Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts, pro digicams, super zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 and the Cyber-shot DSC-WX300) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z808EXR and the Finepix X10)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 110x66x25 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR 1 year older	Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix AW120 2 years newer $297 - $548	Significant advantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Compact 110x66x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the AW120 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW120 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR 9 months older $147	Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None Can create panoramas in-camera Has in-camera HDR Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix P310 similar age $256	Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9 Takes 3D photos Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm No touch screen common strengths of the P310 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P310 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon ELPH 320 HS similar age $170 - $250	Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9 Supports 24p Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5" Shoots significantly slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z90 10 months older	Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Z90 vs the Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 103x59x32 mm), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 15x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 1 year newer $148	Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR) Takes 3D photos Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR Very small: Super compact 92x52x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR similar age	Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly larger: Compact 103x59x32 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the F665 EXR and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the F665 EXR vs the Z1000EXR
Olympus VH-520 1 year newer $89 - $96	Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR) Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None Can create panoramas in-camera Has in-camera HDR Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the VH-520 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 100x60x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Olympus VH-520 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 1 year newer $223 - $328	Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x Much longer battery life: 500 shots vs 220 shots Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 96x55x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon ELPH 310 HS 4 months older	Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Supports 24p Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the 310 HS and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS similar age $225 - $300	Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a GPS Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x Supports 24p Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Compact 106x61x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), lacks a built in HDR feature and lacks a built in panoramas.

Samsung DV150F 1 year newer $89 - $99	Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9 Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix FH10 1 year newer $105	Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z20fd 4 years older	Significant advantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5" Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the Z20fd and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Z20fd vs the Z1000EXR
Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 similar age $199	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Takes 3D photos Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 1 year newer $198 - $298	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 similar age $205	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Takes 3D photos Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm Finepix X10 4 months older $323 - $425	Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Shoots RAW Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5" No touch screen Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7" common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix x20 1 year newer $499 - $598	Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Shoots RAW Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5" No touch screen Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7" common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the x20 vs the Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 111x75x91 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 6.7 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.0), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 22 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L820 1 year newer $160 - $279	Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the L820 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix L830 2 years newer $227 - $255	Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Significantly better wide angle: 22 mm vs 28 mm Significantly more zoom: 34.8x vs 5x Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.5"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 61k dots), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 144x88x72 mm) and has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and doesn't support an external flash.

Ricoh RDC-200G 11 years older	Significant advantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly better macro capability: 4 cm vs 9 cm Supports an external flash Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift common strengths of the RDC-200G and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Ricoh RDC-200G vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Kodak EasyShare CX7220 8 years older	Significant advantages of the CX7220 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the CX7220 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much worse macro capability: 60 cm vs 9 cm Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 28 mm common strengths of the CX7220 and Z1000EXR Light weight: 195 g vs 157 g
	Compare the Kodak EasyShare CX7220 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR