As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to pro digicams, super zooms, ultra compacts and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cybershot DSC-RX100 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX20) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L840 and the Coolpix L820)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (100×59×26 mm)) and has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.6), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 320 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p and is less popular.

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
5 months newer
$398

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (102×58×36 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$149

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No built-in flash
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710
1 year newer
$105

Significant advantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-W710 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×55×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Casio Exilim EX-Z4

Placeholder
8 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-Z4 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z4 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3.5"
  • Does not take movies: None vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the EX-Z4 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (87×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$1,076

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200
2 years newer
$400

Significant advantages of the S200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S200 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$349

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 200 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Inexpensive: $349.00 vs $340.80

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$509

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$216

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 37.2x vs 5x
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Light weight: 538 g vs 157 g
  • Inexpensive: $215.99 vs $340.80

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$230

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
1 year newer
$270

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L820 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 157 g

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
2 years newer
$229

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 3.6" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 508 g vs 157 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (96×59×15 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$299

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$370

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$112 - $162

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$600

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$300

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (106×61×33 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 18x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$399

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Olympus VH-520

Olympus VH-520
1 year newer
$150

Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VH-520 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (101×60×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 138 g vs 157 g

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS
1 year newer
$451

Significant advantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the IXUS 255 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (97×56×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 144 g vs 157 g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
2 years newer
$340

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (111×64×34 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
1 year newer
$230

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (92×52×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 124 g vs 157 g

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F
1 year newer
$295

Significant advantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • More zoom: 18x vs 5x
  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly heavier: 226 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the WB250F and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Compact (107×62×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"