Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F665 EXR and the Finepix Z900EXR) and Olympus (such as the VH-520 and the TG-630 iHS)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.5"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 5 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have a screen which flips out, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR 9 months older $147	Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None Can create panoramas in-camera Has in-camera HDR Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T33 7 years older	Significant advantages of the DSC-T33 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T33 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the DSC-T33 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 99x61x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T33 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z90 10 months older	Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Z90 vs the Z1000EXR
Samsung MV900F MultiView 6 months newer	Significant advantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9 Has a flip-out screen Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Significant disadvantages of the MV900F MultiView (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the MV900F MultiView and Z1000EXR Larger than average screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x17 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Samsung MV900F MultiView vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix S80 1 year older $229	Significant advantages of the S80 (vs the Z1000EXR) Supports 24p Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Higher resolution screen: 819k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the S80 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS common strengths of the S80 and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 99x63x17 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S80 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Kodak LS420 9 years older	Significant advantages of the LS420 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the LS420 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 1.6" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 320 x 240 @ 19fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the LS420 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Kodak LS420 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 104x58x28 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 193 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR similar age	Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly larger: Compact 103x59x32 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the F665 EXR and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the F665 EXR vs the Z1000EXR
Olympus VH-520 1 year newer $89 - $96	Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR) Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Can create panoramas in-camera Has in-camera HDR Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the VH-520 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 100x60x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Olympus VH-520 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR similar age $300	Significant advantages of the F770 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a GPS Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the F770 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much larger: Compact 105x63x36 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the F770 EXR and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the FinePix F770 EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 1 year newer $148	Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR) Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Takes 3D photos Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR Very small: Super compact 92x52x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix ZS30 1 year newer $329 - $350	Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a GPS Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7" common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR Have touch screens Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix ZS25 1 year newer $220 - $240	Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Compact 104x58x28 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the ZS25 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS25 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), lacks a built in HDR feature and lacks a built in panoramas.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 1 year newer $198 - $298	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 similar age $199	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Takes 3D photos Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 2 years older	Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm No touch screen Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 1 year newer $131	Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Samsung ST72 1 year newer $75	Significant advantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9 Can create panoramas in-camera Significantly longer battery life: 320 shots vs 220 shots Significant disadvantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the ST72 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5" Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Samsung ST72 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix FH10 1 year newer $136	Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 110k dots), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 144x88x72 mm) and has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), lacks a built in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 300 shots) and significantly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 4 cm).

Ricoh RDC-200G 11 years older	Significant advantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly better macro capability: 4 cm vs 9 cm Supports an external flash Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift common strengths of the RDC-200G and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Ricoh RDC-200G vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR 6 months newer $240	Significant advantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the F800EXR and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the F800EXR vs the Z1000EXR