As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, super zooms and pro digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix HS10 and the FinePix Z90) and Samsung (such as the DV150F and the ST72)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 100x59x29 mm), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.7 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 12 MP), has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), lacks a built in HDR feature and slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm).

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
10 months older
$97

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Z90 vs the Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix JX500

Fujifilm Finepix JX500
similar age

Significant advantages of the JX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the JX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the JX500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Finepix JX500 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
5 months newer
$498

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 101x58x35 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120
1 year newer
$447 - $449

Significant advantages of the S120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the S120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Larger: Compact 100x59x29 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S120 and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot S120 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90
4 months older

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots slower: 3.7 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the DMC-FX90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 102x56x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.6), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks a built in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos and slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm).

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$90 - $110

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Digital vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
similar age
$159 - $175

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 2.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
similar age
$124 - $170

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung ST72

Samsung ST72
1 year newer
$97

Significant advantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly longer battery life: 320 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the ST72 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Digital vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Samsung ST72 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z20fd

Fujifilm FinePix Z20fd
4 years older

Significant advantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the Z20fd and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Z20fd vs the Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 105x61x36 mm), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.4").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200
similar age

Significant advantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the JZ200 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the JZ200 vs the Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$84 - $220

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 95x58x26 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 153 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR
1 year newer
$194 - $336

Significant advantages of the F900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the F900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 105x61x36 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the F900EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Olympus VH-520

Olympus VH-520
1 year newer
$89 - $96

Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VH-520 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 100x60x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Olympus VH-520 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR
2 years older

Significant advantages of the F70EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the F70EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F70EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x59x23 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the F70EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR
similar age
$329

Significant advantages of the F770 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the F770 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 105x63x36 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F770 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the FinePix F770 EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is much smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs large 131x91x126 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.8 fps) and has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10
1 year older
$400

Significant advantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 131x91x126 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS10 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the HS10 vs the Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
1 year newer
$199 - $250

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 0 cm vs 9 cm
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the SX510 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 349 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs mid size 119x73x51 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 350 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/1.4), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$335 - $591

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
6 months newer
$362 - $398

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.4 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX7 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-LX7 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix P7700

Nikon Coolpix P7700
7 months newer
$469

Significant advantages of the P7700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the P7700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly heavier: 392 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the P7700 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P7700 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR