As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP60 and the FinePix XP200) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix AW100 and the Coolpix AW110)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.0), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$159

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the XP60 vs the XP150

Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Fujifilm FinePix XP200
1 year newer
$203 - $238

Significant advantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Records high-speed movies: 360 fps vs None
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Larger: Compact 116x71x30 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP200 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the XP200 vs the XP150

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
4 months older
$249

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the AW100 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Fujifilm FinePix XP50
similar age
$275

Significant advantages of the XP50 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP50 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP50 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the XP50 vs the XP150

Fujifilm FinePix XP100

Fujifilm FinePix XP100
similar age
$219

Significant advantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP100 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the XP100 vs the XP150

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-2 iHS

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-2 iHS
1 year newer
$328 - $379

Significant advantages of the TG-2 iHS (vs the XP150)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.0 vs f/3.9
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 610k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the TG-2 iHS (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the TG-2 iHS and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus Tough TG-2 iHS vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and is newer (january, 2012 vs february, 2011).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), is significantly larger (compact 103x71x27 mm vs super compact 98x59x20 mm), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer
$150 - $155

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots
arrow Compare the XP170 vs the XP150

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710
1 year newer
$94

Significant advantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 97x55x20 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W710 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DSC-W710 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Canon IXUS 117 HS

Canon IXUS 117 HS
1 year older

Significant advantages of the IXUS 117 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 93x55x19 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 117 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the IXUS 117 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon IXUS 117 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the XP150

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 25fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 200 shots) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), is significantly larger (compact 103x71x27 mm vs super compact 92x52x21 mm), lacks a built in HDR feature, lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't take 3D photos.

Nikon Coolpix S6300

Nikon Coolpix S6300
similar age
$134

Significant advantages of the S6300 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Smaller: Compact 94x58x26 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S6300 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the S6300 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S6300 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Canon IXUS 132

Canon IXUS 132
1 year newer
$99

Significant advantages of the IXUS 132 (vs the XP150)

  • Faster autofocus: Phase detection vs Contrast detection
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 92x52x21 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 132 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the IXUS 132 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon IXUS 132 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150