As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to mirrorless and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the XP80 and the FinePix XP170) and Canon (such as the PowerShot D30 and the PowerShot D20)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), lacks a built-in HDR feature, lacks built-in panoramas, much worse macro focusing (9.0 cm vs 5.0 cm) and is older (january 2012 vs january 2014).

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
3 years newer
$110 - $179

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP80 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$110

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • None found

Canon PowerShot D30

Canon PowerShot D30
2 years newer
$243 - $299

Significant advantages of the D30 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Supports 24p

Significant disadvantages of the D30 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the D30 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Fujifilm FinePix XP30
10 months older
$220

Significant advantages of the XP30 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP30 (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the XP30 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
4 months older
$274

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the AW100 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Nikon Coolpix S32

Nikon Coolpix S32
2 years newer
$111

Significant advantages of the S32 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 5.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S32 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Lower true resolution: 6 MP vs 9.7 MP

common strengths of the S32 and XP150

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a slightly larger screen (2.7" vs 2.5"), has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.9 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs compact (97×55×27 mm)), lacks built-in panoramas and slightly worse macro focusing (9.0 cm vs 7.0 cm).

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Smaller: Compact (97×55×27 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Better macro capability: 7.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a built-in GPS, is thinner (1.1" vs 1.5"), is waterproof and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Sony NEX 5T

Sony NEX 5T
1 year newer
$499 (body only)
$640 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5T (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the 5T (vs the XP150)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 5T and XP150

  • Fairly small: Mid size (111×59×39 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Light weight: 276 g vs 205 g
  • Inexpensive: $499.00 vs $466.45

Sony NEX 7n

Sony NEX 7n
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the 7n (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the 7n (vs the XP150)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 7n and XP150

  • Fairly small: Compact (111×59×38 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.1"
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs large (135×101×146 mm)), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is thinner (1.1" vs 5.7"), is much lighter (205 g vs 808 g) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 41.7x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots).

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR
1 year newer
$435

Significant advantages of the HS50EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 480 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection

Significant disadvantages of the HS50EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger: Large (135×101×146 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Much thicker: 5.7" vs 1.1"
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the HS50EXR and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300
2 years newer
$150 - $168

Significant advantages of the DSC-H300 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9
  • More zoom: 35x vs 5x
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-H300 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger: Large (130×95×122 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DSC-H300 and XP150

  • None found