As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP70 and the XP80) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix TS5 and the Lumix DMC-TS30)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 210 shots), has a built-in GPS and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs compact (95×62×22 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Panasonic Lumix TS5

Panasonic Lumix TS5
1 year newer
$190

Significant advantages of the TS5 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the TS5 (vs the XP150)

  • Much slower max shutter speed: 1/1300 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the TS5 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$165

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
3 years newer
$129 - $149

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP80 and XP150

  • None found

Sony Cybershot TX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10
10 months older
$289

Significant advantages of the TX10 (vs the XP150)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Much smaller: Ultra compact (96×56×18 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the TX10 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the TX10 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$195

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • None found

Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
1 year older
$245

Significant advantages of the Tough 8010 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly smaller: Compact (95×62×22 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

Significant disadvantages of the Tough 8010 (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the Tough 8010 and XP150

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots), has a built-in GPS and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 26 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.2"), is significantly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs super compact (94×57×21 mm)) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$219

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much shorter battery life: 170 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 320 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer
$245

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots

Nikon Coolpix S2600

Nikon Coolpix S2600
similar age

Significant advantages of the S2600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (94×58×20 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9
  • Better wide angle: 26 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the S2600 (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S2600 and XP150

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is newer (january 2012 vs january 2010), is thinner (1.1" vs 1.3"), is slightly lighter (205 g vs 245 g) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 15x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots).

Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR

Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR
4 months older
$239

Significant advantages of the F600 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the F600 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Thicker: 1.3" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the F600 EXR and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Samsung HZ35W

Samsung HZ35W
1 year older

Significant advantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.2 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the HZ35W and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"