As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, super zooms, travel zooms, pro digicams, mirrorless and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix HS35EXR and the FinePix XP10) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-XS1 and the Lumix FH10)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 110x66x25 mm), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120
2 years newer
$240 - $347

Significant advantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x66x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the AW120 and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$203

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps
  • Smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

Fujifilm FinePix XP10

Fujifilm FinePix XP10
1 year older
$193

Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the XP10 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 96x64x23 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm FinePix

Fujifilm FinePix Z110
similar age

Significant advantages of the FinePix (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the FinePix and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x58x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot A2500

Canon PowerShot A2500
1 year newer
$180

Significant advantages of the A2500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A2500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A2500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x56x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 125 g vs 157 g

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
2 years newer
$798

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 101x58x41 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$105

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$80

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Canon ELPH 530 HS
similar age
$180

Significant advantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots much slower: 2.6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ELPH 530 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
similar age
$145 - $218

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$143

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Good image stabilization: Digital vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
similar age
$148

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is much smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs large 131x97x126 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 5") and is much lighter (157 g vs 687 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 480 fps) and much lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR
1 year newer
$285

Significant advantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Much longer battery life: 600 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 131x97x126 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS35EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.0), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and lacks a built-in HDR feature.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
2 years newer
$108 - $115

Significant advantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Better image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-W830 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix F850EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F850EXR
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the F850EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the F850EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F850EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F665 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 12 fps
  • Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
2 years newer
$240 - $359

Significant advantages of the Camera 2 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much larger screen: 4.8" vs 3.5"
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the Camera 2 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Camera 2 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 4.8" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS
similar age
$130

Significant advantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Better image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A4000 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
7 months newer
$134

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly longer battery life: 380 shots vs 220 shots
  • Better image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 118x77x50 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 350 g).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/1.4), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$398

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Nikon Coolpix P7800
1 year newer
$547

Significant advantages of the P7800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the P7800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly heavier: 399 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the P7800 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
6 months newer
$328

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.4 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-LX7 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a touch screen, is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs mid size 119x65x36 mm), is thinner (0.7" vs 1.4") and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,152k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 20 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm).

Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000
2 years newer
$400 - $448 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A5000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Shoots RAW
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the A5000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A5000 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 109x62x35 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 210 g vs 157 g

Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX2000
1 year newer
$230 20-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX2000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,152k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the NX2000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly thicker: 1.4" vs 0.7"
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the NX2000 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3.7" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size 119x65x36 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 128x72x57 mm), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes much higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 1.2 MP).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.4) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Pentax EI-200

Placeholder
12 years older

Significant advantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much lower true resolution: 1.9 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the EI-200 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Ricoh RDC-4300

Ricoh RDC-4300
13 years older

Significant advantages of the RDC-4300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the RDC-4300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much lower true resolution: 1.2 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the RDC-4300 and Z1000EXR

  • None found