Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, pro digicams, travel zooms, super zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z33WP and the Finepix Z900EXR) and Sony (such as the Cybershot DSC-TX66 and the Cyber-shot DSC-WX80)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 96x64x23 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP 2 years older	Significant advantages of the Z33WP (vs the Z1000EXR) Waterproof Lighter: 110 g vs 157 g Significant disadvantages of the Z33WP (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the Z33WP and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 92x60x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Z33WP vs the Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix P300 1 year older $278	Significant advantages of the P300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9 Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the P300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm No touch screen common strengths of the P300 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR 9 months older $193	Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None Can create panoramas in-camera Has in-camera HDR Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR
Samsung MV900F MultiView 6 months newer $225 - $250	Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9 Has a flip-out screen Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x17 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Samsung MV900F MultiView vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix XP10 1 year older	Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Waterproof Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift common strengths of the XP10 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the XP10 vs the Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix AW110 1 year newer $233	Significant advantages of the AW110 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the AW110 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Compact 110x65x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the AW110 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW110 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.8 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), lacks a built in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos and has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 290 shots).

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 similar age $199	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z20fd 4 years older	Significant advantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the Z20fd and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Z20fd vs the Z1000EXR
Samsung ST72 1 year newer $147	Significant advantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9 Can create panoramas in-camera Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the ST72 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5" Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Samsung ST72 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 1 year newer $120 - $158	Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 2 years older	Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Samsung DV150F 1 year newer $91 - $99	Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9 Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), has a touch screen, is newer (january, 2012 vs september, 2011) and is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2").

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm Finepix X10 4 months older $331 - $425	Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Shoots RAW Much larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5" No touch screen Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7" common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 105x59x28 mm), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.2 fps).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), doesn't have a built-in GPS and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 1 year newer $148 - $191	Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR) Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 92x52x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix S6500 1 year newer $94 - $167	Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9 Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7" common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 95x58x26 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Light weight: 153 g vs 157 g
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 similar age $93	Significant advantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9 Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the JZ200 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7" Light weight: 135 g vs 157 g
	Compare the JZ200 vs the Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix ZS30 1 year newer $319 - $399	Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a GPS Much more zoom: 20x vs 5x Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7" common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR Have touch screens Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS similar age $200 - $300	Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a GPS Much more zoom: 20x vs 5x Supports 24p Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Compact 106x61x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix S6600 1 year newer $194	Significant advantages of the S6600 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a flip-out screen Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the S6600 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7" common strengths of the S6600 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 96x57x27 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6600 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 111x76x85 mm), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 8 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.0), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 29.3x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L820 1 year newer $180 - $279	Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots More zoom: 29.3x vs 5x Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the L820 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Light weight: 470 g vs 157 g
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 37 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.5"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 61k dots), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 144x88x72 mm) and has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and doesn't support an external flash.

Kodak EasyShare CX7220 8 years older	Significant advantages of the CX7220 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the CX7220 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much worse macro capability: 60 cm vs 9 cm Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 3.5" No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift common strengths of the CX7220 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Kodak EasyShare CX7220 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Ricoh RDC-4300 13 years older	Significant advantages of the RDC-4300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the RDC-4300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5" Much lower true resolution: 1.2 MP vs 10.6 MP No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift common strengths of the RDC-4300 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Ricoh RDC-4300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Ricoh RDC-200G 11 years older	Significant advantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly better macro capability: 4 cm vs 9 cm Supports an external flash Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5" Much lower true resolution: 2.2 MP vs 10.6 MP Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm common strengths of the RDC-200G and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Ricoh RDC-200G vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR