As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts, pro digicams, super zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 and the Cyber-shot DSC-WX300) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix Z808EXR and the Finepix X10)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 110x66x25 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and lacks a built in HDR feature.

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120
2 years newer
$297 - $548

Significant advantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 110x66x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the AW120 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW120 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$147

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
similar age
$256

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x58x32 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the P310 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P310 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$170 - $250

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots significantly slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z90

Fujifilm FinePix Z90
10 months older

Significant advantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Z90 vs the Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 103x59x32 mm), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3").

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 15x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80
1 year newer
$148

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX80 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX80 and Z1000EXR

  • Very small: Super compact 92x52x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x59x32 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F665 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the F665 EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Olympus VH-520

Olympus VH-520
1 year newer
$89 - $96

Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VH-520 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 100x60x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Olympus VH-520 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
1 year newer
$223 - $328

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Much longer battery life: 500 shots vs 220 shots
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-WX300 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 96x55x25 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
4 months older

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 310 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$225 - $300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x61x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), lacks a built in HDR feature and lacks a built in panoramas.

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$89 - $99

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$105

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z20fd

Fujifilm FinePix Z20fd
4 years older

Significant advantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Z20fd and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Z20fd vs the Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$199

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$198 - $298

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$205

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$323 - $425

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$499 - $598

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the x20 vs the Z1000EXR

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 111x75x91 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 6.7 fps) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.6").

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.0), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 34.8x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 22 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820
1 year newer
$160 - $279

Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots

Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the L820 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830
2 years newer
$227 - $255

Significant advantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 22 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 34.8x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the L830 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the L830 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x75x91 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix L830 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.5"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 61k dots), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 144x88x72 mm) and has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and doesn't support an external flash.

Ricoh RDC-200G

Placeholder
11 years older

Significant advantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 4 cm vs 9 cm
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the RDC-200G and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Ricoh RDC-200G vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Kodak EasyShare CX7220

Placeholder
8 years older

Significant advantages of the CX7220 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the CX7220 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse macro capability: 60 cm vs 9 cm
  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the CX7220 and Z1000EXR

  • Light weight: 195 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the Kodak EasyShare CX7220 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR