As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to travel zooms and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP70 and the FinePix XP60) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S32 and the Coolpix AW100)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), lacks a built in HDR feature, lacks a built in panoramas, doesn't take 3D photos and slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 5 cm).

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$158 - $258

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the XP70 vs the XP150

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$169 - $170

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the XP60 vs the XP150

Nikon Coolpix S32

Nikon Coolpix S32
2 years newer
$107 - $188

Significant advantages of the S32 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S32 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 6 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S32 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S32 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Olympus TG-820

Olympus TG-820 iHS
similar age
$299

Significant advantages of the TG-820 (vs the XP150)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,030k dots vs 230k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the TG-820 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the TG-820 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Fujifilm FinePix XP50
similar age
$200

Significant advantages of the XP50 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP50 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP50 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the XP50 vs the XP150

Panasonic Lumix TS25

Panasonic Lumix TS25
1 year newer
$150 - $180

Significant advantages of the TS25 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the TS25 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the TS25 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Panasonic Lumix TS25 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 33 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.9 MP) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), is slightly larger (compact 103x71x27 mm vs compact 97x55x27 mm), doesn't have a touch screen, lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots
arrow Compare the XP170 vs the XP150

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Smaller: Compact 97x55x27 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus 600 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR

Fujifilm FinePix Z808EXR
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Z808EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 98x59x20 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Z808EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the Z808EXR and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the Z808EXR vs the XP150

Kodak DC3800

Kodak DC3800
11 years older

Significant advantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.7"
  • Lacks video autofocus: None vs Contrast detection
  • Does not take movies: None vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the DC3800 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the Kodak DC3800 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 230 shots) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has significantly less zoom (5x vs 20x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.9), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens).

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SX240 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly more zoom: 20x vs 5x
  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SX240 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SX240 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Fujifilm FinePix JZ100

Fujifilm FinePix JZ100
similar age
$83

Significant advantages of the JZ100 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.9 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Compact 100x56x24 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • Better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the JZ100 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the JZ100 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the JZ100 vs the XP150

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact 103x71x27 mm vs professional size 125x85x106 mm), is thinner (1.1" vs 4.2"), is significantly lighter (205 g vs 565 g), has a built-in GPS and is slightly less expensive ($199.99 vs $426.95).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.3), has way more less zoom (5x vs 60x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 22 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0") and has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots).

Nikon Coolpix P600

Nikon Coolpix P600
2 years newer
$427

Significant advantages of the P600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much more zoom: 60x vs 5x
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the P600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger: Professional size 125x85x106 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 4.2" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the P600 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix P600 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ iHS

Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ iHS
7 months newer
$185

Significant advantages of the SP-820UZ iHS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly more zoom: 40.7x vs 5x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 22 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the SP-820UZ iHS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size 117x78x93 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 3.7" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the SP-820UZ iHS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Inexpensive: $184.70 vs $199.99
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ iHS vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150