As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm XP90 is also often compared to digicams and travel zooms. The Fujifilm XP90's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP120 and the XP80) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix W100 and the Coolpix A100)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a significantly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is newer (january 2016 vs september 2013).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 8 mm), is significantly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs super compact (104×58×20 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
1 year older
$145

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP80 and XP90

  • None found

Olympus Tough TG-850 iHS

Olympus Tough TG-850 iHS
1 year older
$343

Significant advantages of the TG-850 iHS (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TG-850 iHS (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-850 iHS and XP90

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30
1 year older
$120 - $148

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-TS30 and XP90

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years older
$199

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP70 and XP90

  • None found

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition
2 years older
$493

Significant advantages of the Silver Edition (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Silver Edition (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the Silver Edition and XP90

  • None found

GoPro HD Hero 2

GoPro HD Hero 2
4 years older
$252

Significant advantages of the HD Hero 2 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the HD Hero 2 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the HD Hero 2 and XP90

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 3 fps) and is newer (january 2016 vs may 2012).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), is slightly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs super compact (95×59×20 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 120 fps) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
1 year newer
$149 - $150

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP90)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 100 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP90)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • High resolution screens: 920k dots vs 920k dots
  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 10 fps

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100
similar age
$114

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly lighter: 119 g vs 203 g

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the Coolpix A100 and XP90

  • Inexpensive: $114.14 vs $149.95

Nikon Coolpix P300

Nikon Coolpix P300
5 years older
$380

Significant advantages of the P300 (vs the XP90)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Records high-speed movies: 120 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the P300 (vs the XP90)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the P300 and XP90

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • High resolution screens: 921k dots vs 920k dots

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
3 years older

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly longer battery life: 300 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Shoots slower: 3 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the XP170 and XP90

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 30 mm), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a much higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.7 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), is older (january 2016 vs august 2016) and is less popular.

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
6 months newer
$119 - $157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and XP90

  • Fairly small: Mid size (110×67×38 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 177 g vs 203 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.1"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 2.5 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2016 vs february 2014).

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), is significantly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs compact (96×55×26 mm)) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
1 year older
$268 - $347

Significant advantages of the DSC-WX350 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (96×55×26 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-WX350 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Not waterproof
  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-WX350 and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS
similar age
$139

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS and XP90

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
similar age
$179

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (100×58×23 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 920k dots
  • Shoots slower: 2.5 fps vs 10 fps
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Samsung WB50F

Samsung WB50F
2 years older
$299

Significant advantages of the WB50F (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the WB50F (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Lower resolution screen: 460k dots vs 920k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the WB50F and XP90

  • Larger than average screens: 3" vs 3"
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"