As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to pro digicams, travel zooms, ultra compacts and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z808EXR and the XF1) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX260 HS and the PowerShot ELPH 340 HS)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 99x67x23 mm), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.6 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/1.8), lacks a built in panoramas, slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 3 cm), doesn't shoot RAW and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 30 seconds).

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Fujifilm XF1

Fujifilm XF1
7 months newer
$219 - $225

Significant advantages of the XF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the XF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 108x62x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the XF1 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the XF1 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm XQ1

Fujifilm XQ1
1 year newer
$368 - $369

Significant advantages of the XQ1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the XQ1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 100x58x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the XQ1 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the XQ1 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
10 months older
$167

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Z90 vs the Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$298

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix XP20

Fujifilm FinePix XP20
similar age

Significant advantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the XP20 and Z1000EXR

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the XP20 vs the Z1000EXR

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 12 MP).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$399 - $574

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$500 - $599

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the x20 vs the Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 110x60x31 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.2 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.2").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.4), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$200 - $300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x61x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
2 years newer
$179 - $204

Significant advantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 340 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x58x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$100 - $220

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 95x58x26 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix S9500
1 year newer
$217

Significant advantages of the S9500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much more zoom: 22x vs 5x
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the S9500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x60x31 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR
similar age
$310

Significant advantages of the F770 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the F770 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 105x63x36 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F770 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the FinePix F770 EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
similar age
$170 - $189

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 2.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Ultra compact 87x54x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.6), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), lacks a built in HDR feature and lacks a built in panoramas.

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$85 - $110

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$300 - $360

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung ST72

Samsung ST72
1 year newer
$9,795

Significant advantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the ST72 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung ST72 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
similar age
$150

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$86

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Lighter: 103 g vs 157 g

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 110k dots), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 144x88x72 mm) and has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.4), slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 4 cm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and doesn't support an external flash.

Pentax EI-200

Placeholder
12 years older

Significant advantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much lower true resolution: 1.9 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the EI-200 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Pentax EI-200 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Ricoh RDC-200G

Placeholder
11 years older

Significant advantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 4 cm vs 9 cm
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the RDC-200G and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Ricoh RDC-200G vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR