As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms and ultra compacts. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the IXUS 255 HS and the PowerShot ELPH 520 HS) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z90 and the FinePix Z808EXR)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
10 months older
$110

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
similar age
$199

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$140

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120
2 years newer
$189 - $347

Significant advantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x66x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the AW120 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix XP10

Fujifilm FinePix XP10
1 year older
$120

Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the XP10 and Z1000EXR

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.8 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.0), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS
1 year newer
$564

Significant advantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the IXUS 255 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 97x56x23 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
2 years newer
$108 - $119

Significant advantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DSC-W830 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact 93x52x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 157 g

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
similar age
$150 - $189

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 2.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Ultra compact 87x54x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
2 years newer
$159

Significant advantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 340 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x58x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Canon Powershot N Facebook ready

Canon Powershot N Facebook ready
1 year newer
$305

Significant advantages of the N Facebook ready (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the N Facebook ready (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots significantly slower: 2.3 fps vs 12 fps
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the N Facebook ready and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 79x60x29 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR
2 years older
$223

Significant advantages of the F70EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the F70EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F70EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x59x23 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs ultra compact 93x54x13 mm) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$99

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
similar age
$149 - $218

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$131

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Lighter: 103 g vs 157 g

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$198 - $212

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3
1 year newer
$98

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS3 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$266

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift