As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II and the Cyber-shot DSC-WX300) and Canon (such as the IXUS 255 HS and the ELPH 320 HS)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 5 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks built-in panoramas.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810
2 years newer
$80

Significant advantages of the DSC-W810 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W810 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots much slower: 1 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the DSC-W810 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×53×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 120 g vs 157 g

Nikon Coolpix S100

Nikon Coolpix S100
4 months older
$179

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Shorter battery life: 150 shots vs 220 shots
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S100 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×65×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$220

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
10 months older
$110

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 0.8 fps vs 12 fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Nikon Coolpix P300

Nikon Coolpix P300
1 year older
$163

Significant advantages of the P300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the P300 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T33

Placeholder
7 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T33 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T33 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the DSC-T33 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (99×61×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 150 g vs 157 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (93×54×13 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$228 - $270

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$118

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
similar age
$185

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55
5 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX55 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX30
5 months older
$240

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-WX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$295

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
1 year newer
$330

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much longer battery life: 500 shots vs 220 shots
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500
3 years newer
$298 - $365

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS
1 year newer
$392

Significant advantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the IXUS 255 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
2 years newer
$170 - $248

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX350 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX350 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX350 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus Stylus SZ-15

Olympus Stylus SZ-15
1 year newer
$131

Significant advantages of the SZ-15 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SZ-15 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the SZ-15 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
1 year newer
$230

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is much smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs large (135×101×146 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 5.7").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs UHD @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm) and has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
3 years newer
$1,163 - $1,298

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,228k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 II and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 14 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$380

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR
1 year newer
$435

Significant advantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (135×101×146 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS50EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS