As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, super zooms and pro digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the Finepix Z900EXR and the FinePix Z808EXR) and Canon (such as the PowerShot S200 and the ELPH 320 HS)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't record movies in 24p and lacks a built-in HDR feature.

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$138

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200
2 years newer
$400

Significant advantages of the S200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 1.9 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the S200 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (100×59×26 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$164

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Shoots much slower: 1.6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$174

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Olympus TG-630 iHS

Olympus TG-630 iHS
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the TG-630 iHS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the TG-630 iHS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 5 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the TG-630 iHS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (98×66×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$117

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
similar age
$135

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$245

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$228

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30
5 months older
$163

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (104×59×29 mm)), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.2 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F
1 year newer
$230

Significant advantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly heavier: 226 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the WB250F and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Compact (107×62×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
2 years newer
$251

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (111×64×34 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
1 year newer
$230

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (92×52×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 124 g vs 157 g

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
1 year newer
$320

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • More zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the ZS25 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm FinePix T400

Fujifilm FinePix T400
similar age
$175

Significant advantages of the T400 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the T400 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the T400 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (104×59×29 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 159 g vs 157 g

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 29.3x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$206 - $229

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • More zoom: 37.2x vs 5x
  • Much longer battery life: 590 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Inexpensive: $199.99 vs $356.32

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$140

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
1 year newer
$236

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L820 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 157 g

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
2 years newer
$199

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Inexpensive: $199.00 vs $356.32

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
3 years newer
$1,150 - $1,198

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 II and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$683

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$400

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 200 fps vs None
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Inexpensive: $399.95 vs $356.32