As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to mirrorless, pro digicams, travel zooms, ultra compacts and boutiques. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the Finepix X10 and the FinePix Z808EXR) and Samsung (such as the NX Mini and the MV900F MultiView)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.2"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and has a slightly longer battery life (220 shots vs 170 shots).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Shoots much slower: 1.6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm FinePix Z200FD

Fujifilm FinePix Z200FD
3 years older

Significant advantages of the Z200FD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the Z200FD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 28 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Z200FD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$219

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Samsung MV900F MultiView

Samsung MV900F MultiView
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×60×17 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix S100

Nikon Coolpix S100
4 months older
$199

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Shorter battery life: 150 shots vs 220 shots
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S100 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×65×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$193

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 6 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.4").

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 768k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 20.5 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.6mm).

Samsung NX Mini

Samsung NX Mini
2 years newer
$292 (body only)
$290 9mm lens

Significant advantages of the Mini (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Mini (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Mini and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (110×62×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000
2 years newer
$287 (body only)
$448 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A5000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the A5000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A5000 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (110×63×36 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 210 g vs 157 g

Samsung NX3000

Samsung NX3000
2 years newer
$376 (body only)
$365 - $449 20-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX3000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the NX3000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the NX3000 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×66×39 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 230 g vs 157 g

Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300
1 year newer
$499 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the NX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly thicker: 1.6" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the NX300 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (122×64×41 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Samsung NX1000

Samsung NX1000
3 months newer
$370 (body only)
$299 20-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX1000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the NX1000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the NX1000 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Mid size (114×63×37 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 222 g vs 157 g

Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX2000
1 year newer
$310 20-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX2000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger screen: 3.7" vs 3.5"
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the NX2000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the NX2000 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.7" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (119×65×36 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (119×72×60 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.4") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 423 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$449

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 200 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$579

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm X30

Fujifilm X30
2 years newer
$435 - $499

Significant advantages of the X30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the X30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.4" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X30 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (133×71×19 mm)), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 8.7 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,036k dots).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
1 year newer
$235

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Much longer battery life: 500 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Compact (96×55×25 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS
1 year newer
$511

Significant advantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 6.2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the IXUS 255 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (97×56×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
4 months older
$329

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45
3 years newer
$159

Significant advantages of the DMC-ZS45 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-ZS45 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much larger: Compact (108×60×32 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the DMC-ZS45 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
2 years newer
$474

Significant advantages of the Camera 2 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger screen: 4.8" vs 3.5"
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Camera 2 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (133×71×19 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much heavier: 283 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the Camera 2 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 4.8" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 5 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (96×59×15 mm)) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$228 - $242

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$200

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition
1 year newer
$402

Significant advantages of the Silver Edition (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Silver Edition (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Silver Edition and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to boutique competitors include: it has way more more zoom (5x vs 1x), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (127×75×54 mm)) and has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 51,200 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X
similar age
$589

Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse macro capability: 20.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Shoots much slower: 1.9 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the G1X and Z1000EXR

  • Incredible zoom: 4x vs 5x
  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm FinePix X100

Fujifilm FinePix X100
1 year older
$649

Significant advantages of the X100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the X100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much less zoom: 1x vs 5x
  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse macro capability: 10.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

common strengths of the X100 and Z1000EXR

  • Thin: 2.1" vs 0.7"
  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70
4 years newer
$650 - $699

Significant advantages of the X70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 460k dots
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the X70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots significantly slower: 8 fps vs 12 fps
  • Significantly thicker: 1.7" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X70 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×44 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 1.7" vs 0.7"