As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to mirrorless, boutiques, waterproofs, ultra compacts, travel zooms and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Alpha A5000 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX20) and Canon (such as the ELPH 320 HS and the PowerShot G1X)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 4 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and doesn't take 3D photos.

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$219

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm FinePix JX200

Fujifilm FinePix JX200
1 year older
$180

Significant advantages of the JX200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the JX200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 1.7 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the JX200 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×55×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 130 g vs 157 g

Casio Exilim EX-Z4

Placeholder
8 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-Z4 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Better macro capability: 6.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z4 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the EX-Z4 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (87×57×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
10 months older
$170

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 0.8 fps vs 12 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Shoots much slower: 1.6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Samsung MV900F MultiView

Samsung MV900F MultiView
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×60×17 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.5").

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs APS-C 22.3x14.9mm).

Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000
2 years newer
$287 (body only)
$398 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A5000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the A5000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A5000 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (110×63×36 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 210 g vs 157 g

Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100
2 years newer
$348 (body only)
$498 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A5100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the A5100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the A5100 and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (110×63×36 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 0.7"

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
2 years newer
$448 (body only)
$598 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1.8" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the A6000 and Z1000EXR

  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Light weight: 285 g vs 157 g
  • Each has a built-in flash

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10
3 years newer
$449 - $480 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 460k dots
  • Supports 24p
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the EOS M10 and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Mid size (108×67×35 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 0.7"

Nikon 1 J5

Nikon 1 J5
3 years newer
$497 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the 1 J5 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 12 fps
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the 1 J5 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the 1 J5 and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Fairly small: Compact (98×60×32 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 0.7"

Samsung NX3000

Samsung NX3000
2 years newer
$376 (body only)
$299 - $365 20-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NX3000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the NX3000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the NX3000 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×66×39 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 230 g vs 157 g

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to boutique competitors include: it has way more more zoom (5x vs 4x), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×81×65 mm)), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.9 fps).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs four thirds 18.7x14mm).

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X
similar age
$589

Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse macro capability: 20.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Shoots much slower: 1.9 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the G1X and Z1000EXR

  • Incredible zoom: 4x vs 5x
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$228

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Ultra compact (96×56×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$228

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Ultra compact (96×59×15 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2012 vs july 2011).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (93×54×13 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
similar age
$149

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55
5 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX55 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30
5 months older
$160

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-W530

Sony Cybershot W530
10 months older
$190

Significant advantages of the DSC-W530 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W530 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W530 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
2 years newer
$165

Significant advantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 340 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Compact (100×58×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
4 months older
$329

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix S6800

Nikon Coolpix S6800
2 years newer
$149

Significant advantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S6800 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Compact (97×58×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Olympus VH-520

Olympus VH-520
1 year newer
$138

Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VH-520 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (101×60×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Fast continuous shooting: 15 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
1 year newer
$275

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Much longer battery life: 500 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Compact (96×55×25 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS
1 year newer
$401

Significant advantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 6.2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the IXUS 255 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (97×56×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is much smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs professional size (123×87×116 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 4.6") and is much lighter (157 g vs 813 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 50x), records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs UHD @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm) and has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,228k dots).

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
2 years newer
$212

Significant advantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 50x vs 5x
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (123×87×116 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9400W and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
3 years newer
$1,114 - $1,198

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,228k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 II and Z1000EXR

  • None found