As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, pro digicams, travel zooms and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F200EXR and the FinePix Z90) and Canon (such as the PowerShot A2500 and the PowerShot ELPH 110 HS)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 110x66x25 mm), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks a built in panoramas.

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
2 years older
$387

Significant advantages of the F200EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the F200EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F200EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 98x59x23 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot A2500

Canon PowerShot A2500
1 year newer
$159

Significant advantages of the A2500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A2500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the A2500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x56x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
10 months older
$110

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120
2 years newer
$189 - $297

Significant advantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x66x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AW120 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
similar age
$199

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots significantly slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 93x57x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340
2 years newer
$347

Significant advantages of the P340 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the P340 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P340 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), lacks a built in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 290 shots) and slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm).

Samsung DV300F

Samsung DV300F
similar age
$314

Significant advantages of the DV300F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV300F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV300F and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$99 - $110

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Samsung ST72

Samsung ST72
1 year newer
$118

Significant advantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the ST72 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$131

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$266

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift

Casio Exilim EX-Z33

Casio Exilim EX-Z33
2 years older
$140

Significant advantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 848 x 480 vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the EX-Z33 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 12 MP).

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$599 - $620

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 105x59x28 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.3 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1
similar age
$187

Significant advantages of the DMC-SZ1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Much better macro capability: 4 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-SZ1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DMC-SZ1 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x59x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 131 g vs 157 g

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
2 years newer
$250 - $350

Significant advantages of the Camera 2 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much more zoom: 21x vs 5x
  • Much larger screen: 4.8" vs 3.5"

Significant disadvantages of the Camera 2 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 133x71x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Much heavier: 283 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the Camera 2 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 4.8" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Nikon Coolpix S6800

Nikon Coolpix S6800
2 years newer
$139 - $157

Significant advantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S6800 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
2 years newer
$149

Significant advantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 340 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x58x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$249

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix T550

Fujifilm FinePix T550
1 year newer
$123 - $150

Significant advantages of the T550 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the T550 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the T550 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact 99x57x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 141 g vs 157 g

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is much smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs large 131x91x126 mm), has a touch screen, is newer (january, 2012 vs february, 2010) and is thinner (0.7" vs 5").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps) and significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10
1 year older
$400

Significant advantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 131x91x126 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS10 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR
1 year older
$416

Significant advantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 130x90x126 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS20 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS