As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SX260 HS and the PowerShot SX270 HS) and Pentax (such as the Optio LS465)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (109×46×29 mm)) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps), takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 20 MP), doesn't record movies in 24p and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$149

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 122 g vs 157 g

Samsung MV900F MultiView

Samsung MV900F MultiView
6 months newer

Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (99×60×17 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710
1 year newer
$143

Significant advantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the DSC-W710 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (97×55×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 114 g vs 157 g

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$185

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×57×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Kodak LS420

Placeholder
9 years older

Significant advantages of the LS420 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the LS420 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.6" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the LS420 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×46×29 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 160 g vs 157 g

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
2 years newer
$798

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much larger: Compact (102×58×41 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (105×59×28 mm)), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 6.2 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$484

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
1 year newer
$179

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Much larger: Compact (106×63×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the SX270 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
1 year newer
$320

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the ZS25 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
1 year newer
$179

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (92×52×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS
1 year newer
$470

Significant advantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 6.2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the IXUS 255 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact (97×56×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$220

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a GPS

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), is slightly larger (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs ultra compact (96×59×15 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$228 - $259

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
similar age
$135

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55
5 months older

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX55 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX55 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$140

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$118 - $177

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$229 - $240

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • More zoom: 37.2x vs 5x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Inexpensive: $229.00 vs $364.26

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$140

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
3 years newer
$1,114 - $1,198

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,228k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX10 II (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Professional size (129×88×102 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX10 II and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
2 years newer
$176

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 22 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (111×76×91 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Inexpensive: $176.36 vs $364.26