As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to super zooms, pro digicams, waterproofs and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z808EXR and the FinePix S2500HD) and Pentax (such as the Optio LS465)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs none), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), is slightly more expensive ($335.40 vs $149.00) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$149

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No built-in flash
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Casio Exilim EX-Z4

Placeholder
8 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-Z4 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z4 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3.5"
  • Does not take movies: None vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the EX-Z4 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (87×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix JX200

Fujifilm FinePix JX200
1 year older
$180

Significant advantages of the JX200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the JX200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the JX200 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×55×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710
1 year newer
$125

Significant advantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-W710 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×55×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 35x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Larger: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot SX30 IS

Canon PowerShot SX30 IS
1 year older
$400

Significant advantages of the SX30 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 35x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX30 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (123×92×108 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the SX30 IS and Z1000EXR

  • Inexpensive: $400.00 vs $335.40

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$230

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 37.2x vs 5x
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 538 g vs 157 g
  • Inexpensive: $229.99 vs $335.40

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$449

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 200 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Inexpensive: $448.80 vs $335.40

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$509

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Has an external mic jack
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.3"), is slightly less expensive ($335.40 vs $634.20) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (96×59×15 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$634

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Ultra compact (96×59×15 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is much smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (111×64×34 mm)), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.2 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.4").

However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots).

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$429

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
2 years newer
$340

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (111×64×34 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Z1000EXR

  • None found