As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to waterproofs, ultra compacts, pro digicams, super zooms and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX20) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix x20 and the FinePix S2500HD)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7") and is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (98×66×22 mm)).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED) and has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 270 shots).

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$168

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×46×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120
2 years newer
$229

Significant advantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the AW120 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Compact (110×66×26 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AW120 and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus TG-630 iHS

Olympus TG-630 iHS
1 year newer
$787

Significant advantages of the TG-630 iHS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the TG-630 iHS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Shoots slower: 5 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the TG-630 iHS and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (98×66×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110
8 months newer
$445

Significant advantages of the S110 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S110 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Larger: Compact (99×59×27 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the S110 and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (98×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Kodak LS420

Placeholder
9 years older

Significant advantages of the LS420 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the LS420 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.6" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 320 x 240 @ 19fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the LS420 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to waterproof competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3") and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 1,229k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$677

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Ultra compact (96×59×15 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$440

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Ultra compact (96×56×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Have touch screens

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), is older (january 2012 vs january 2013) and is slightly heavier (157 g vs 116 g).

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$655

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
similar age
$199

Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (117×70×57 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 353 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20
1 year newer
$509

Significant advantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the x20 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the x20 and Z1000EXR

  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), has a touch screen, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 3.8").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 37.2x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
3 years newer
$189

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much longer battery life: 590 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the L840 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 538 g vs 157 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is significantly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (106×61×33 mm)), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 231 g).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 320 fps).

Olympus VH-520

Olympus VH-520
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the VH-520 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the VH-520 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (101×60×21 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F770 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the F770 EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (105×63×36 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F770 EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
4 months older
$329

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×22 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$399

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×61×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX260 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
1 year newer
$245

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Much larger: Compact (106×63×33 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the SX270 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
1 year newer
$309

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 220 fps vs None
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

common strengths of the ZS25 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (105×59×28 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS