As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to travel zooms, mirrorless and digicams. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP100 and the FinePix XP70) and Nikon (such as the Coolpix AW100 and the Coolpix S33)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots), has a built-in GPS and has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs compact (110×65×23 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (3 fps vs 10 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix XP100

Fujifilm FinePix XP100
similar age
$160

Significant advantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP100 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP100 and XP150

  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100
4 months older
$270

Significant advantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the AW100 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1500 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the AW100 and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33
3 years newer
$83 - $140

Significant advantages of the S33 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the S33 (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the S33 and XP150

  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$172

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • Thin: 1" vs 1.1"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
similar age
$440

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller: Ultra compact (96×56×18 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX20 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX20 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.7" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$200

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • Thin: 1" vs 1.1"

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 15fps), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.9 MP) and has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.1), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs compact (97×55×27 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Konica Minolta DiMAGE X60

Placeholder
6 years older
$300

Significant advantages of the X60 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (84×56×22 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the X60 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 38 mm vs 28 mm
  • Lower resolution movies: 320 x 240 @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the X60 and XP150

  • None found

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$241

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Much shorter battery life: 170 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 320 HS and XP150

  • Full HD (1080p) video: 1080p @ 24fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

Olympus Stylus 600

Placeholder
6 years older

Significant advantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Wider aperture: f/3.1 vs f/3.9
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (97×55×27 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the Stylus 600 (vs the XP150)

  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Lower resolution movies: 480p @ 15fps vs 1080p @ 30fps

common strengths of the Stylus 600 and XP150

  • None found

Fujifilm FinePix XP120

Fujifilm FinePix XP120
5 years newer
$229 - $230

Significant advantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots
  • Shoots faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the FinePix XP120 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the FinePix XP120 and XP150

  • Better sensor types: CMOS vs CMOS

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD), is newer (january 2012 vs january 2010), is slightly lighter (205 g vs 245 g) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has slightly less zoom (5x vs 15x), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3") and has a significantly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots).

Samsung HZ35W

Samsung HZ35W
1 year older
$300

Significant advantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Lower resolution movies: 720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the HZ35W and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it is newer (january 2012 vs june 2011), has a built-in GPS, is thinner (1.1" vs 1.5"), is slightly lighter (205 g vs 313 g) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), has a marginally smaller sensor (1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs four thirds 17.3x13mm), has a built-in lens and doesn't support an external flash.

Olympus PEN E-PL3

Olympus PEN Lite E-PL3
6 months older
$278 (body only)
$276 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-PL3 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the E-PL3 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the E-PL3 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Mid size (110×64×37 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Light weight: 313 g vs 205 g
  • Thin: 1.5" vs 1.1"

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to digicam competitors include: it records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs none), has a significantly wider wide angle lens (28 mm vs 35 mm), has a much larger screen (2.7" vs 1.8"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 5.7 MP).

However, on average it doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs tunnel).

Agfa ePhoto CL30

Placeholder
13 years older

Significant advantages of the CL30 (vs the XP150)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the CL30 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much worse wide angle: 35 mm vs 28 mm

common strengths of the CL30 and XP150

  • None found

Kodak DC210 plus

Kodak DC210 plus
13 years older

Significant advantages of the DC210 plus (vs the XP150)

  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DC210 plus (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.8" vs 2.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the DC210 plus and XP150

  • None found

Nikon Coolpix W100

Nikon Coolpix W100
4 years newer
$157

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP150)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W100 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Worse image stabilization:
    1. Digital
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the Coolpix W100 and XP150

  • Light weight: 177 g vs 205 g
  • Inexpensive: $156.95 vs $253.49