As well as being compared against other waterproofs and compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix XP150 is also often compared to travel zooms. The Fujifilm FinePix XP150's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the FinePix XP170 and the FinePix XP70) and Sony (such as the Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 and the Cybershot TX10)

compared toWaterproof competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other waterproof competitors include: it has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 220 shots) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs ultra compact (96×59×15 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 360 fps) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70
2 years newer
$165

Significant advantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR
  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP70 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP70 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Compact (104×67×26 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80
3 years newer
$138

Significant advantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 10 fps vs 3 fps

Significant disadvantages of the XP80 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 210 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP80 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Compact (104×67×26 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Inexpensive: $138.25 vs $139.27

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Fujifilm FinePix XP50
similar age
$108

Significant advantages of the XP50 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Has in-camera HDR

Significant disadvantages of the XP50 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 300 shots

common strengths of the XP50 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Compact (99×68×26 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • Inexpensive: $107.97 vs $139.27

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60
1 year newer
$194

Significant advantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Takes 3D photos
  • Can create panoramas in-camera
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the XP60 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP60 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Compact (104×67×26 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Fujifilm FinePix XP200
1 year newer
$230

Significant advantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 360 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 920k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the XP200 (vs the XP150)

  • Larger: Compact (116×71×30 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP200 and XP150

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30
1 year newer
$228

Significant advantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the XP150)

  • Much larger screen: 3.3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 230k dots
  • Much smaller: Ultra compact (96×59×15 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-TX30 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Slower max shutter speed: 1/1600 of a second vs 1/2000 of a second

common strengths of the DSC-TX30 and XP150

  • Fairly small: Ultra compact (96×59×15 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to other compact competitors include: it has a significantly larger screen (2.7" vs 1.5"), has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none), takes slightly higher resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 2.1 MP), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and has a slightly longer battery life (300 shots vs 170 shots).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/2.8), is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs super compact (94×57×21 mm)), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 240 fps), doesn't have a touch screen and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Fujifilm FinePix XP170

Fujifilm FinePix XP170
4 months newer
$219

Significant advantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • Can create panoramas in-camera

Significant disadvantages of the XP170 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the XP170 and XP150

  • None found

Canon ELPH 320 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 320 HS
similar age
$174

Significant advantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 240 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.7 vs f/3.9

Significant disadvantages of the 320 HS (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly shorter battery life: 170 shots vs 300 shots
  • No built-in GPS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the 320 HS and XP150

  • Inexpensive: $174.00 vs $139.27

Kodak DC3800

Kodak DC3800
11 years older

Significant advantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.8 vs f/3.9
  • Has a viewfinder: Tunnel vs None

Significant disadvantages of the DC3800 (vs the XP150)

  • Much smaller screen: 1.5" vs 2.7"
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much worse macro capability: 20.0 cm vs 9.0 cm

common strengths of the DC3800 and XP150

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XP150 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a built-in GPS, records higher quality movies (1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps), has a CMOS-family sensor (CMOS vs CCD) and is waterproof.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.9 vs f/3.2), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 920k dots) and is slightly larger (compact (103×71×27 mm) vs super compact (97×58×20 mm)).

Nikon Coolpix S3600

Nikon Coolpix S3600
2 years newer
$90

Significant advantages of the S3600 (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much better macro capability: 2.0 cm vs 9.0 cm
  • Much smaller: Super compact (97×58×20 mm) vs Compact (103×71×27 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the S3600 (vs the XP150)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the S3600 and XP150

  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"
  • Inexpensive: $89.95 vs $139.27

Samsung HZ35W

Samsung HZ35W
1 year older

Significant advantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD

Significant disadvantages of the HZ35W (vs the XP150)

  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the HZ35W and XP150

  • Built-in GPS
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR

Fujifilm Finepix F600 EXR
4 months older
$239

Significant advantages of the F600 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Records high-speed movies: 320 fps vs None
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the F600 EXR (vs the XP150)

  • Thicker: 1.3" vs 1.1"
  • Not waterproof

common strengths of the F600 EXR and XP150

  • Built-in GPS