As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to digicams and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S33 and the Coolpix W100) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP120 and the FinePix XP200)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots), has a built-in GPS and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1500 of a second).

However, on average it doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 360 fps), is older (january 2012 vs march 2013) and slightly shorter exposures (4 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
3 years newer
$111

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the S33 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Fujifilm FinePix XP200
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP200 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
3 years newer
$158

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP80 and XP150

  • None found

Pentax Optio WG-1

Pentax Optio WG-1
1 year older

Significant advantages of the WG-1 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the WG-1 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the WG-1 and XP150

  • None found

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3
1 year older
$825

Significant advantages of the DMC-TS3 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-TS3 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-TS3 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$170

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a significantly longer battery life (300 shots vs 200 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots) and is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs super compact (94×57×21 mm)).

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
5 years newer
$176 - $199

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP150

  • None found

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$221

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.7"
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 170 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 320 HS and XP150

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100
4 years newer
$107

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly lighter: 119 g vs 205 g

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the Coolpix A100 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix A10

Nikon Coolpix A10
4 years newer
$69 - $87

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XP150)

  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the Coolpix A10 and XP150

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to digicam competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 30 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs digital), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.7 MP), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), is older (january 2012 vs august 2016) and is less popular.

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
4 years newer
$157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Mid size (110×67×38 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Light weight: 177 g vs 205 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.1"

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), is significantly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs super compact (95×54×22 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), is older (january 2012 vs january 2016) and is thicker (1.1" vs 0.9").

Nikon Coolpix A300

Nikon Coolpix A300
4 years newer
$137

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (96×58×20 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A300 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Coolpix A300 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix S3700

Nikon Coolpix S3700
3 years newer
$119 - $129

Significant advantages of the S3700 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (96×58×20 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the S3700 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the S3700 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180
4 years newer
$115 - $119

Significant advantages of the PowerShot ELPH 180 (vs the XP150)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (95×54×22 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Significantly lighter: 126 g vs 205 g

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot ELPH 180 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the PowerShot ELPH 180 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000
3 years newer
$169

Significant advantages of the S7000 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the S7000 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 180 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the S7000 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830
2 years newer
$118 - $128

Significant advantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (93×52×23 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W830 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the DSC-W830 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"