As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, super zooms, boutiques and ultra compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the IXY 30S and the PowerShot ELPH 340 HS) and Fujifilm (such as the Finepix Z900EXR and the FinePix S1000fd)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.2"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.7 fps) and is newer (january 2012 vs april 2011).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Canon IXY 30S

Canon IXY 30S
1 year older

Significant advantages of the IXY 30S (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the IXY 30S (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the IXY 30S and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (100×54×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$240

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Shoots much slower: 1.6 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$223

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Nikon Coolpix S100

Nikon Coolpix S100
4 months older
$157

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Shorter battery life: 150 shots vs 220 shots

common strengths of the S100 and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×65×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1
1 year newer
$419

Significant advantages of the DMC-LF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×62×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the DMC-LF1 and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.3 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and lacks a built-in HDR feature.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
2 years newer
$165

Significant advantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 340 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10.5 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F
2 years newer
$200 - $209

Significant advantages of the WB350F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the WB350F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the WB350F and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon Powershot N Facebook ready

Canon Powershot N Facebook ready
1 year newer
$305

Significant advantages of the N Facebook ready (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the N Facebook ready (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2.3 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the N Facebook ready and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
1 year newer
$225

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much longer battery life: 500 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus Stylus SZ-15

Olympus Stylus SZ-15
1 year newer
$132

Significant advantages of the SZ-15 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-15 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the SZ-15 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$80

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs large (131×91×126 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2012 vs february 2010).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 480 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd
4 years older

Significant advantages of the S1000fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S1000fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S1000fd and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Standard size (103×73×68 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR
1 year newer
$396

Significant advantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much longer battery life: 600 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (131×97×126 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS35EXR and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10
1 year older
$400

Significant advantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (131×91×126 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS10 and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
2 years newer
$250

Significant advantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly more zoom: 50x vs 5x
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Professional size (123×87×116 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9400W and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Inexpensive: $249.95 vs $205.21

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR
1 year newer
$304

Significant advantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (135×101×146 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS50EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 12 fps
  • Inexpensive: $303.64 vs $205.21

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to boutique competitors include: it has significantly more zoom (5x vs 4x), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×81×65 mm)), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.9 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 14.2 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X
similar age
$549

Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 1.9 fps vs 12 fps
  • Much worse macro capability: 20.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

common strengths of the G1X and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Inexpensive: $549.00 vs $205.21

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (93×54×13 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$116

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$123

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$268

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$150

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$230

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
similar age
$190

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS