As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP70 and the FinePix XP60) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix S32 and the Coolpix AW100)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps), lacks a built in HDR feature, lacks a built in panoramas and doesn't take 3D photos.

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$169 - $219

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the XP70 vs the XP150

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$169 - $175

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the XP60 vs the XP150

Nikon Coolpix S32

Nikon Coolpix S32
2 years newer
$107 - $188

Significant advantages of the S32 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.3 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly better macro capability: 5 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the S32 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly lower true resolution: 6 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S32 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix S32 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Fujifilm FinePix XP200
1 year newer
$203

Significant advantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Takes 3D photos
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP200 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the XP200 vs the XP150

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
4 months older
$129 - $300

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Much better macro capability: 1 cm vs 9 cm
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.0" vs 2.7"
  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the AW100 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Built-in GPS
arrow Compare the Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Fujifilm FinePix XP100

Fujifilm FinePix XP100
similar age
$210

Significant advantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP100 and XP150

  • Each has a built-in flash
arrow Compare the XP100 vs the XP150

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 25fps), has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.9 MP) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), is slightly larger (compact 103x71x27 mm vs compact 97x55x27 mm), lacks a built in panoramas, slightly worse macro focusing (9 cm vs 3 cm) and is slightly heavier (205 g vs 126 g).

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer
$155

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the XP170 vs the XP150

Canon PowerShot A2400 IS

Canon PowerShot A2400 IS
similar age
$85

Significant advantages of the A2400 IS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact 94x54x20 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • Significantly better macro capability: 3 cm vs 9 cm

Significant disadvantages of the A2400 IS (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 25fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 175 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the A2400 IS and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot A2400 IS vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Smaller: Compact 97x55x27 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No image stabilization: None vs Sensor shift

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found
arrow Compare the Olympus Stylus 600 vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is much smaller (compact 103x71x27 mm vs professional size 123x87x106 mm), is thinner (1.1" vs 4.2"), is much lighter (205 g vs 595 g), has a built-in GPS and is slightly less expensive ($212.22 vs $379.00).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.4), has way more less zoom (5x vs 50x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots) and doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps).

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
8 months newer
$399 - $400

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much more zoom: 50x vs 5x
  • Supports 24p
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX50 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger: Professional size 123x87x106 mm vs Compact 103x71x27 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 4.2" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the PowerShot SX50 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS
arrow Compare the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs the Fujifilm FinePix XP150