The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is mostly gets compared to super zooms and pro digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S2500HD and the FinePix x20) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L840)

Competitor classes

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 37.2x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$238

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much longer battery life: 590 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 3.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 538 g vs 157 g

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and lacks and external mic jack.

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$659

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash