As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP22 is also often compared to super zooms, travel zooms, ultra compacts, digicams and mirrorless. The Fujifilm FinePix XP22's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix B600 and the Coolpix W100) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) and the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP22 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 30 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (0.8 fps vs 4.7 fps), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), has a slightly shorter battery life (200 shots vs 250 shots) and is older (january 2012 vs january 2014).

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$179

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP70 and XP22

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
4 months older

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

common strengths of the AW100 and XP22

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
3 years newer
$150

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

common strengths of the S33 and XP22

  • None found

Olympus TG-620

Olympus TG-620
similar age
$349

Significant advantages of the TG-620 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the TG-620 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-620 and XP22

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP11

Fujifilm FinePix XP11
1 year older

Significant advantages of the XP11 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP11 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP11 and XP22

  • None found

Olympus mju Tough 3000

Olympus mju Tough 3000
2 years older

Significant advantages of the Tough 3000 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Tough 3000 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

common strengths of the Tough 3000 and XP22

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP22 compared to other compact competitors include: it is much smaller (compact (99×68×24 mm) vs compact (110×71×28 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.3"), is significantly lighter (162 g vs 240 g), has a built-in GPS and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.6), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (0.8 fps vs 20 fps) and has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS).

Casio QV-R4

Placeholder
9 years older

Significant advantages of the QV-R4 (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.6 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the QV-R4 (vs the XP22)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.6" vs 2.7"
  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the QV-R4 and XP22

  • Very small: Compact (90×59×31 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
5 years newer
$94 - $114

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP22)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger: Compact (110×71×28 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP22

  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 203 g vs 162 g

Olympus Tough TG-5

Placeholder
5 years newer
$399

Significant advantages of the Tough TG-5 (vs the XP22)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the Tough TG-5 (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger: Compact (113×66×32 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much heavier: 250 g vs 162 g

common strengths of the Tough TG-5 and XP22

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP130

Placeholder
6 years newer
$130 - $162

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP130 (vs the XP22)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP130 (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger: Compact (110×71×28 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP130 and XP22

  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 207 g vs 162 g

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA

Placeholder
6 years newer
$998

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the XP22)

  • Much wider aperture: f/1.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,228k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger: Compact (102×58×41 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much heavier: 299 g vs 162 g

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA and XP22

  • None found

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
5 years newer
$369 - $429

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the XP22)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2 vs f/3.9
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly larger: Compact (98×58×31 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and XP22

  • Very small: Compact (98×58×31 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 206 g vs 162 g

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP22 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact (99×68×24 mm) vs 146×119×181 mm), is thinner (0.9" vs 7.1"), is significantly lighter (162 g vs 1,415 g), has a built-in GPS and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 125x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 21 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots).

Nikon Coolpix B600

Placeholder
7 years newer
$327

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B600 (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B600 (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Larger: Prosumer size (122×82×99 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Coolpix B600 and XP22

  • Fairly small: Prosumer size (122×82×99 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Light weight: 500 g vs 162 g
  • Thin: 3.9" vs 0.9"

Canon PowerShot SX30 IS

Canon PowerShot SX30 IS
1 year older
$582

Significant advantages of the SX30 IS (vs the XP22)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the SX30 IS (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly larger: Professional size (123×92×108 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SX30 IS and XP22

  • Fairly small: Professional size (123×92×108 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Light weight: 601 g vs 162 g
  • Thin: 4.3" vs 0.9"

Canon PowerShot SX70 HS

Placeholder
6 years newer
$478 - $549

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX70 HS (vs the XP22)

  • Much better wide angle: 21 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX70 HS (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly larger: Large (127×91×117 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 4.6" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the PowerShot SX70 HS and XP22

  • Fairly small: Large (127×91×117 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Light weight: 608 g vs 162 g

Nikon Coolpix P1000

Placeholder
6 years newer
$849 - $997

Significant advantages of the Coolpix P1000 (vs the XP22)

  • Much more zoom: 125x vs 5x
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.7"
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix P1000 (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger: 146×119×181 mm vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much heavier: 1,415 g vs 162 g

common strengths of the Coolpix P1000 and XP22

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
3 years newer
$382 - $398

Significant advantages of the DMC-FZ300 (vs the XP22)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FZ300 (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly larger: Large (132×92×117 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 4.6" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the DMC-FZ300 and XP22

  • Light weight: 691 g vs 162 g

Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700
4 years newer
$339 - $459

Significant advantages of the Coolpix B700 (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix B700 (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (125×85×107 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Coolpix B700 and XP22

  • Fairly small: Professional size (125×85×107 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Light weight: 565 g vs 162 g
  • Thin: 4.2" vs 0.9"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP22 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.4), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Placeholder
6 years newer
$338 - $399

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 922k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the PowerShot SX740 HS and XP22

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

Placeholder
7 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) and XP22

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S3700

Nikon Coolpix S3700
3 years newer
$200

Significant advantages of the S3700 (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S3700 (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the S3700 and XP22

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix A1000

Placeholder
7 years newer
$477

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A1000 (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Coolpix A1000 and XP22

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Placeholder
6 years newer
$448

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 and XP22

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90)

Placeholder
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90) (vs the XP22)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90) (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS70 (Lumix DC-TZ90) and XP22

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP22 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a much wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), is newer (january 2012 vs february 2009), has a built-in GPS, is waterproof and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1000 of a second).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.5"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), is much larger (compact (99×68×24 mm) vs ultra compact (98×58×16 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and is thicker (0.9" vs 0.6").

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
2 years older

Significant advantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-T900 (vs the XP22)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-T900 and XP22

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP22 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, is waterproof and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1300 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (0.8 fps vs 10 fps) and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

Placeholder
6 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) (vs the XP22)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1300 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7) and XP22

  • Thin: 1.5" vs 0.9"

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
4 years newer
$99 - $157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP22)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and XP22

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 162 g

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP22 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is much smaller (compact (99×68×24 mm) vs large (144×147×75 mm)), has a built-in GPS, is thinner (0.9" vs 3"), is much lighter (162 g vs 997 g) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 51,200 ISO) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Olympus OM-D E-M1X

Placeholder
7 years newer
$2,999 (body only)
$3,798 12-40mm lens

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,037k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger: Large (144×147×75 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the OM-D E-M1X and XP22

  • None found

Fujifilm X-T30

Placeholder
7 years newer
$899 (body only)
$999 - $1,039 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T30 (vs the XP22)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the X-T30 (vs the XP22)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof
  • Significantly thicker: 1.9" vs 0.9"

common strengths of the X-T30 and XP22

  • Fairly small: Standard size (118×83×47 mm) vs Compact (99×68×24 mm)
  • Thin: 1.9" vs 0.9"
  • Light weight: 383 g vs 162 g