As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm Z115 is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts and digicams. The Fujifilm Z115's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S6200 and the Coolpix S6100) and Casio (such as the Exilim EX-Z80)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z115 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a touch screen, is thinner (0.8" vs 1") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2) and has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 250 shots).

Nikon Coolpix S6100

Nikon Coolpix S6100
1 year older

Significant advantages of the S6100 (vs the Z115)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S6100 (vs the Z115)

  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the S6100 and Z115

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (98×58×27 mm) vs Super compact (97×58×20 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Panasonic Lumix F5

Panasonic Lumix F5
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the F5 (vs the Z115)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the F5 (vs the Z115)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the F5 and Z115

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×58×22 mm) vs Super compact (97×58×20 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.8"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z115 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact (97×58×20 mm) vs compact (93×58×26 mm)), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2012 vs august 2011) and is thinner (0.8" vs 1").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2) and has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 250 shots).

Nikon Coolpix S6200

Nikon Coolpix S6200
4 months older

Significant advantages of the S6200 (vs the Z115)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S6200 (vs the Z115)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.8"

common strengths of the S6200 and Z115

  • Very small: Compact (93×58×26 mm) vs Super compact (97×58×20 mm)
  • Very thin: 1" vs 0.8"
  • Very light: 160 g vs 145 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z115 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a touch screen and is newer (january 2012 vs january 2008).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1) and is slightly heavier (145 g vs 100 g).

Casio Exilim EX-Z80

Casio Exilim EX-Z80
4 years older
$644

Significant advantages of the EX-Z80 (vs the Z115)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z80 (vs the Z115)

  • None found

common strengths of the EX-Z80 and Z115

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z115 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 39 mm), has a much larger screen (2.7" vs 1.5"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (230k dots vs 55k dots), takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 1.9 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Fujifilm FinePix A200

Placeholder
9 years older

Significant advantages of the A200 (vs the Z115)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the A200 (vs the Z115)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/4.6 vs f/3.9

common strengths of the A200 and Z115

  • Light weight: 180 g vs 145 g

HP Photosmart C20

Placeholder
14 years older

Significant advantages of the C20 (vs the Z115)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the C20 (vs the Z115)

  • Much worse wide angle: 39 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.7"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the C20 and Z115

  • None found