As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, pro digicams and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX510 HS and the ELPH 500 HS) and Fujifilm (such as the Finepix JX500 and the FinePix F900EXR)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.7 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 6 cm) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Casio Exilim EX-Z1000

Casio Exilim EX-Z1000
5 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-Z1000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z1000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the EX-Z1000 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x58x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Casio Exilim EX-Z1000 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
1 year older
$199

Significant advantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots slower: 3.4 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 500 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 500 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix JX500

Fujifilm Finepix JX500
similar age

Significant advantages of the JX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the JX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the JX500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Finepix JX500 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90
4 months older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots slower: 3.7 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the DMC-FX90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 102x56x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$147

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.6 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Canon ELPH 530 HS
similar age
$160

Significant advantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 2.6 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 530 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$93 - $138

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Digital vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$225

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$198 - $214

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$119

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 25fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 0.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR
1 year newer
$206 - $336

Significant advantages of the F900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the F900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the F900EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$450

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
4 months older
$199

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F665 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the F665 EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
7 months newer
$250

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly longer battery life: 380 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR
2 years older

Significant advantages of the F70EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the F70EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F70EXR and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the F70EXR vs the Z1000EXR

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 118x77x50 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is significantly lighter (157 g vs 392 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps).

Nikon Coolpix P7700

Nikon Coolpix P7700
7 months newer
$449

Significant advantages of the P7700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the P7700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly heavier: 392 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the P7700 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P7700 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$323 - $591

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Nikon Coolpix P7800
1 year newer
$547 - $699

Significant advantages of the P7800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P7800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly heavier: 399 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the P7800 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P7800 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 104x70x80 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.8 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.1").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.4), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
1 year newer
$199 - $200

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 0 cm vs 9 cm
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the SX510 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 349 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR