As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, super zooms and pro digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-W710 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX30) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-TZ60 and the Lumix ZS25)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p and is slightly more expensive ($359.07 vs $180.00).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710
1 year newer
$113

Significant advantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the DSC-W710 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×55×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 114 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$139

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$180

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Shoots much slower: 1.6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Kodak LS420

Placeholder
9 years older

Significant advantages of the LS420 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the LS420 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.6" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the LS420 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×46×29 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 160 g vs 157 g

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200
2 years newer
$400

Significant advantages of the S200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the S200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 1.9 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the S200 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (100×59×26 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (96×59×15 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$228

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$120 - $174

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$171

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$565

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$230

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
similar age
$135

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (106×61×33 mm)), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 8 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
1 year newer
$242

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×63×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX270 HS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60
2 years newer
$251

Significant advantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TZ60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (111×64×34 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-TZ60 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F
1 year newer
$250

Significant advantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the WB250F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly heavier: 226 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the WB250F and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Compact (107×62×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
1 year newer
$238

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (92×52×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 124 g vs 157 g

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
1 year newer
$215

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the ZS25 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 193 g vs 157 g

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$483

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
2 years newer
$169

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 22 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 508 g vs 157 g
  • Inexpensive: $169.00 vs $359.07

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
1 year newer
$299

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Larger: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L820 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 470 g vs 157 g

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$140

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$189 - $229

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much longer battery life: 590 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Light weight: 538 g vs 157 g
  • Inexpensive: $189.00 vs $359.07

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$258

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 200 fps vs None
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Inexpensive: $258.01 vs $359.07

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$903

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash