As well as being compared against other boutiques, the Fujifilm XF10 is also often compared to mirrorless, pro digicams, travel zooms and compacts. The Fujifilm XF10's top rivals come from Ricoh (such as the GR III and the GR II) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) and the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95))

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XF10 compared to other boutique competitors include: it has a touch screen, has an external mic jack, has a slightly longer battery life (330 shots vs 230 shots), uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection) and is newer (july 2018 vs january 2016).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 9 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out, doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs optical) and doesn't support an external flash.

Ricoh GR III

Placeholder
similar age
$900

Significant advantages of the GR III (vs the XF10)

  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Optical vs None

Significant disadvantages of the GR III (vs the XF10)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the GR III and XF10

  • Fairly small: Compact (109×62×33 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.6"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
3 years older
$538 - $598

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the XF10)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/1.7 vs f/2.8
  • Shoots significantly faster: 11 fps vs 6 fps
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the XF10)

  • No touch screen
  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and XF10

  • Fairly small: Mid size (115×66×55 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 393 g vs 279 g
  • Thin: 2.2" vs 1.6"

Nikon Coolpix A

Nikon Coolpix A
5 years older
$748

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A (vs the XF10)

  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A (vs the XF10)

  • No touch screen
  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Coolpix A and XF10

  • Fairly small: Mid size (111×64×40 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Thin: 1.6" vs 1.6"
  • Light weight: 299 g vs 279 g

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
1 year older
$1,050 - $1,299

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the XF10)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2 vs f/2.8
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the XF10)

  • No touch screen

common strengths of the X100F and XF10

  • Fairly small: Standard size (127×75×52 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Have external mic jacks

Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70
2 years older
$1,365

Significant advantages of the X70 (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Supports an external flash

Significant disadvantages of the X70 (vs the XF10)

  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the X70 and XF10

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×44 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Thin: 1.7" vs 1.6"

Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark III

Placeholder
9 months older
$1,099

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G1 X Mark III (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Supports an external flash
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G1 X Mark III (vs the XF10)

  • Much shorter battery life: 200 shots vs 330 shots
  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/2000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second

common strengths of the PowerShot G1 X Mark III and XF10

  • Fairly small: Standard size (115×78×51 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Thin: 2" vs 1.6"

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XF10 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 15.9 MP), has a touch screen, has an external mic jack, uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection) and is newer (july 2018 vs july 2016).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,240k dots), doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 60 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out and has a built-in lens.

Panasonic Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90)

Placeholder
5 months older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has interchangeable lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) (vs the XF10)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 15.8 MP vs 24 MP

common strengths of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) and XF10

  • Fairly small: Compact (107×65×33 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 270 g vs 279 g
  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.6"

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80
2 years older
$493 (body only)
$616 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the DMC-GX80 (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-GX80 (vs the XF10)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 15.8 MP vs 24 MP

common strengths of the DMC-GX80 and XF10

  • Fairly small: Mid size (122×71×44 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Thin: 1.7" vs 1.6"
  • Light weight: 426 g vs 279 g

Olympus OM-D E-M1X

Placeholder
6 months newer
$2,999 (body only)
$3,798 12-40mm lens

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the XF10)

  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 6 fps
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M1X (vs the XF10)

  • Much larger: Large (144×147×75 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Much heavier: 997 g vs 279 g
  • Significantly thicker: 3" vs 1.6"

common strengths of the OM-D E-M1X and XF10

  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Have external mic jacks

Fujifilm X-T2

Fujifilm X-T2
2 years older
$939 - $1,099 (body only)
$1,404 - $1,499 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T2 (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the X-T2 (vs the XF10)

  • No touch screen
  • Significantly heavier: 507 g vs 279 g
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the X-T2 and XF10

  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Have external mic jacks
  • Thin: 1.9" vs 1.6"

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9

Placeholder
5 months older
$784 (body only)
$798 12-60mm lens

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-GX9 (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None
  • Has interchangeable lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-GX9 (vs the XF10)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Lumix DC-GX9 and XF10

  • Fairly small: Mid size (124×72×47 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 407 g vs 279 g
  • Thin: 1.9" vs 1.6"

Olympus OM-D E-M10

Olympus OM-D E-M10
4 years older
$380 - $449 (body only)
$390 - $499 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the E-M10 (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,400k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the E-M10 (vs the XF10)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 15.9 MP vs 24 MP

common strengths of the E-M10 and XF10

  • Fairly small: Mid size (119×82×46 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 396 g vs 279 g
  • Thin: 1.8" vs 1.6"

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XF10 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it has a much larger sensor (APS-C 23.5x15.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm), takes significantly higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 9.7 MP), much higher maximum light sensitivity (51,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a touch screen and has an external mic jack.

However, on average it has a significantly narrower aperture (f/2.8 vs f/1.8), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 20 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out, doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital) and doesn't support an external flash.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA

Placeholder
similar age
$998

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the XF10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA (vs the XF10)

  • None found

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VA and XF10

  • None found

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
2 years older
$532 - $649

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the XF10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the XF10)

  • None found

common strengths of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II and XF10

  • None found

Olympus Tough TG-5

Placeholder
1 year older
$399

Significant advantages of the Tough TG-5 (vs the XF10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Tough TG-5 (vs the XF10)

  • None found

common strengths of the Tough TG-5 and XF10

  • None found

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
6 years older
$403 - $448

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the XF10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the XF10)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and XF10

  • None found

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
1 year older
$369 - $429

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the XF10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II (vs the XF10)

  • None found

common strengths of the PowerShot G9 X Mark II and XF10

  • None found

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
4 years older
$510 - $748

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the XF10)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the XF10)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and XF10

  • None found

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XF10 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.3), takes much higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 9.7 MP), much higher maximum light sensitivity (51,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), has a touch screen and has a much larger sensor (APS-C 23.5x15.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm).

However, on average it doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 24 fps), doesn't have a screen which flips out, has significantly fewer focus points (91 vs 315), is older (july 2018 vs february 2019) and doesn't have a viewfinder (none vs digital).

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95)

Placeholder
7 months newer

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) (vs the XF10)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8

common strengths of the Lumix DC-ZS80 (Lumix DC-TZ95) and XF10

  • Have touch screens
  • Great battery life: 380 shots vs 330 shots

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Placeholder
similar age
$448

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 (vs the XF10)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.8

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 and XF10

  • Have touch screens
  • Inexpensive: $448.00 vs $449.00

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Placeholder
similar age
$338 - $399

Significant advantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the XF10)

  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot SX740 HS (vs the XF10)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 3,200 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Narrower aperture: f/3.3 vs f/2.8

common strengths of the PowerShot SX740 HS and XF10

  • Inexpensive: $338.00 vs $449.00
  • Fast max shutter speeds: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Placeholder
similar age
$1,198

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the XF10)

  • Shoots much faster: 24 fps vs 6 fps
  • Has a flip-out screen
  • Has a viewfinder: Digital vs None

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI (vs the XF10)

  • Much smaller sensor: Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI and XF10

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Capture extremely high resolution images: 20 MP vs 24 MP
  • Have touch screens

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm XF10 compared to compact competitors include: it has a built-in flash, has a much larger screen (3" vs 2"), has a significantly higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 230k dots), takes much higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 9.7 MP) and has a touch screen.

However, on average it is much larger (mid size (113×64×41 mm) vs super compact (65×45×35 mm)), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 30 fps), is thicker (1.6" vs 1.1"), is significantly heavier (279 g vs 160 g) and is not waterproof.

Nikon Coolpix W300

Placeholder
1 year older
$339 - $387

Significant advantages of the Coolpix W300 (vs the XF10)

  • Much smaller: Compact (112×66×29 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Much thinner: 1.1" vs 1.6"
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix W300 (vs the XF10)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • No touch screen
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Coolpix W300 and XF10

  • Wide aperture: f/2.8 vs f/2.8
  • Very fast max shutter speeds: 1/4000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second

Nikon Coolpix A10

Nikon Coolpix A10
2 years older
$87 - $88

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XF10)

  • Much smaller: Compact (96×59×29 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Much lighter: 160 g vs 279 g
  • Much thinner: 1.1" vs 1.6"

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A10 (vs the XF10)

  • Much smaller sensor: 1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm vs APS-C 23.5x15.7mm
  • Has a CCD-family sensor: CCD vs CMOS
  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the Coolpix A10 and XF10

  • None found

GoPro Hero6 Black

Placeholder
9 months older
$498

Significant advantages of the Hero6 Black (vs the XF10)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (65×45×35 mm) vs Mid size (113×64×41 mm)
  • Shoots much faster: 30 fps vs 6 fps
  • Thinner: 1.4" vs 1.6"

Significant disadvantages of the Hero6 Black (vs the XF10)

  • No built-in flash
  • Much smaller screen: 2" vs 3"
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Hero6 Black and XF10

  • Have touch screens
  • You can plug a microphone into both of these