As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 is also often compared to travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP50's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP120 and the FinePix XP60) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S32)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP50 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (0.8 fps vs 4.7 fps), is older (january 2012 vs january 2013) and doesn't have a built-in GPS.

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP60 and XP50

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S32

Nikon Coolpix S32
2 years newer
$180

Significant advantages of the S32 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S32 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the S32 and XP50

  • None found

Olympus Tough TG-810

Olympus Tough TG-810
10 months older

Significant advantages of the TG-810 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TG-810 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-810 and XP50

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Fujifilm FinePix XP30
10 months older

Significant advantages of the XP30 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP30 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP30 and XP50

  • None found

Olympus Tough TG-320

Olympus TG-320
similar age

Significant advantages of the TG-320 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TG-320 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-320 and XP50

  • None found

Olympus TG-620

Olympus TG-620
similar age
$349

Significant advantages of the TG-620 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TG-620 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-620 and XP50

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP50 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 37 mm), has a significantly larger screen (2.7" vs 2"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 4.9 MP) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (0.8 fps vs 10 fps) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
5 years newer
$94 - $114

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP50)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 0.8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP50)

  • Much larger: Compact (110×71×28 mm) vs Compact (99×68×26 mm)
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP50

  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1"
  • Light weight: 203 g vs 175 g

Konica Minolta DiMAGE X50

Konica Minolta DiMAGE X50
7 years older

Significant advantages of the X50 (vs the XP50)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (84×62×24 mm) vs Compact (99×68×26 mm)
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the X50 (vs the XP50)

  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 2.7"
  • Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the X50 and XP50

  • Very small: Super compact (84×62×24 mm) vs Compact (99×68×26 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1"
  • Very light: 155 g vs 175 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP50 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact (99×68×26 mm) vs compact (104×59×33 mm)), is thinner (1" vs 1.3"), is slightly lighter (175 g vs 217 g) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (0.8 fps vs 11 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the XP50)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much longer battery life: 300 shots vs 220 shots

Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the XP50)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (104×59×33 mm) vs Compact (99×68×26 mm)
  • Not waterproof
  • Significantly thicker: 1.3" vs 1"

common strengths of the F665 EXR and XP50

  • Very small: Compact (104×59×33 mm) vs Compact (99×68×26 mm)
  • Very light: 217 g vs 175 g
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 1"