As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S6500 and the Coolpix L830) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX510 HS and the ELPH 500 HS)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 101x58x35 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm) and is less popular.

Casio Exilim EX-Z1000

Casio Exilim EX-Z1000
5 years older

Significant advantages of the EX-Z1000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z1000 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the EX-Z1000 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 92x58x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Casio Exilim EX-Z1000 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
1 year older
$199

Significant advantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots slower: 3.4 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 500 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 500 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix JX500

Fujifilm Finepix JX500
similar age

Significant advantages of the JX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the JX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the JX500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Finepix JX500 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90
4 months older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots slower: 3.7 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the DMC-FX90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 102x56x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
5 months newer
$498

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 101x58x35 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 104x63x33 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.6 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 15x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$84 - $220

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 95x58x26 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 153 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200
similar age

Significant advantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the JZ200 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the JZ200 vs the Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR
1 year older
$233

Significant advantages of the F550 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the F550 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 104x63x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F550 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the F550 EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Canon ELPH 530 HS
similar age
$165

Significant advantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 2.6 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 530 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Ultra compact 86x54x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR
1 year newer
$199 - $336

Significant advantages of the F900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the F900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 105x61x36 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the F900EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F
1 year newer
$145

Significant advantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly more zoom: 18x vs 5x
  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly heavier: 226 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the WB250F and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 107x62x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Samsung WB250F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$92 - $138

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Digital vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$225

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$198 - $214

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$119

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 111x75x91 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.8 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.0), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 22 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
1 year newer
$199 - $250

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 0 cm vs 9 cm
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the SX510 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 349 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
2 years newer
$227

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 22 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 34.8x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR