As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S6500 and the Coolpix S100) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix F665 EXR and the FinePix Z90)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 99x67x23 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.4 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks a built in panoramas.

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
10 months older
$167

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Z90 vs the Z1000EXR

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$159 - $250

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
5 months newer
$498

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 101x58x35 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S100

Nikon Coolpix S100
4 months older
$146

Significant advantages of the S100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the S100 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 99x65x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix XP20

Fujifilm FinePix XP20
similar age
$130

Significant advantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the XP20 and Z1000EXR

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the XP20 vs the Z1000EXR

Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
1 year older
$138

Significant advantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots slower: 3.4 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 500 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 500 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 0.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS, has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$84 - $220

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F665 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the F665 EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
7 months newer
$150 - $248

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly longer battery life: 380 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200
similar age

Significant advantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the JZ200 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the JZ200 vs the Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S6600

Nikon Coolpix S6600
1 year newer
$245 - $291

Significant advantages of the S6600 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the S6600 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S6600 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6600 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700
2 years newer
$269 - $297

Significant advantages of the S9700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S9700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9700 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9700 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.6), lacks a built in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 290 shots) and slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm).

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$85 - $150

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$131

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Lighter: 103 g vs 157 g

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70
similar age
$124 - $170

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX70 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-WX70 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung ST72

Samsung ST72
1 year newer
$65

Significant advantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the ST72 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung ST72 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$119

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is much smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs large 131x91x126 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.8 fps) and has boost light sensitivity (6,400 ISO vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,000 fps) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10
1 year older

Significant advantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large 131x91x126 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS10 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the HS10 vs the Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
1 year newer
$199 - $269

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 0 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Larger: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the SX510 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Standard size 104x70x80 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 349 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR