Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to boutiques, travel zooms, ultra compacts, pro digicams and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F900EXR and the Finepix Z900EXR) and Samsung (such as the PL200 and the WB150F)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.4 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm) and is less popular.

Samsung PL200 1 year older	Significant advantages of the PL200 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the PL200 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly worse wide angle: 31 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 800 x 592 @ 20fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the PL200 and Z1000EXR Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Samsung PL200 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR 9 months older $208	Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None Has in-camera HDR Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR 1 year older	Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Shoots significantly slower: 1.6 fps vs 12 fps Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR
Canon ELPH 300 HS 1 year older $152	Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9 Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Supports 24p Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Shoots significantly slower: 3.4 fps vs 12 fps common strengths of the 300 HS and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 92x55x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Canon ELPH 300 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS similar age $146 - $183	Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9 Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Supports 24p Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Shoots significantly slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon ELPH 320 HS similar age $124 - $149	Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9 Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Supports 24p Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5" Shoots significantly slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to boutique competitors include: it has way more more zoom (5x vs 1x), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is much smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x81x65 mm) and has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 24 MP), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot G1X similar age $649	Significant advantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Much longer battery life: 700 shots vs 220 shots Has a flip-out screen Significant disadvantages of the G1X (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Much larger: Standard size 117x81x65 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm No touch screen common strengths of the G1X and Z1000EXR Great zoom: 4x vs 5x Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Canon PowerShot G1X vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 8 months newer $2,780 - $2,798	Significant advantages of the DSC-RX1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Much larger sensor: Full frame 35.8x23.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much less zoom: 1x vs 5x Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Much larger: Standard size 113x65x70 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the DSC-RX1 and Z1000EXR Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 105x61x36 mm), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.8 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.6 fps).

However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), lacks a built in HDR feature and lacks a built in panoramas.

Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR 1 year newer $370 - $399	Significant advantages of the F900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much more zoom: 20x vs 5x Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the F900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Compact 105x61x36 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the F900EXR and Z1000EXR Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 12 fps Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the F900EXR vs the Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F850EXR 1 year newer $279 - $299	Significant advantages of the F850EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much more zoom: 20x vs 5x Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the F850EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Compact 105x61x36 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the F850EXR and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the F850EXR vs the Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V similar age $300 - $378	Significant advantages of the DSC-HX20V (vs the Z1000EXR) Much more zoom: 20x vs 5x Has a GPS Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the DSC-HX20V (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Compact 107x62x35 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the DSC-HX20V and Z1000EXR Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon PowerShot A4000 IS similar age $99 - $123	Significant advantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS common strengths of the A4000 IS and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 95x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7" Light weight: 145 g vs 157 g
	Compare the Canon PowerShot A4000 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS similar age $159	Significant advantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/3.9 Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Shoots significantly slower: 2.6 fps vs 12 fps common strengths of the ELPH 530 HS and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Ultra compact 86x54x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix T400 similar age $156	Significant advantages of the T400 (vs the Z1000EXR) Wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/3.9 Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the T400 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Significantly larger: Compact 104x59x29 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm No touch screen common strengths of the T400 and Z1000EXR Light weight: 159 g vs 157 g
	Compare the T400 vs the Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs ultra compact 93x54x13 mm) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot WX50 similar age $100 - $190	Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9 Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 similar age $218 - $219	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 similar age $170	Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9 Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Have touch screens
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 similar age $180 - $330	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Have touch screens
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix FH10 1 year newer $99	Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significantly lighter: 100 g vs 157 g Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 2 years older	Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm No touch screen Shoots significantly slower: 1.8 fps vs 12 fps common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.3 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a much smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps).

Fujifilm Finepix X10 4 months older $549	Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Much larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Shoots RAW Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7" common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
	Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix P7100 4 months older $299	Significant advantages of the P7100 (vs the Z1000EXR) Shoots RAW Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Has an external mic jack Significant disadvantages of the P7100 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Shoots much slower: 1.3 fps vs 12 fps common strengths of the P7100 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P7100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is much smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs large 130x90x126 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 7 fps) and has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has way more less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 320 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR 1 year older	Significant advantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Significantly more zoom: 30x vs 5x Has a flip-out screen Significant disadvantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Large 130x90x126 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the HS20 EXR and Z1000EXR Capture very high resolution images: 10.6 MP vs 10.6 MP Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the HS20 EXR vs the Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix P520 1 year newer $427	Significant advantages of the P520 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much more zoom: 41.7x vs 5x Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Has a flip-out screen Significant disadvantages of the P520 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Professional size 125x84x102 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm No touch screen Significantly smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5" common strengths of the P520 and Z1000EXR Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5" Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P520 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR