As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, pro digicams, ultra compacts, super zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX270 HS and the PowerShot S200) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L840 and the Coolpix AW120)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (100×59×26 mm)), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 5 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200
2 years newer
$341

Significant advantages of the S200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 1.9 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the S200 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (100×59×26 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
8 months newer
$332

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Larger: Compact (99×59×27 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S110 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120
2 years newer
$400

Significant advantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (110×66×26 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the AW120 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"

Olympus TG-630 iHS

Olympus TG-630 iHS
1 year newer
$286

Significant advantages of the TG-630 iHS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the TG-630 iHS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 5 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the TG-630 iHS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (98×66×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$128

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 157 g

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$175

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS, doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
1 year newer
$242

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX270 HS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Olympus VH-520

Olympus VH-520
1 year newer
$191

Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VH-520 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
2 years newer
$251

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • More zoom: 30x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS
4 months older
$190

Significant advantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    2. Sensor shift
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX150 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX150 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$450

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F
1 year newer
$225

Significant advantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the WB250F and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$903

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$258

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 200 fps vs None
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Inexpensive: $258.01 vs $351.84

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (93×54×13 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$119 - $175

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$230

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
similar age
$149

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$602

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 29.3x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$188 - $229

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly more zoom: 37.2x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Light weight: 538 g vs 157 g
  • Inexpensive: $188.00 vs $351.84

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
3 years newer
$1,295 - $1,398

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 II and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
2 years newer
$169

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 508 g vs 157 g
  • Inexpensive: $169.00 vs $351.84

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
1 year newer
$299

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L820 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$140

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Larger: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 110k dots), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (144×88×72 mm)) and has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), lacks built-in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 300 shots) and much worse macro focusing (9.0 cm vs 4.0 cm).

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR
6 months newer
$296

Significant advantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F800EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Light weight: 208 g vs 157 g

Ricoh RDC-200G

Placeholder
11 years older

Significant advantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 4.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the RDC-200G and Z1000EXR

  • None found