Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR Competitors

As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR is also often compared to pro digicams, travel zooms, ultra compacts, super zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR's top rivals come from Canon (such as the PowerShot SD4000 IS and the Powershot N Facebook ready) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S6800 and the Coolpix S6600)

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 230k dots), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 8.1 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), lacks a built in panoramas, slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm) and is not waterproof.

Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS 1 year older	Significant advantages of the SD4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the SD4000 IS (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the SD4000 IS and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 100x54x23 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 1 year older $240	Significant advantages of the DSC-T99 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm Significantly longer exposures: 30 seconds vs 4 seconds Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T99 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Significantly larger: Compact 102x58x29 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the DSC-T99 and Z1000EXR Have touch screens
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP 2 years older	Significant advantages of the Z33WP (vs the Z1000EXR) Waterproof Lighter: 110 g vs 157 g Significant disadvantages of the Z33WP (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the Z33WP and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 92x60x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Z33WP vs the Z1000EXR
Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR 9 months older $193	Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None Can create panoramas in-camera Has in-camera HDR Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the Z900EXR and Z1000EXR Very large screens: 3.5" vs 3.5" Fairly small: Super compact 101x59x18 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens
	Compare the Finepix Z900EXR vs the FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix XP20 similar age $121	Significant advantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Can create panoramas in-camera Waterproof Significant disadvantages of the XP20 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the XP20 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the XP20 vs the Z1000EXR
Canon PowerShot A2500 1 year newer $79 - $126	Significant advantages of the A2500 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9 Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the A2500 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the A2500 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Super compact 98x56x21 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Thin: 0.8" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Canon PowerShot A2500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs standard size 117x70x57 mm), has a touch screen, is thinner (0.7" vs 2.2") and is slightly lighter (157 g vs 399 g).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller sensor (1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm), doesn't shoot RAW, has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), has a slightly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 200 fps).

Nikon Coolpix P7800 1 year newer $468 - $547	Significant advantages of the P7800 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Shoots RAW Larger sensor: 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Significant disadvantages of the P7800 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly heavier: 399 g vs 157 g common strengths of the P7800 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix P7800 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm Finepix X10 4 months older $324 - $425	Significant advantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9 Shoots RAW Much larger sensor: 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm vs 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm Significant disadvantages of the X10 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5" No touch screen Thicker: 2.2" vs 0.7" common strengths of the X10 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Finepix X10 vs the FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.8"), is slightly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs compact 105x59x28 mm), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 6 fps).

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Nikon Coolpix S6800 2 years newer $195 - $220	Significant advantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR) Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the S6800 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the S6800 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 96x57x22 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Thin: 0.9" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6800 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Canon Powershot N Facebook ready 1 year newer	Significant advantages of the N Facebook ready (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Supports 24p Has a flip-out screen Significant disadvantages of the N Facebook ready (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.8" vs 3.5" Shoots significantly slower: 2.3 fps vs 12 fps Lower true resolution: 9 MP vs 10.6 MP common strengths of the N Facebook ready and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 79x60x29 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Have touch screens Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Canon Powershot N Facebook ready vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix S6600 1 year newer $194	Significant advantages of the S6600 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a flip-out screen Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9 Much better macro capability: 2 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the S6600 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7" common strengths of the S6600 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 96x57x27 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6600 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Panasonic Lumix ZS30 1 year newer $329 - $399	Significant advantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a GPS Much more zoom: 20x vs 5x Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm Significant disadvantages of the ZS30 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Significantly larger: Compact 105x59x28 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Significantly thicker: 1.1" vs 0.7" common strengths of the ZS30 and Z1000EXR Have touch screens Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix S6300 similar age $134	Significant advantages of the S6300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9 Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significant disadvantages of the S6300 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly thicker: 1" vs 0.7" common strengths of the S6300 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Compact 94x58x26 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Light weight: 160 g vs 157 g
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Nikon Coolpix S9500 1 year newer $175	Significant advantages of the S9500 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much more zoom: 22x vs 5x Has a GPS Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD Significant disadvantages of the S9500 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Much larger: Compact 110x60x31 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm No touch screen common strengths of the S9500 and Z1000EXR Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix S9500 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 2.7"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.6), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), lacks a built in HDR feature, lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't take 3D photos.

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 similar age $199	Significant advantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 460k dots Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX66 (vs the Z1000EXR) None found common strengths of the DSC-TX66 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Very large screens: 3.3" vs 3.5" Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift
	Compare the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Sony Cyber-shot WX50 similar age $159	Significant advantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9 Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO Takes 3D photos Significant disadvantages of the WX50 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the WX50 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Good image stabilization: Lens vs Sensor shift Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR
Fujifilm FinePix Z20fd 4 years older $255	Significant advantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR) None found Significant disadvantages of the Z20fd (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3.5" Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps common strengths of the Z20fd and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Z20fd vs the Z1000EXR
Samsung ST72 1 year newer $110 - $147	Significant advantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much wider aperture: f/2.5 vs f/3.9 Can create panoramas in-camera Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the ST72 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps No touch screen common strengths of the ST72 and Z1000EXR Each has a built-in flash Larger than average screens: 3.0" vs 3.5" Thin: 0.7" vs 0.7"
	Compare the Samsung ST72 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 3.0"), is significantly smaller (super compact 102x60x18 mm vs prosumer size 111x76x85 mm), takes slightly higher resolution photos (10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (12 fps vs 8 fps).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.0), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 29.3x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has a significantly lower resolution screen (460k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L820 1 year newer $180 - $279	Significant advantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR) Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9 Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 460k dots More zoom: 29.3x vs 5x Significant disadvantages of the L820 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen Significantly larger: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm common strengths of the L820 and Z1000EXR Fairly small: Prosumer size 111x76x85 mm vs Super compact 102x60x18 mm Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS Light weight: 470 g vs 157 g
	Compare the Nikon Coolpix L820 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 37 mm), has a much larger screen (3.5" vs 1.5"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (460k dots vs 61k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it lacks a built in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos, has a slightly shorter battery life (220 shots vs 300 shots), doesn't shoot RAW and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR 6 months newer $263	Significant advantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Takes 3D photos Can create panoramas in-camera Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm Significant disadvantages of the F800EXR (vs the Z1000EXR) Much smaller screen: 3.0" vs 3.5" No touch screen common strengths of the F800EXR and Z1000EXR Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
	Compare the F800EXR vs the Z1000EXR
Kodak EasyShare CX7220 8 years older	Significant advantages of the CX7220 (vs the Z1000EXR) Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None Significant disadvantages of the CX7220 (vs the Z1000EXR) Much worse macro capability: 60 cm vs 9 cm Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 3.5" Significantly worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 28 mm common strengths of the CX7220 and Z1000EXR None found
	Compare the Kodak EasyShare CX7220 vs the Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR