As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, pro digicams, ultra compacts, super zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX270 HS and the PowerShot S200) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L840 and the Coolpix AW120)
Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (100×59×26 mm)), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 5 fps).
However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3") and has a touch screen.
However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS, doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).
However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).
However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (93×54×13 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6").
However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 29.3x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps).
Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 110k dots), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (144×88×72 mm)) and has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).
However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), lacks built-in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 300 shots) and much worse macro focusing (9.0 cm vs 4.0 cm).
