As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to mirrorless and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the XP90 and the FinePix XP100) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix TS4 and the Lumix TS20)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 250 shots), has a built-in GPS and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and is older (january 2012 vs january 2014).

Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90
4 years newer
$134 - $179

Significant advantages of the XP90 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the XP90 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP90 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP100

Fujifilm FinePix XP100
similar age
$161

Significant advantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP100 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$140

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
4 months older
$290

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the AW100 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Fujifilm FinePix XP200
1 year newer
$422

Significant advantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 360 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Larger: Compact (116×71×30 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP200 and XP150

  • None found

Ricoh WG-20

Ricoh WG-20
2 years newer
$235

Significant advantages of the WG-20 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WG-20 (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the WG-20 and XP150

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 33 mm), has a significantly larger screen (2.7" vs 1.5"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.9 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs compact (97×55×27 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$207

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much shorter battery life: 170 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 320 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older
$100

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Smaller: Compact (97×55×27 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found

Kodak DC3800

Kodak DC3800
11 years older

Significant advantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the DC3800 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Konica Minolta DiMAGE X60

Placeholder
6 years older
$300

Significant advantages of the X60 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (84×56×22 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the X60 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the X60 and XP150

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is newer (january 2012 vs january 2011), has a built-in GPS, is thinner (1.1" vs 1.7"), is slightly lighter (205 g vs 362 g) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs four thirds 17.3x13mm), has a built-in lens and doesn't support an external flash.

Olympus PEN E-PL3

Olympus PEN Lite E-PL3
6 months older
$278 (body only)
$247 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-PL3 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the E-PL3 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the E-PL3 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Mid size (110×64×37 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Light weight: 313 g vs 205 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.1"

Olympus PEN E-PL2

Olympus PEN E-PL2
1 year older
$318 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-PL2 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the E-PL2 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof
  • Heavier: 362 g vs 205 g

common strengths of the E-PL2 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Mid size (115×73×42 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Light weight: 362 g vs 205 g
  • Thin: 1.7" vs 1.1"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 230 shots), is newer (january 2012 vs january 2011) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots).

Samsung HZ35W

Samsung HZ35W
1 year older

Significant advantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the HZ35W and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR
similar age
$680

Significant advantages of the F770 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x

Significant disadvantages of the F770 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly thicker: 1.4" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the F770 EXR and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Nikon Coolpix S3600
2 years newer
$143

Significant advantages of the S3600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (97×58×20 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S3600 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 230 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the S3600 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR
1 year older
$160

Significant advantages of the F550 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the F550 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the F550 EXR and XP150

  • Built-in GPS