As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts, super zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Samsung (such as the WB350F and the DV150F) and Fujifilm (such as the Finepix Z900EXR and the FinePix XP10)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 103x62x28 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks a built-in HDR feature and lacks built-in panoramas.

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$232

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

Fujifilm FinePix XP10

Fujifilm FinePix XP10
1 year older
$179

Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the XP10 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 96x64x23 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 157 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1
1 year newer
$410

Significant advantages of the DMC-LF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x62x28 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the DMC-LF1 and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm XQ1

Fujifilm XQ1
1 year newer
$286

Significant advantages of the XQ1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the XQ1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 100x58x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the XQ1 and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very fast continuous shooting: 12 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix XP100

Fujifilm FinePix XP100
similar age
$228

Significant advantages of the XP100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly longer battery life: 300 shots vs 220 shots
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 102x71x27 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the XP100 and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
similar age
$250

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't record movies in 24p and lacks built-in panoramas.

Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F
2 years newer
$140 - $209

Significant advantages of the WB350F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the WB350F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the WB350F and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
7 months newer
$144

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly longer battery life: 380 shots vs 220 shots
  • Better image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$80 - $220

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS
similar age
$140

Significant advantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Better image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the A4000 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix JZ700

Fujifilm FinePix JZ700
1 year newer
$112

Significant advantages of the JZ700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the JZ700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the JZ700 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
similar age
$120

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 2.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs ultra compact 93x54x13 mm) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
similar age
$148

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
2 years older
$179

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$145

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Good image stabilization: Digital vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$91

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$124

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$273

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs large 130x90x126 mm), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.3 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 320 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$185

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 110x73x81 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
2 years newer
$170 - $330

Significant advantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly more zoom: 50x vs 5x
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x87x116 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9400W and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR
1 year newer
$302 - $320

Significant advantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 135x101x146 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS50EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd
4 years older

Significant advantages of the S1000fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S1000fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the S1000fd and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Standard size 102x73x67 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR
1 year newer
$284

Significant advantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 131x97x126 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS35EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR
1 year older
$417

Significant advantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 130x90x126 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS20 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 128x72x57 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes much higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 1.9 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.4), lacks built-in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 300 shots) and slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm).

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR
6 months newer
$215

Significant advantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F800EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Pentax EI-200

Placeholder
12 years older

Significant advantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much lower true resolution: 1.9 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the EI-200 and Z1000EXR

  • None found