Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to waterproofs, ultra compacts, travel zooms and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Panasonic (such as the Lumix ZS30 and the Lumix LF1) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 and the Cybershot DSC-TX66)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 103x62x28 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 0.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 20 MP), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Panasonic Lumix LF1 1 year newer $295 - $499	Significant advantages of the LF1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the LF1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Compact 103x62x28 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the LF1 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix LF1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix S1200pj 4 months older $160	Significant advantages of the S1200pj (vs the Z1000EXR) Can create panoramas in-camera Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the S1200pj (vs the Z1000EXR) Much narrower aperture: f/5.0 vs f/3.9 Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the S1200pj and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S1200pj vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon PowerShot S110 8 months newer $238 - $350	Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Supports 24p Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Larger: Compact 99x59x27 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7" common strengths of the S110 and Z1000EXR Have touch screens Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Canon PowerShot S110 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix XP10 1 year older	Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Waterproof Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift common strengths of the XP10 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the XP10 vs the Z1000EXR
Samsung MV900F MultiView 6 months newer $225 - $250	Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9 Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Has a flip-out screen Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x17 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Samsung MV900F MultiView vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II 1 year newer $661 - $698	Significant advantages of the RX100 II (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9 Much larger sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 10.6 MP Significant disadvantages of the RX100 II (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Compact 101x58x38 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the RX100 II and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0") and takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a much lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 similar age $189 - $348	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very small: Ultra compact 96x56x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 1 year newer $230 - $269	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Very small: Ultra compact 96x59x15 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.8 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't take 3D photos.

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 similar age $199	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Samsung DV150F 1 year newer $91 - $99	Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9 Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 2 years older	Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 1 year newer $131	Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS similar age $105 - $117	Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Supports 24p Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Shoots slower: 2.8 fps vs 12 fps common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Canon ELPH 520 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z300 2 years older $164	Significant advantages of the Z300 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the Z300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the Z300 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Sensor shift vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Z300 vs the Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 0.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Panasonic Lumix ZS30 1 year newer $300 - $399	Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a GPS Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR Have touch screens Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 similar age $87	Significant advantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9 Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the JZ200 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the JZ200 vs the Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix S6300 similar age $105	Significant advantages of the S6300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9 Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the S6300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the S6300 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix S9300 similar age $180	Significant advantages of the S9300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a GPS Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the S9300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the S9300 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS 7 months newer $104 - $219	Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm Significantly longer battery life: 380 shots vs 220 shots Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix ZS15 similar age $224	Significant advantages of the ZS15 (vs the Z1000EXR) Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the ZS15 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the ZS15 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs professional size 123x87x116 mm), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 6.7 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.9), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 40x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 480 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix S8200 1 year newer $201 - $249	Significant advantages of the S8200 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9 Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 5x Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None Significant disadvantages of the S8200 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Professional size 123x87x116 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the S8200 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the S8200 vs the Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix L830 2 years newer $267 - $297	Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Significantly more zoom: 34.8x vs 5x Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix L820 1 year newer $179 - $279	Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots More zoom: 29.3x vs 5x Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the L820 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Light weight: 470 g vs 157 g
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR