As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm XP90 is also often compared to boutiques, ultra compacts, digicams and travel zooms. The Fujifilm XP90's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP120 and the XP80) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix W100 and the Coolpix S33)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in flash, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots) and has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 5 mm), is slightly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs super compact (104×58×20 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Canon PowerShot D30

Canon PowerShot D30
1 year older
$245 - $300

Significant advantages of the D30 (vs the XP90)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the D30 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 920k dots
  • Shoots significantly slower: 1.9 fps vs 10 fps
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the D30 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
1 year older
$167

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP90)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 100 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the XP80 and XP90

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30
1 year older
$136 - $168

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (104×58×20 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the DMC-TS30 and XP90

  • None found

Olympus Tough TG-4

Olympus Tough TG-4
9 months older
$380

Significant advantages of the TG-4 (vs the XP90)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much longer battery life: 380 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the TG-4 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the TG-4 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Popularity: 203 vs 249

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
1 year older
$125

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the S33 and XP90

  • None found

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition
2 years older
$472

Significant advantages of the Silver Edition (vs the XP90)

  • Much better wide angle: 5 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Much smaller: Ultra compact (60×42×30 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Silver Edition (vs the XP90)

  • No built-in flash
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Silver Edition and XP90

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, is newer (january 2016 vs june 2012), is slightly less expensive ($159.00 vs $380.39) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), is slightly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs super compact (126×64×15 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20 MP) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
1 year newer
$159 - $229

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP90)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 100 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP90)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 10 fps

Casio Exilim EX-TR50

Casio Exilim EX-TR50
1 year older
$400

Significant advantages of the EX-TR50 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much smaller: Super compact (126×64×15 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the EX-TR50 (vs the XP90)

  • No built-in flash
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the EX-TR50 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 920k dots
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
3 years older

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly longer battery life: 300 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Shoots slower: 3 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the XP170 and XP90

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
3 years older
$380 - $448

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the XP90)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher true resolution: 20 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Much larger sensor: 1" 13.2x8.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly thicker: 1.4" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and XP90

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • High resolution screens: 1,229k dots vs 920k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to boutique competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs standard size (127×74×54 mm)), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 6 fps), is newer (january 2016 vs january 2013) and is thinner (1.1" vs 2.1").

However, on average it has a much narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2), doesn't record movies in 24p, has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.6x15.8mm), has a significantly shorter battery life (210 shots vs 330 shots) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs optical).

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Fujifilm FinePix X100T
1 year older
$990 - $1,099

Significant advantages of the X100T (vs the XP90)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly longer battery life: 330 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the X100T (vs the XP90)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Shoots significantly slower: 6 fps vs 10 fps
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the X100T and XP90

  • Fairly small: Standard size (127×74×52 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 440 g vs 203 g
  • Thin: 2.1" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix X100s

Fujifilm FinePix X100s
3 years older
$826

Significant advantages of the X100s (vs the XP90)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly longer battery life: 330 shots vs 210 shots
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the X100s (vs the XP90)

  • Shoots significantly slower: 6 fps vs 10 fps
  • Not waterproof
  • Significantly heavier: 445 g vs 203 g

common strengths of the X100s and XP90

  • Fairly small: Standard size (127×74×54 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 445 g vs 203 g
  • Thin: 2.1" vs 1.1"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.5"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), is much larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs ultra compact (50×22×54 mm)), doesn't have a touch screen and is significantly heavier (203 g vs 100 g).

Nikon Coolpix S02

Nikon Coolpix S02
2 years older
$154

Significant advantages of the S02 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S02 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the S02 and XP90

  • None found

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800
1 year older
$90 - $107

Significant advantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W800 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W800 and XP90

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital), is newer (january 2016 vs january 2015) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs UHD @ 30fps), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
6 months newer
$157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and XP90

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 203 g
  • Inexpensive: $156.95 vs $159.00

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS
1 year older
$259

Significant advantages of the SX710 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX710 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SX710 HS and XP90

  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.1"

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera
3 years older
$88 - $99

Significant advantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the XP90)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Instant Digital Camera and XP90

  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.1"
  • Inexpensive: $88.00 vs $159.00

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)
similar age

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the XP90)

  • Higher resolution movies: UHD @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) (vs the XP90)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80) and XP90

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 1.1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), is significantly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs compact (95×57×24 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Samsung WB50F

Samsung WB50F
2 years older
$329

Significant advantages of the WB50F (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the WB50F (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the WB50F and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix A300

Nikon Coolpix A300
3 months newer
$137

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller: Super compact (96×58×20 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the Coolpix A300 and XP90

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000
1 year older
$270

Significant advantages of the S7000 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (99×60×27 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the S7000 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the S7000 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS
similar age
$120 - $150

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS and XP90

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"