As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to super zooms and travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the XP80 and the FinePix XP70) and Sony (such as the Cybershot TX10 and the Cyber-shot DSC-TX30)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a significantly longer battery life (300 shots vs 210 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs ultra compact (96×56×18 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
3 years newer
$140 - $160

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP80 and XP150

  • Thin: 1" vs 1.1"

Sony Cybershot TX10

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10
10 months older
$179

Significant advantages of the TX10 (vs the XP150)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a touch screen
  • Much smaller: Ultra compact (96×56×18 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the TX10 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the TX10 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.7" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
4 months older
$300

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the AW100 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$140 - $149

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • Thin: 1" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$184

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • Thin: 1" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Fujifilm FinePix XP30
10 months older
$331

Significant advantages of the XP30 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP30 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the XP30 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 33 mm), has a much larger screen (2.7" vs 2"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes significantly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.9 MP).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs compact (97×55×27 mm)), doesn't record movies in 24p, lacks built-in panoramas and is slightly more expensive ($324.99 vs $109.00).

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Great battery life: 300 shots vs 300 shots

Pentax Optio WPi

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the WPi (vs the XP150)

  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (102×51×22 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the WPi (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 320 x 240 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the WPi and XP150

  • None found

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS
1 year older
$236

Significant advantages of the 300 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 300 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 300 HS and XP150

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
3 years newer
$109 - $127

Significant advantages of the Coolpix S33 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix S33 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Worse wide angle: 30 mm vs 28 mm
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the Coolpix S33 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Smaller: Compact (97×55×27 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found

Kodak DC3800

Kodak DC3800
11 years older

Significant advantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.7"
  • Does not take movies: None vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the DC3800 and XP150

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs large (131×91×126 mm)), is thinner (1.1" vs 5"), is significantly lighter (205 g vs 730 g), has a built-in GPS and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has slightly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots).

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR
1 year older
$395

Significant advantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Much wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much better macro capability: 1.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None

Significant disadvantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger: Large (131×91×126 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 5" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the HS20 EXR and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
1 year newer
$239

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much better macro capability: 0.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SX510 HS and XP150

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×70×80 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
  • Light weight: 349 g vs 205 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs compact (110×64×35 mm)), is thinner (1.1" vs 1.4") and is waterproof.

However, on average it has much less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.5), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots).

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700
2 years newer
$197

Significant advantages of the S9700 (vs the XP150)

  • Much more zoom: 30x vs 5x
  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the S9700 (vs the XP150)

  • Thicker: 1.4" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the S9700 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F550 EXR
1 year older
$154

Significant advantages of the F550 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Significantly larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the F550 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the F550 EXR and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Both shoot high resolution HD movies: 1080p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS