As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm XP90 is also often compared to digicams, super zooms and travel zooms. The Fujifilm XP90's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP120 and the XP80) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix W100 and the AW130)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 460k dots), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2016 vs january 2012).

However, on average it has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), is slightly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs super compact (104×58×20 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Fujifilm XP80

Placeholder
1 year older

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP80 and XP90

  • None found

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Placeholder
similar age

Significant advantages of the Stylus Tough TG-870 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus Tough TG-870 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the Stylus Tough TG-870 and XP90

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Placeholder
1 year older
$148

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS30 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-TS30 and XP90

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix TS20

Placeholder
4 years older

Significant advantages of the TS20 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TS20 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the TS20 and XP90

  • None found

Nikon AW130

Placeholder
1 year older
$512

Significant advantages of the AW130 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the AW130 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the AW130 and XP90

  • None found

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860

Placeholder
1 year older
$798

Significant advantages of the TG-860 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TG-860 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-860 and XP90

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital) and shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 3 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), is slightly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs compact (96×59×29 mm)), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and has a slightly shorter battery life (210 shots vs 240 shots).

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Placeholder
1 year newer
$199

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP90)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 100 ISO

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP90)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP90

  • Inexpensive: $199.00 vs $213.73

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Placeholder
3 years older

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP90)

  • Much longer battery life: 300 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the XP170 and XP90

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps

Canon PowerShot SD700 IS

Placeholder
10 years older

Significant advantages of the SD700 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (90×57×26 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the SD700 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller screen: 2.5" vs 3"
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps

common strengths of the SD700 IS and XP90

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix A10

Placeholder
similar age
$87

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XP90)

  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm
  • Smaller: Compact (96×59×29 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the Coolpix A10 and XP90

  • Inexpensive: $86.95 vs $213.73

Nikon Coolpix A100

Placeholder
similar age
$135 - $174

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly longer battery life: 250 shots vs 210 shots

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the Coolpix A100 and XP90

  • Inexpensive: $134.58 vs $213.73

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 30 mm), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a much higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 230k dots), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.7 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3) and is older (january 2016 vs august 2016).

Nikon Coolpix W100

Placeholder
6 months newer
$157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP90)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and XP90

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 203 g
  • Inexpensive: $156.95 vs $213.73

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to super zoom competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 461k dots), is slightly smaller (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs prosumer size (114×89×96 mm)), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 3.8 fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is newer (january 2016 vs august 2013).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 37.2x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 23 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Nikon Coolpix L840

Placeholder
1 year older
$413

Significant advantages of the L840 (vs the XP90)

  • Much longer battery life: 590 shots vs 210 shots
  • Wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 23 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the L840 (vs the XP90)

  • Larger: Prosumer size (114×89×96 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Not waterproof
  • Significantly thicker: 3.8" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the L840 and XP90

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX420 IS

Placeholder
similar age
$229

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX420 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly more zoom: 42x vs 5x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX420 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Shoots slower: 0.5 fps vs 10 fps

common strengths of the PowerShot SX420 IS and XP90

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×69×85 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 203 g
  • Thin: 3.3" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Placeholder
2 years older

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 461k dots vs 920k dots
  • Not waterproof
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the SX510 HS and XP90

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×70×80 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 349 g vs 203 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.1"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP90 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 60fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a much larger screen (3" vs 2.7"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (920k dots vs 115k dots), shoots faster continuously (10 fps vs 1.1 fps) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), is significantly larger (compact (110×71×28 mm) vs super compact (96×58×20 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (100 ISO vs 3,200 ISO).

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Placeholder
similar age
$149

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (95×57×24 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 190 IS and XP90

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix JZ700

Placeholder
2 years older

Significant advantages of the JZ700 (vs the XP90)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (99×57×23 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the JZ700 (vs the XP90)

  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the JZ700 and XP90

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Placeholder
2 years older
$118

Significant advantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller: Super compact (93×52×23 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Much lower resolution screen: 115k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the DSC-W830 and XP90

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix A300

Placeholder
3 months newer
$137

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP90)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much smaller: Super compact (96×58×20 mm) vs Compact (110×71×28 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP90)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2.7" vs 3"
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 920k dots

common strengths of the Coolpix A300 and XP90

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"