As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to waterproofs, ultra compacts, travel zooms and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z808EXR and the FinePix JZ200) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 and the Cybershot DSC-RX100)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 110x66x25 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 6.9 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/1.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 12 MP), has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots significantly slower: 1.6 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Fujifilm XF1

Fujifilm XF1
7 months newer
$220

Significant advantages of the XF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the XF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 108x62x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the XF1 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the XF1 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix JX500

Fujifilm Finepix JX500
similar age

Significant advantages of the JX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the JX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the JX500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Finepix JX500 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
similar age

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P310 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P310 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120
2 years newer
$289 - $340

Significant advantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x66x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AW120 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW120 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
5 months newer
$498

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 101x58x35 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is newer (january, 2012 vs february, 2010) and has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5
1 year older
$300

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX5 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX5 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX5 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very small: Ultra compact 94x57x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$198 - $212

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Ultra compact 96x59x15 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.6 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't take 3D photos.

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$100

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3
1 year newer
$94

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS3 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS3 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS3 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Canon ELPH 530 HS
similar age
$181

Significant advantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 2.6 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 530 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$266

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$98 - $110

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung ST72

Samsung ST72
1 year newer
$78

Significant advantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the ST72 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung ST72 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 110x60x31 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.2 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 18x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200
similar age

Significant advantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the JZ200 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the JZ200 vs the Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
2 years newer
$179 - $204

Significant advantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 340 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x58x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$275 - $300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x61x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$150 - $220

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 95x58x26 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F
1 year newer
$110

Significant advantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly more zoom: 18x vs 5x
  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly heavier: 226 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the WB250F and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 107x62x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Samsung WB250F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix S9500
1 year newer
$217

Significant advantages of the S9500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much more zoom: 22x vs 5x
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the S9500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x60x31 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is much smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs large 131x91x126 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 6.7 fps) and slightly higher boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 22 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10
1 year older
$400

Significant advantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 131x91x126 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS10 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the HS10 vs the Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
2 years newer
$160 - $227

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • More zoom: 34.8x vs 5x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 22 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR