As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to travel zooms and super zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the XP80 and the FinePix XP170) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix AW120 and the Coolpix AW100)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
3 years newer
$147 - $149

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP80 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Fujifilm FinePix XP50
similar age
$216

Significant advantages of the XP50 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP50 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP50 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$260

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120
2 years newer
$400

Significant advantages of the AW120 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the AW120 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

common strengths of the AW120 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$175

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Fujifilm FinePix XP200
1 year newer
$457

Significant advantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 360 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Larger: Compact (116×71×30 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP200 and XP150

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 33 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.9 MP) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs compact (97×55×27 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Kodak DC3800

Kodak DC3800
11 years older

Significant advantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the DC3800 and XP150

  • None found

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$175

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 170 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 320 HS and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Samsung TL240

Samsung TL240
2 years older

Significant advantages of the TL240 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3.5" vs 2.7"
  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly smaller: Super compact (104×58×20 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the TL240 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly worse wide angle: 31 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the TL240 and XP150

  • None found

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Smaller: Compact (97×55×27 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found

Konica Minolta DiMAGE X60

Placeholder
6 years older
$300

Significant advantages of the X60 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (84×56×22 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the X60 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Significantly smaller screen: 2.5" vs 2.7"

common strengths of the X60 and XP150

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 36 mm), has a built-in GPS, has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is newer (january 2012 vs august 2009) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED).

Samsung HZ35W

Samsung HZ35W
1 year older

Significant advantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the HZ35W and XP150

  • Built-in GPS

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS
2 years older
$249

Significant advantages of the SX120 IS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the SX120 IS (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • No built-in GPS
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS

common strengths of the SX120 IS and XP150

  • None found

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs large (131×91×126 mm)), is thinner (1.1" vs 5"), is significantly lighter (205 g vs 730 g), has a built-in GPS and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), has significantly less zoom (5x vs 30x), has a much narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 461k dots).

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
1 year newer
$239

Significant advantages of the SX510 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the SX510 HS (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly thicker: 3.1" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the SX510 HS and XP150

  • Fairly small: Standard size (104×70×80 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Light weight: 349 g vs 205 g
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR
1 year older
$430

Significant advantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the HS20 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger: Large (131×91×126 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • No built-in GPS
  • Much thicker: 5" vs 1.1"

common strengths of the HS20 EXR and XP150

  • None found