The Fujifilm FinePix 4700 Zoom is mostly gets compared to super zooms, pro digicams and compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix 4700 Zoom's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix P510 and the Coolpix L320) and Casio (such as the QV-R61)

Competitor classes

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm 4700 Zoom compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.1), is slightly smaller (mid size (78×98×33 mm) vs professional size (120×83×102 mm)), is thinner (1.3" vs 4"), is slightly lighter (280 g vs 555 g) and has higher quality type of viewfinder (tunnel vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 22 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 3"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (130k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have image stabilization (none vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (4.3 MP vs 9.7 MP).

Nikon Coolpix P510

Nikon Coolpix P510
12 years newer
$299

Significant advantages of the P510 (vs the 4700 Zoom)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 36 mm
  • Image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs None

Significant disadvantages of the P510 (vs the 4700 Zoom)

  • Significantly thicker: 4" vs 1.3"

common strengths of the P510 and 4700 Zoom

  • Fairly small: Professional size (120×83×102 mm) vs Mid size (78×98×33 mm)
  • Light weight: 555 g vs 280 g
  • Thin: 4" vs 1.3"

Nikon Coolpix L320

Nikon Coolpix L320
13 years newer
$353

Significant advantages of the L320 (vs the 4700 Zoom)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2"
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 36 mm
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 4.3 MP

Significant disadvantages of the L320 (vs the 4700 Zoom)

  • Thicker: 3.3" vs 1.3"
  • No viewfinder: None vs Tunnel
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the L320 and 4700 Zoom

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm) vs Mid size (78×98×33 mm)
  • Light weight: 430 g vs 280 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 1.3"

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm 4700 Zoom compared to pro digicam competitors include: it is slightly smaller (mid size (78×98×33 mm) vs prosumer size (127×83×67 mm)), is thinner (1.3" vs 2.6"), is slightly lighter (280 g vs 455 g) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (36 mm vs 33 mm), has a much smaller screen (2" vs 2.5"), is older (january 2000 vs february 2002) and doesn't support an external flash.

Leica Digilux 1

Placeholder
2 years newer

Significant advantages of the Digilux 1 (vs the 4700 Zoom)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Digilux 1 (vs the 4700 Zoom)

  • None found

common strengths of the Digilux 1 and 4700 Zoom

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm 4700 Zoom compared to compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (36 mm vs 39 mm).

However, on average it is much larger (mid size (78×98×33 mm) vs compact (88×61×33 mm)), is older (january 2000 vs august 2004) and is significantly heavier (280 g vs 218 g).

Casio QV-R61

Placeholder
4 years newer

Significant advantages of the QV-R61 (vs the 4700 Zoom)

  • Much smaller: Compact (88×61×33 mm) vs Mid size (78×98×33 mm)
  • Significantly lighter: 218 g vs 280 g

Significant disadvantages of the QV-R61 (vs the 4700 Zoom)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 39 mm vs 36 mm

common strengths of the QV-R61 and 4700 Zoom

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Both have tunnel viewfinders: Tunnel vs Tunnel