As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to mirrorless and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP70 and the FinePix XP200) and Sony (such as the NEX-5T and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX20)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps), lacks a built in HDR feature and lacks a built in panoramas.

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$100 - $199

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Fujifilm FinePix XP200
1 year newer
$349

Significant advantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 360 fps vs None
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Takes 3D photos

Significant disadvantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Larger: Compact 116x71x30 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP200 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$128 - $169

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
4 months older
$239

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the AW100 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Built-in GPS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix XP100

Fujifilm FinePix XP100
similar age
$139

Significant advantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP100 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Olympus TG-820

Olympus TG-820 iHS
similar age
$238

Significant advantages of the TG-820 (vs the XP150)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,030k dots vs 230k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the TG-820 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the TG-820 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 33 mm), has a slightly larger screen (2.7" vs 2.0"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.9 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), is slightly larger (compact 103x71x27 mm vs super compact 102x51x22 mm), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year older
$229

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 300 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Smaller: Compact 97x55x27 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found

Pentax Optio WPi

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the WPi (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 102x51x22 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the WPi (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Much smaller screen: 2.0" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the WPi and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer
$259

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots

Kodak DC3800

Kodak DC3800
11 years older

Significant advantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • Lacks video autofocus: None vs Contrast detection

common strengths of the DC3800 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm Finepix Z900EXR

Fujfilm Finepix Z900EXR
9 months older
$140

Significant advantages of the Z900EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 2.7"
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Z900EXR (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Z900EXR and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), has a built-in GPS, is thinner (1.1" vs 1.5"), is waterproof and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 16 MP), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Sony NEX-5T

Sony NEX-5T
1 year newer
$349 (body only)
$640 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-5T (vs the XP150)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Shoots RAW

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-5T (vs the XP150)

  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the NEX-5T and XP150

  • Fairly small: Mid size 111x59x39 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • Light weight: 276 g vs 205 g
  • Inexpensive: $349.00 vs $349.00

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 120 shots) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.0), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3.0"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 220 fps).

Nikon Coolpix L610

Nikon Coolpix L610
7 months newer
$127

Significant advantages of the L610 (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the L610 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Much shorter battery life: 120 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the L610 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus VR-340

Olympus VR-340
similar age
$103

Significant advantages of the VR-340 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the VR-340 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the VR-340 and XP150

  • None found

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
similar age
$369

Significant advantages of the SX260 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Supports 24p
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the SX260 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SX260 HS and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS
1 year newer
$171

Significant advantages of the SX270 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SX270 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SX270 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25
1 year newer
$200

Significant advantages of the ZS25 (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the ZS25 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the ZS25 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon ELPH 310 HS

Canon ELPH 310 HS
4 months older
$258

Significant advantages of the 310 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.0 vs f/3.9
  • Supports 24p
  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the 310 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 310 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS