As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to travel zooms, ultra compacts and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the XF1 and the XQ1) and Canon (such as the PowerShot SX260 HS and the PowerShot ELPH 340 HS)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 99x67x23 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks a built in panoramas and slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 3 cm).

Fujifilm XF1

Fujifilm XF1
7 months newer
$219

Significant advantages of the XF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the XF1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 108x62x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the XF1 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the XF1 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm XQ1

Fujifilm XQ1
1 year newer
$368 - $369

Significant advantages of the XQ1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the XQ1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 100x58x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the XQ1 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the XQ1 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$165 - $170

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 320 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 94x57x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix XP20

Fujifilm FinePix XP20
similar age

Significant advantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the XP20 and Z1000EXR

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the XP20 vs the Z1000EXR

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$298

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T33

Placeholder
7 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T33 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T33 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the DSC-T33 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 99x61x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T33 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 104x58x28 mm), has a touch screen and is thinner (0.7" vs 1.1").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$239 - $300

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Compact 106x61x33 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
2 years newer
$179 - $204

Significant advantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 340 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 340 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x58x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
1 year newer
$190

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x58x28 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the ZS25 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS25 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$133

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 95x58x26 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix S6800

Nikon Coolpix S6800
2 years newer
$166 - $177

Significant advantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S6800 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6800 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 103x59x32 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F665 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the F665 EXR vs the Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't take 3D photos.

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$95

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$86

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Lighter: 103 g vs 157 g

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$120

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Lighter: 100 g vs 157 g
  • Much longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 4 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix FH10 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$300

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung ST72

Samsung ST72
1 year newer
$97

Significant advantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the ST72 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung ST72 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 110k dots), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 144x88x72 mm) and has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), significantly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 4 cm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and doesn't support an external flash.

Ricoh RDC-200G

Placeholder
11 years older

Significant advantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 4 cm vs 9 cm
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the RDC-200G and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Ricoh RDC-200G vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Ricoh RDC-4300

Ricoh RDC-4300
13 years older

Significant advantages of the RDC-4300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the RDC-4300 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much lower true resolution: 1.2 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the RDC-4300 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Ricoh RDC-4300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR