As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to waterproofs, super zooms and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 and the Cyber-shot DSC-W710) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L840)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), doesn't have a screen which flips out, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), is older (january 2012 vs january 2013) and is slightly heavier (157 g vs 122 g).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710
1 year newer
$90

Significant advantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-W710 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×55×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 114 g vs 157 g

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$149

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 157 g

Samsung MV900F MultiView

Samsung MV900F MultiView
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×60×17 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.3") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (96×59×15 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$698

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Ultra compact (96×59×15 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 37.2x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$185

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much longer battery life: 590 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 538 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 25fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (106×61×33 mm)), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.2 fps).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$399

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS
similar age
$210

Significant advantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A4000 IS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Compact (95×56×24 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"