As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms and pro digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z1000 EXR and the FinePix ) and Canon (such as the ELPH 320 HS and the PowerShot ELPH 530 HS)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks built-in panoramas and slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm).

Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z1000 EXR
similar age
$265

Significant advantages of the Z1000 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z1000 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z1000 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 102x60x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm FinePix

Fujifilm FinePix Z110
similar age

Significant advantages of the FinePix (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the FinePix and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x58x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$160

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
10 months older
$269

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 0.8 fps vs 12 fps
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix XP20

Fujifilm FinePix XP20
similar age
$178

Significant advantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 0.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the XP20 and Z1000EXR

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Olympus VG-160

Olympus VG-160
similar age
$92

Significant advantages of the VG-160 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the VG-160 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the VG-160 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't record movies in 24p and lacks built-in panoramas.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
similar age
$136 - $218

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
2 years older
$179

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 1.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$100

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Canon ELPH 530 HS
similar age
$175

Significant advantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots much slower: 2.6 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 530 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
similar age
$150

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
  • Very fast max shutter speeds: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.2 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't record movies in 24p and lacks built-in panoramas.

Nikon Coolpix S6800

Nikon Coolpix S6800
2 years newer
$90 - $217

Significant advantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S6800 and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 9.4 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$350

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix T400

Fujifilm FinePix T400
similar age
$59

Significant advantages of the T400 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the T400 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 1.1 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the T400 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
7 months newer
$128

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly longer battery life: 380 shots vs 220 shots
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$369

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Supports 24p
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 3.2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$119 - $220

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 8 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2").

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps).

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Nikon Coolpix P7800
1 year newer
$499 - $547

Significant advantages of the P7800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P7800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly heavier: 399 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the P7800 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$351

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found