As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm XP90 is also often compared to digicams, travel zooms and super zooms. The Fujifilm XP90's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP120 and the XP80) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix W100 and the AW130)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 460k dots), is newer (january 2016 vs september 2013) and is slightly less expensive ($104.99 vs $372.16).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 5 mm), is slightly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs super compact (104×58×20 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 12,800 ISO).

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870
similar age

Significant advantages of the Stylus Tough TG-870 (vs the XP90)

  • Much better wide angle: 21 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 100 ISO
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus Tough TG-870 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the Stylus Tough TG-870 and XP90

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 920k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Announced: January 2016 vs January 2016

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
1 year older
$129

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP90)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 100 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the XP80 and XP90

  • Inexpensive: $129.00 vs $104.99

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition
2 years older
$480

Significant advantages of the Silver Edition (vs the XP90)

  • Much better wide angle: 5 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Much smaller: Ultra compact (60×42×30 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Silver Edition (vs the XP90)

  • No built-in flash
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Silver Edition and XP90

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30
1 year older
$133 - $168

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (104×58×20 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the DMC-TS30 and XP90

  • Inexpensive: $133.16 vs $104.99

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860
1 year older
$372

Significant advantages of the TG-860 (vs the XP90)

  • Much better wide angle: 21 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the TG-860 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the TG-860 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130
1 year older
$261 - $347

Significant advantages of the AW130 (vs the XP90)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the AW130 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the AW130 and XP90

  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 920k dots
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 3.4 fps), is newer (january 2016 vs may 2012) and is slightly less expensive ($104.99 vs $318.99).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), is slightly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs super compact (92×56×20 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
1 year newer
$199 - $200

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP90)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 100 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP90)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 10 fps

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
3 years older

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly longer battery life: 300 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Shoots slower: 3 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the XP170 and XP90

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
5 years older
$319

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much smaller: Super compact (92×56×20 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 300 HS and XP90

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 37 mm), has a much larger screen (3" vs 1.6"), has a much higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 61k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.7 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second).

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
6 months newer
$157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and XP90

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 203 g
  • Inexpensive: $156.95 vs $104.99

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera

Polaroid Z2300 Instant Digital Camera
3 years older
$87 - $99

Significant advantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Instant Digital Camera (vs the XP90)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Instant Digital Camera and XP90

  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.1"
  • Inexpensive: $87.02 vs $104.99

Kodak EasyShare CX7300

Placeholder
12 years older
$199

Significant advantages of the CX7300 (vs the XP90)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None
  • Significantly faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the CX7300 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.6" vs 3"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the CX7300 and XP90

  • Light weight: 162 g vs 203 g
  • Inexpensive: $199.00 vs $104.99

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 2.5 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), is significantly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs compact (100×58×23 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
2 years older
$118 - $130

Significant advantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller: Super compact (93×52×23 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much lower resolution screen: 115k dots vs 920k dots
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"

common strengths of the DSC-W830 and XP90

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix A300

Nikon Coolpix A300
3 months newer
$137

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller: Super compact (96×58×20 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the Coolpix A300 and XP90

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS
similar age
$149

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS and XP90

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
similar age
$199

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (100×58×23 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 920k dots
  • Shoots slower: 2.5 fps vs 10 fps
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000
1 year older
$230

Significant advantages of the S7000 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (99×60×27 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the S7000 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the S7000 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Samsung WB50F

Samsung WB50F
2 years older
$329

Significant advantages of the WB50F (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the WB50F (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the WB50F and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), is slightly smaller (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs prosumer size (114×78×95 mm)), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is newer (january 2016 vs february 2015) and is thinner (1.1" vs 3.7").

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 40x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500
similar age
$215 - $257

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the XP90)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly more zoom: 39.1x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B500 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×78×95 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 3.7" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Coolpix B500 and XP90

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×78×95 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Inexpensive: $214.99 vs $104.99

Canon PowerShot SX420 IS

Canon PowerShot SX420 IS
similar age
$229

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX420 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly more zoom: 42x vs 5x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX420 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the PowerShot SX420 IS and XP90

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 203 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
1 year older
$170

Significant advantages of the SX410 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly more zoom: 40x vs 5x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX410 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SX410 IS and XP90

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 203 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840
1 year older
$179 - $199

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the XP90)

  • Much better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Much longer battery life: 590 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Significantly thicker: 3.8" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the L840 and XP90

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 538 g vs 203 g
  • Inexpensive: $179.00 vs $104.99