As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, pro digicams, travel zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Samsung (such as the DV150F and the Galaxy Camera 2) and Fujifilm (such as the Finepix X10 and the FinePix JZ200)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 93x60x27 mm) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm), lacks a built in panoramas and has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 330 shots).

Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
1 year older
$147 - $560

Significant advantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots slower: 3.4 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the 500 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 500 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix AX650

Fujifilm FinePix AX650
1 year newer
$60 - $83

Significant advantages of the AX650 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Much longer battery life: 420 shots vs 220 shots
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the AX650 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 28 mm
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the AX650 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the AX650 vs the Z1000EXR

Pentax Optio LS465

Pentax Optio LS465
4 months newer
$100

Significant advantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the Optio LS465 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the Optio LS465 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 101x46x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Pentax Optio LS465 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot A3400 IS

Canon PowerShot A3400 IS
similar age
$89 - $119

Significant advantages of the A3400 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A3400 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the A3400 IS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 95x56x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A3400 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Have touch screens
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the Z1000EXR

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
5 months newer
$448 - $580

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 10.6 MP

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 101x58x35 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks a built in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos and slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 1 cm).

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$99 - $110

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung DV150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Casio Exilim EX-Z90

Casio Exilim EX-Z90
2 years older
$249

Significant advantages of the EX-Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z90 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the EX-Z90 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Casio Exilim EX-Z90 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Casio Exilim EX-Z33

Casio Exilim EX-Z33
2 years older
$130

Significant advantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the EX-Z33 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 848 x 480 vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the EX-Z33 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Casio Exilim EX-Z33 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Canon ELPH 530 HS
similar age
$175

Significant advantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 2.6 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 530 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
arrow Compare the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 392 g).

However, on average it has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps).

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10
4 months older
$339 - $568

Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Significantly larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm

Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Nikon Coolpix P7700

Nikon Coolpix P7700
7 months newer
$442

Significant advantages of the P7700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Shoots RAW
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the P7700 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly heavier: 392 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the P7700 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P7700 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 128x70x19 mm), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.1 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (0.7" vs 0.9").

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 18x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.0), doesn't have a built-in GPS and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
2 years newer
$359 - $449

Significant advantages of the Camera 2 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much larger screen: 4.8" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly more zoom: 21x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the Camera 2 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 133x71x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Much heavier: 283 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the Camera 2 and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 4.8" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung Galaxy Camera

Samsung Galaxy Camera
7 months newer
$70 - $359

Significant advantages of the Camera (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Much larger screen: 4.8" vs 3.5"
  • Significantly more zoom: 21x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the Camera (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly larger: Compact 128x70x19 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Much heavier: 300 g vs 157 g

common strengths of the Camera and Z1000EXR

  • Larger than average screens: 4.8" vs 3.5"
  • Have touch screens
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Samsung Galaxy Camera vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200

Fujifilm FinePix JZ200
similar age
$86

Significant advantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the JZ200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the JZ200 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the JZ200 vs the Z1000EXR

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS
1 year newer
$225

Significant advantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 255 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the IXUS 255 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Super compact 97x56x23 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Canon IXUS 255 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F
similar age
$160

Significant advantages of the WB150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly more zoom: 18x vs 5x
  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the WB150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the WB150F and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact 106x59x23 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
arrow Compare the Samsung WB150F vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Fujifilm FinePix T400

Fujifilm FinePix T400
similar age
$62 - $89

Significant advantages of the T400 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the T400 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact 104x59x29 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm

common strengths of the T400 and Z1000EXR

  • Light weight: 159 g vs 157 g
arrow Compare the T400 vs the Z1000EXR

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 38 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.8"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 110k dots), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 144x88x72 mm) and has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.4), slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 4 cm), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and doesn't support an external flash.

Ricoh RDC-200G

Placeholder
11 years older

Significant advantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 4 cm vs 9 cm
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the RDC-200G (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 3.5"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the RDC-200G and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Ricoh RDC-200G vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Pentax EI-200

Placeholder
12 years older

Significant advantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much lower true resolution: 1.9 MP vs 10.6 MP

common strengths of the EI-200 and Z1000EXR

  • None found
arrow Compare the Pentax EI-200 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR