As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to boutiques, ultra compacts, super zooms, travel zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S2500HD and the FinePix F800EXR) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix FH10 and the Lumix ZS30)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.4 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't record movies in 24p and lacks a built-in HDR feature.

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Shoots much slower: 1.6 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$70

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$280

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1
1 year newer
$369

Significant advantages of the DMC-LF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×62×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the DMC-LF1 and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
1 year older
$145

Significant advantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 3.4 fps vs 12 fps
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the 500 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (101×55×25 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
similar age
$250

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to boutique competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (5x vs 4x), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×81×65 mm)), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.9 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 14.2 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X
similar age
$402

Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 1.9 fps vs 12 fps
  • Much worse macro capability: 20.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

common strengths of the G1X and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks a built-in HDR feature.

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$108

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
similar age
$148

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$228

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$200

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$118

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
similar age
$146

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 2.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs large (131×91×126 mm)), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.3 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 480 fps), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$192

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 1.3 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR
1 year newer
$1,517

Significant advantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (131×97×126 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS35EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
2 years newer
$250

Significant advantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly more zoom: 50x vs 5x
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Professional size (123×87×116 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9400W and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10
1 year older
$400

Significant advantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (131×91×126 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS10 and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd
4 years older

Significant advantages of the S1000fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S1000fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S1000fd and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Standard size (103×73×68 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR
1 year newer
$311

Significant advantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (135×101×146 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS50EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 0.8 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and slightly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs 1,600 ISO).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and lacks a built-in HDR feature.

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$259

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F
2 years newer
$150 - $210

Significant advantages of the WB350F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the WB350F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the WB350F and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$148

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
7 months newer
$229

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Much longer battery life: 380 shots vs 220 shots
  • Faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 0.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS
1 year newer
$237

Significant advantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 130 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots much slower: 0.8 fps vs 12 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the ELPH 130 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix JZ700

Fujifilm FinePix JZ700
1 year newer
$88

Significant advantages of the JZ700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the JZ700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the JZ700 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (128×72×57 mm)), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes significantly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 1.9 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.4), lacks built-in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 300 shots) and slightly worse macro focusing (9.0 cm vs 5.0 cm).

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR
6 months newer
$196

Significant advantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F800EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 208 g vs 157 g

Pentax EI-200

Placeholder
12 years older

Significant advantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 34 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the EI-200 and Z1000EXR

  • None found