As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR is also often compared to mirrorless, ultra compacts and super zooms. The Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Alpha A6000 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX1) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z1000 EXR and the FinePix Z808EXR)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z900EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), is slightly smaller (super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs super compact (98×59×20 mm)), shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 6 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and has a slightly longer battery life (220 shots vs 150 shots).

However, on average it doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and is older (april 2011 vs august 2011).

Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR
9 months newer

Significant advantages of the Z1000 EXR (vs the Z900EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z1000 EXR (vs the Z900EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z1000 EXR and Z900EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs Super compact (101×59×18 mm)
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix S100

Nikon Coolpix S100
4 months newer
$260

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the Z900EXR)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the Z900EXR)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 150 shots vs 220 shots
  • Shoots slower: 6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S100 and Z900EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (99×65×18 mm) vs Super compact (101×59×18 mm)
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
8 months older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z900EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z900EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots significantly slower: 1.6 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z900EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (101×59×18 mm)
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z900EXR compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), records high-speed movies (320 fps vs none), has a touch screen, is slightly smaller (super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs mid size (120×67×45 mm)) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.8").

However, on average it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and takes significantly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 24 MP).

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
2 years newer
$379 - $498 (body only)
$479 - $598 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the Z900EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Supports 24p
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the Z900EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Doesn't record high-speed movies: None vs 320 fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A6000 and Z900EXR

  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×45 mm) vs Super compact (101×59×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 285 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 1.8" vs 0.7"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z900EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), is newer (april 2011 vs august 2009) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1250 of a second).

However, on average it is slightly larger (super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs ultra compact (94×58×17 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
1 year older
$299

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Z900EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX1 (vs the Z900EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX1 and Z900EXR

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z900EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs professional size (125×87×110 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 4.3") and is significantly lighter (158 g vs 588 g).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't have a screen which flips out and lacks and external mic jack.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
1 year newer
$534

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the Z900EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much longer battery life: 540 shots vs 220 shots
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ200 (vs the Z900EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (125×87×110 mm) vs Super compact (101×59×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-FZ200 and Z900EXR

  • Fairly small: Professional size (125×87×110 mm) vs Super compact (101×59×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 588 g vs 158 g
  • Thin: 4.3" vs 0.7"