As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to mirrorless, travel zooms and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP70 and the XP90) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix W100 and the Coolpix A300)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a significantly longer battery life (300 shots vs 210 shots), has a built-in GPS and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 614k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$172

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90
4 years newer
$159 - $177

Significant advantages of the XP90 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP90 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP90 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
3 years newer
$167

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP80 and XP150

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix AW110

Nikon Coolpix AW110
1 year newer
$199

Significant advantages of the AW110 (vs the XP150)

  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the AW110 (vs the XP150)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the AW110 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$245

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Fujifilm FinePix XP30
10 months older
$350

Significant advantages of the XP30 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP30 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the XP30 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.4), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs compact (97×55×27 mm)), is older (january 2012 vs january 2016) and is slightly heavier (205 g vs 160 g).

Nikon Coolpix A10

Nikon Coolpix A10
4 years newer
$87

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Coolpix A10 and XP150

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100
4 years newer
$125

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Significantly lighter: 119 g vs 205 g

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Coolpix A100 and XP150

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix S3500

Nikon Coolpix S3500
1 year newer
$134

Significant advantages of the S3500 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (97×58×21 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly lighter: 129 g vs 205 g

Significant disadvantages of the S3500 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S3500 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
5 years newer
$159 - $229

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Smaller: Compact (97×55×27 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a built-in GPS, is waterproof and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/500 of a second).

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 20.5 MP), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)
5 years newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9) (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9) (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9) and XP150

  • Fairly small: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Light weight: 269 g vs 205 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.1"

Samsung NX Mini

Samsung NX Mini
2 years newer
$335 (body only)
$487 9-27mm lens

Significant advantages of the Mini (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much longer battery life: 650 shots vs 300 shots
  • Much higher true resolution: 20.5 MP vs 9.7 MP

Significant disadvantages of the Mini (vs the XP150)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Mini and XP150

  • Fairly small: Compact (110×62×23 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Very light: 154 g vs 205 g
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Sony NEX F3

Sony NEX F3
3 months newer
$300 (body only)
$529 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the F3 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much longer battery life: 470 shots vs 300 shots

Significant disadvantages of the F3 (vs the XP150)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the F3 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Mid size (117×67×42 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Light weight: 314 g vs 205 g
  • Thin: 1.7" vs 1.1"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS and is waterproof.

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 18x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 922k dots).

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS
4 years newer
$229 - $230

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much more zoom: 25x vs 5x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX620 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the PowerShot SX620 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix A300

Nikon Coolpix A300
4 years newer
$137

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (96×58×20 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Coolpix A300 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS
3 years newer
$168 - $249

Significant advantages of the SX610 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • More zoom: 18x vs 5x
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SX610 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SX610 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000
9 months newer
$287

Significant advantages of the EX-ZR1000 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 1,000 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the EX-ZR1000 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 1.4" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the EX-ZR1000 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a built-in GPS and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.7), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 19 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 30 fps).

Casio Exilim EX-ZR5000

Casio Exilim EX-ZR5000
4 years newer
$3,506

Significant advantages of the Exilim EX-ZR5000 (vs the XP150)

  • Much better wide angle: 19 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the Exilim EX-ZR5000 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Exilim EX-ZR5000 and XP150

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
4 years newer
$157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and XP150

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 205 g