Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR Competitors

5x, f/3.9, 28 mm

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts and pro digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 and the Cyber-shot DSC-T900) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z700EXR and the FinePix Z808EXR)

Competitor classes

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.3"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.6 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't have a screen which flips out, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), lacks a built in HDR feature and lacks a built in panoramas.

Samsung MV900F MultiView

Samsung MV900F MultiView
6 months newer
$180

Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x17 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Samsung MV900F MultiView vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z700EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z700EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z700EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z700EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z700EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Z700EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Olympus VG-160

Olympus VG-160
similar age
$72 - $100

Significant advantages of the VG-160 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the VG-160 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VG-160 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Olympus VG-160 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$193

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix AW110

Nikon Coolpix AW110
1 year newer
$240 - $249

Significant advantages of the AW110 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the AW110 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x65x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AW110 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW110 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.2 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), doesn't record movies in 24p and lacks a built in panoramas.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
1 year newer
$138 - $198

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
7 months newer
$109 - $165

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly longer battery life: 380 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS
similar age
$90 - $120

Significant advantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the A4000 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A4000 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot WX60

Sony Cybershot WX60
1 year newer
$185

Significant advantages of the WX60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the WX60 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX60 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot WX60 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$208 - $300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Supports 24p
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 3.2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$157 - $170

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.8 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$199 - $299

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-W530

Sony Cybershot W530
10 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-W530 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 4 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W530 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-W530 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot W530 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
similar age
$270 - $299

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$191 - $348

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot W570

Sony Cybershot DSC-W570
10 months older
$160

Significant advantages of the W570 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the W570 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the W570 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-W570 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs mid size 114x77x45 mm), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.3 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/1.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1
1 year older
$200 - $300

Significant advantages of the XZ-1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the XZ-1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the XZ-1 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus XZ-1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix P7100

Nikon Coolpix P7100
4 months older
$359 - $450

Significant advantages of the P7100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the P7100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P7100 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P7100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR