As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to waterproofs and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX30) and Samsung (such as the MV900F MultiView)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't have a screen which flips out and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Samsung MV900F MultiView

Samsung MV900F MultiView
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (99×60×17 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$175

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 157 g

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.3") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (96×59×15 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$1,295

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 25fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), has a touch screen and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 15 seconds).

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS
similar age
$178

Significant advantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A4000 IS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Compact (95×56×24 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 145 g vs 157 g