As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to pro digicams and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix x20 and the FinePix Z808EXR) and Pentax (such as the Optio LS465)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

Pentax Optio LS465

Placeholder
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and lacks and external mic jack.

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Placeholder
1 year newer
$659

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 25fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), has a touch screen and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A4000 IS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Compact (95×56×24 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"