The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is mostly gets compared to super zooms, travel zooms and pro digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix S2500HD and the Finepix X10) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix L840)

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 37.2x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$179 - $199

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much longer battery life: 590 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 538 g vs 157 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (111×64×34 mm)), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.4").

However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
2 years newer
$340

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (111×64×34 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
4 months older
$225

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is newer (january 2012 vs september 2011) and is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2").

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 300 shots).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$568

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 200 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash