As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to ultra compacts, mirrorless and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix AW100 and the Coolpix S33) and Fujifilm (such as the XP80 and the FinePix XP60)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), lacks a built-in HDR feature and lacks built-in panoramas.

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
4 months older
$295

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the AW100 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
3 years newer
$148

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP80 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$195

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
3 years newer
$117 - $147

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the XP150)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 28 mm
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S33 and XP150

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S32

Nikon Coolpix S32
2 years newer
$169

Significant advantages of the S32 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S32 (vs the XP150)

  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 28 mm
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S32 and XP150

  • None found

Sony Cybershot TX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10
10 months older
$344

Significant advantages of the TX10 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the TX10 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the TX10 and XP150

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.9 MP) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), is significantly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs super compact (94×57×21 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Sony Cybershot W560

Sony Cybershot DSC-W560
10 months older
$400

Significant advantages of the W560 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much smaller: Super compact (94×56×19 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the W560 (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the W560 and XP150

  • None found

Konica Minolta DiMAGE X60

Placeholder
6 years older
$300

Significant advantages of the X60 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (84×56×22 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the X60 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the X60 and XP150

  • None found

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$180

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 170 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 320 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Smaller: Compact (97×55×27 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a built-in GPS, is waterproof and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.5), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), is much larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs ultra compact (93×56×17 mm)) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Samsung DV150F

Samsung DV150F
1 year newer
$230

Significant advantages of the DV150F (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DV150F (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the DV150F and XP150

  • None found

Sony Cybershot T110

Sony Cybershot DSC-T110
10 months older
$179

Significant advantages of the T110 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the T110 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the T110 and XP150

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a built-in GPS, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs LIVEMOS), is thinner (1.1" vs 1.5") and is slightly lighter (205 g vs 350 g).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't have a screen which flips out.

Sony NEX 7n

Sony NEX 7n
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the 7n (vs the XP150)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the 7n (vs the XP150)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 7n and XP150

  • Fairly small: Compact (111×59×38 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 350 g vs 205 g

Olympus PEN E-PL5

Olympus PEN E-PL5
8 months newer
$448 (body only)
$428 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-PL5 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the E-PL5 (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: LIVEMOS vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the E-PL5 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Mid size (111×64×38 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.1"
  • Light weight: 325 g vs 205 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is newer (january 2012 vs january 2010) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 320 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Samsung HZ35W

Samsung HZ35W
1 year older

Significant advantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the HZ35W and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS
2 years older
$249

Significant advantages of the SX120 IS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX120 IS (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the SX120 IS and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR
similar age
$421

Significant advantages of the F770 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the F770 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the F770 EXR and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR

Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR
4 months older
$239

Significant advantages of the F600 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the F600 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the F600 EXR and XP150

  • Built-in GPS