As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 is also often compared to travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP50's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP120 and the FinePix XP60) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S32 and the Coolpix W100)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP50 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), is older (january 2012 vs january 2013) and doesn't have a built-in GPS.

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP60 and XP50

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S32

Nikon Coolpix S32
2 years newer
$180

Significant advantages of the S32 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S32 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the S32 and XP50

  • None found

Olympus Tough TG-810

Olympus Tough TG-810
10 months older

Significant advantages of the TG-810 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TG-810 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-810 and XP50

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Fujifilm FinePix XP30
10 months older

Significant advantages of the XP30 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP30 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP30 and XP50

  • None found

Olympus Tough TG-320

Olympus TG-320
similar age

Significant advantages of the TG-320 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TG-320 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-320 and XP50

  • None found

Olympus TG-620

Olympus TG-620
similar age
$349

Significant advantages of the TG-620 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TG-620 (vs the XP50)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-620 and XP50

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP50 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 37 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is thinner (1" vs 1.4").

However, on average it has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (0.8 fps vs 10 fps) and is older (january 2012 vs january 2017).

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
5 years newer
$94 - $114

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP50)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 0.8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP50)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP50

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1"

Konica Minolta DiMAGE X50

Konica Minolta DiMAGE X50
7 years older

Significant advantages of the X50 (vs the XP50)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the X50 (vs the XP50)

  • Much worse wide angle: 37 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the X50 and XP50

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1"
  • Light weight: 155 g vs 175 g

Fujifilm FinePix XP130

Placeholder
6 years newer
$130 - $162

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP130 (vs the XP50)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 0.8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP130 (vs the XP50)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP130 and XP50

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1"

GoPro Hero (2018)

Placeholder
6 years newer
$259

Significant advantages of the Hero (2018) (vs the XP50)

  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (65×45×35 mm) vs Compact (99×68×26 mm)
  • Has a touch screen
  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 0.8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Hero (2018) (vs the XP50)

  • No built-in flash
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2" vs 2.7"
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Hero (2018) and XP50

  • Light weight: 117 g vs 175 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP50 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.4), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR
similar age

Significant advantages of the F665 EXR (vs the XP50)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots
  • Shoots significantly faster: 11 fps vs 0.8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the F665 EXR (vs the XP50)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the F665 EXR and XP50

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix A1000

Placeholder
7 years newer
$477

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the XP50)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Wider aperture: f/3.4 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the XP50)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Coolpix A1000 and XP50

  • None found