As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to ultra compacts, travel zooms, super zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot A4000 IS and the PowerShot ELPH 530 HS) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix FH10 and the Lumix DMC-XS1)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 3"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs compact (101×55×25 mm)), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 3.4 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks a built-in HDR feature and lacks built-in panoramas.

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
2 years older
$245

Significant advantages of the F200EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the F200EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the F200EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (98×59×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix XP10

Fujifilm FinePix XP10
1 year older
$179

Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the XP10 and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Compact (96×64×23 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
  • Light weight: 135 g vs 157 g

Canon ELPH 500 HS

Canon ELPH 500 HS
1 year older
$130

Significant advantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 500 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots much slower: 3.4 fps vs 12 fps
  • Smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Thicker: 1" vs 0.7"

common strengths of the 500 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Compact (101×55×25 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS
similar age
$250

Significant advantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 110 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 110 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Fairly small: Super compact (93×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$300

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5"
  • Fairly small: Super compact (101×59×18 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)

Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310
similar age
$404

Significant advantages of the P310 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the P310 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly larger: Compact (103×58×32 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the P310 and Z1000EXR

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 2.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS

Canon ELPH 530 HS
similar age
$178

Significant advantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 530 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Shoots much slower: 2.6 fps vs 12 fps
  • Smaller screen: 3.2" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ELPH 530 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3.2" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS

Canon ELPH 520 HS
similar age
$110

Significant advantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 520 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Shoots much slower: 2.8 fps vs 12 fps

common strengths of the ELPH 520 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Panasonic Lumix FH10

Panasonic Lumix FH10
1 year newer
$88

Significant advantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the FH10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the FH10 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$127

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
similar age
$273

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5"
  • Very good image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$200

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the DV150F and Z1000EXR

  • Built-in flashes
  • Good image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 25fps), has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 0.8 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), doesn't have a built-in GPS, doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

Canon PowerShot A4000 IS
similar age
$143

Significant advantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the A4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the A4000 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
4 months older
$295

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the 310 HS and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS
2 years newer
$150

Significant advantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 140 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the ELPH 140 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
1 year newer
$405

Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Has a GPS
  • Better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR

  • Have touch screens
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Nikon Coolpix S6500

Nikon Coolpix S6500
1 year newer
$80 - $154

Significant advantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S6500 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"

common strengths of the S6500 and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
7 months newer
$175

Significant advantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Significantly longer battery life: 380 shots vs 220 shots
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX160 IS (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the SX160 IS and Z1000EXR

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), is much smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs large (131×91×126 mm)), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 1.3 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 480 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR
1 year newer
$225

Significant advantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the HS35EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (131×97×126 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS35EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR
1 year newer
$303 - $311

Significant advantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the HS50EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (135×101×146 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS50EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd
4 years older

Significant advantages of the S1000fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the S1000fd (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the S1000fd and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Standard size (103×73×68 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 2.7" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W

Fujifilm FinePix S9400W
2 years newer
$160 - $280

Significant advantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly more zoom: 50x vs 5x
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S9400W (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Professional size (123×87×116 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the S9400W and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD

Fujifilm FinePix S2500HD
1 year older
$185

Significant advantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the S2500HD (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the S2500HD and Z1000EXR

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Light weight: 337 g vs 157 g
  • Thin: 3.2" vs 0.7"

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10
1 year older
$400

Significant advantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the HS10 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much larger: Large (131×91×126 mm) vs Super compact (102×60×18 mm)
  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the HS10 and Z1000EXR

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 12 fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2"), is slightly smaller (super compact (102×60×18 mm) vs standard size (128×72×57 mm)), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes significantly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 1.9 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.4), lacks built-in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 300 shots) and slightly worse macro focusing (9.0 cm vs 5.0 cm).

Pentax EI-200

Placeholder
12 years older

Significant advantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.4 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the EI-200 (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3.5"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 34 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the EI-200 and Z1000EXR

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR
6 months newer
$196

Significant advantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 3" vs 3.5"
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the F800EXR and Z1000EXR

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 208 g vs 157 g