As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to super zooms, travel zooms and waterproofs. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z808EXR and the FinePix S2500HD) and Pentax (such as the Optio LS465)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't have a screen which flips out and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$149

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Samsung MV900F MultiView

Samsung MV900F MultiView
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×60×17 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (110×73×81 mm)), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.3 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$200

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is much smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (106×61×33 mm)), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.2 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$345

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.3") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (96×59×15 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$1,913

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found