolpix S2700) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix T550)

Competitor classes

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm FinePix 700 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (mid size (80×101×33 mm) vs prosumer size (111×76×91 mm)), is thinner (1.3" vs 3.6"), is slightly lighter (260 g vs 508 g) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.2 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 22 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (1.3 MP vs 9.7 MP).

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
16 years newer
$244

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the FinePix 700)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 35 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the FinePix 700)

  • Significantly thicker: 3.6" vs 1.3"
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the L830 and FinePix 700

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Mid size (80×101×33 mm)
  • Light weight: 508 g vs 260 g
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 1.3"

Olympus C-700 UZ

Placeholder
3 years newer

Significant advantages of the C-700 UZ (vs the FinePix 700)

  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the C-700 UZ (vs the FinePix 700)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2"
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 35 mm
  • Thicker: 3.1" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the C-700 UZ and FinePix 700

  • Fairly small: Standard size (108×76×78 mm) vs Mid size (80×101×33 mm)
  • Very light: 340 g vs 260 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.3"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm FinePix 700 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), is much larger (mid size (80×101×33 mm) vs super compact (99×57×19 mm)), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and takes significantly lower resolution photos (1.3 MP vs 9.7 MP).

Fujifilm FinePix T550

Fujifilm FinePix T550
15 years newer

Significant advantages of the T550 (vs the FinePix 700)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (99×57×19 mm) vs Mid size (80×101×33 mm)
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 35 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"

Significant disadvantages of the T550 (vs the FinePix 700)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the T550 and FinePix 700

  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×57×19 mm) vs Mid size (80×101×33 mm)
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 1.3"
  • Light weight: 141 g vs 260 g

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm FinePix 700 compared to compact competitors include: it has a viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (35 mm vs 26 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 2.7"), is much larger (mid size (80×101×33 mm) vs super compact (95×58×21 mm)), takes significantly lower resolution photos (1.3 MP vs 9.7 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 1,600 ISO).

Nikon Coolpix S2700

Nikon Coolpix S2700
15 years newer
$241

Significant advantages of the S2700 (vs the FinePix 700)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (95×58×21 mm) vs Mid size (80×101×33 mm)
  • Much larger screen: 2.7" vs 2"
  • Much better wide angle: 26 mm vs 35 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S2700 (vs the FinePix 700)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel

common strengths of the S2700 and FinePix 700

  • Inexpensive: $241.47 vs $320.59