As well as being compared against other mirrorless, the Fujifilm X-T20 is also often compared to boutiques, pro DSLRs, entry-level DSLRs and super zooms. The Fujifilm X-T20's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the X-T100 and the X-T2) and Olympus (such as the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the OM-D E-M10 III)

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to other mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a touch screen, is slightly smaller (mid size (118×83×41 mm) vs prosumer size (134×91×67 mm)), has a built-in GPS, is thinner (1.6" vs 2.6") and is slightly lighter (383 g vs 507 g).

However, on average it it's body is not weather sealed, doesn't shoot as fast continuously (8 fps vs 60 fps), slightly fewer lenses available (58 lenses vs 92 lenses), has a slightly shorter battery life (350 shots vs 430 shots) and slightly shorter exposures (30 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Fujifilm X-T100

Placeholder
1 year newer
$599 - $600 (body only)
$699 - $725 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T100 (vs the X-T20)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the X-T100 (vs the X-T20)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly fewer focus points: 91 vs 325

common strengths of the X-T100 and X-T20

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Have external mic jacks

Fujifilm X-T2

Fujifilm X-T2
6 months older
$1,099 (body only)
$1,428 - $1,499 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T2 (vs the X-T20)

  • Weather sealed
  • Larger viewfinder: 0.76x vs 0.61x

Significant disadvantages of the X-T2 (vs the X-T20)

  • No touch screen
  • No built-in GPS
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the X-T2 and X-T20

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Have external mic jacks

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
4 months older
$1,500 - $1,599 (body only)
$1,749 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II (vs the X-T20)

  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 8 fps
  • Weather sealed
  • Significantly more lenses available: 108 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II (vs the X-T20)

  • Significantly smaller viewfinder: 0.36x vs 0.61x
  • No built-in GPS
  • Fewer focus points: 121 vs 325

common strengths of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and X-T20

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Have external mic jacks

Sony Alpha a7R III

Placeholder
9 months newer
$2,998 - $3,298 (body only)
$3,400 28-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a7R III (vs the X-T20)

  • Significantly higher resolution screen: 1,440k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Much higher true resolution: 42.2 MP vs 24 MP
  • Much longer battery life: 650 shots vs 350 shots

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a7R III (vs the X-T20)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (127×96×74 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Significantly heavier: 657 g vs 383 g

common strengths of the Alpha a7R III and X-T20

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Many focus points: 399 vs 325

Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

Placeholder
7 months newer
$1,163 14-150mm lens

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M10 III (vs the X-T20)

  • Significantly more lenses available: 108 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M10 III (vs the X-T20)

  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the OM-D E-M10 III and X-T20

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300
1 year older
$754 - $898 (body only)
$858 - $998 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the X-T20)

  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the X-T20)

  • No touch screen
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the Alpha a6300 and X-T20

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Many focus points: 425 vs 325
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to boutique competitors include: it slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (51,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out, slightly better viewfinder coverage (100% vs 92%) and has an external mic jack.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
2 years older
$598 - $600

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the X-T20)

  • Shoots faster: 11 fps vs 8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the X-T20)

  • Built-in lens only
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and X-T20

  • Inexpensive: $597.99 vs $799.00
  • Popularity: 96 vs 154

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Fujifilm FinePix X100T
2 years older
$1,000

Significant advantages of the X100T (vs the X-T20)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the X100T (vs the X-T20)

  • Built-in lens only
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100T and X-T20

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Inexpensive: $999.95 vs $799.00
  • Popularity: 27 vs 154

Leica Q (Typ 116)

Leica Q (Typ 116)
1 year older
$3,899 - $4,495

Significant advantages of the Q (Typ 116) (vs the X-T20)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Q (Typ 116) (vs the X-T20)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (130×80×93 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Built-in lens only
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the Q (Typ 116) and X-T20

  • Have touch screens

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
similar age
$1,060 - $1,299

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the X-T20)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the X-T20)

  • Built-in lens only
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100F and X-T20

  • Many focus points: 325 vs 325
  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 17.9 MP), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (8 fps vs 4.5 fps), has a screen which flips out and has much more focus points (325 vs 9).

However, on average it it's body is not weather sealed, has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentaprism), much fewer lenses available (58 lenses vs 220 lenses), has a slightly shorter battery life (350 shots vs 1100 shots) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/4000 of a second vs 1/8000 of a second).

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D
4 years older
$949 - $999 (body only)
$1,449 - $1,999 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 6D (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Weather sealed
  • Much more lenses available: 165 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the 6D (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 11 vs 325
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the 6D and X-T20

  • Fairly small: Professional size (145×111×71 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.8" vs 1.6"
  • Light weight: 770 g vs 383 g

Canon EOS 60D

Canon EOS 60D
6 years older
$2,601 (body only)
$1,499 18-200mm lens

Significant advantages of the 60D (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 220 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/8000 of a second vs 1/4000 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the 60D (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 9 vs 325
  • No touch screen
  • Lower true resolution: 17.9 MP vs 24 MP

common strengths of the 60D and X-T20

  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Professional size (145×106×79 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.6"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a slightly higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 930k dots), slightly larger viewfinder (0.61x vs 0.54x), takes significantly higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 17.9 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (8 fps vs 5 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), it's body is not weather sealed, has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentaprism), much fewer lenses available (58 lenses vs 220 lenses) and has a slightly shorter battery life (350 shots vs 850 shots).

Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D
1 year older
$780 - $999 (body only)
$945 - $1,049 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS 80D (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 220 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the EOS 80D (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 45 vs 325
  • Much larger: Professional size (139×105×79 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.6"

common strengths of the EOS 80D and X-T20

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Fast continuous shooting: 7 fps vs 8 fps
  • Have touch screens

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
6 years older
$708 18-55mm, 55-250mm lenses

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 220 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 9 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 3.7 fps vs 8 fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×80 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)

common strengths of the T3i and X-T20

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Flip-out screens
  • Have external mic jacks

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
3 years older
$500 - $549 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much more lenses available: 230 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 39 vs 325
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×99×76 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Significantly smaller viewfinder: 0.54x vs 0.61x

common strengths of the D5300 and X-T20

  • High resolution screens: 1,037k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Flip-out screens
  • Many focus points: 39 vs 325

Pentax K-3

Pentax K-3
3 years older
$874 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the K-3 (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the K-3 (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 27 vs 325
  • Much larger: Professional size (131×100×77 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1.6"

common strengths of the K-3 and X-T20

  • High resolution screens: 1,037k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Above average viewfinder size: 0.62x vs 0.61x
  • Very fast continuous shooting: 8.3 fps vs 8 fps

Nikon D90

Nikon D90
8 years older
$1,098 (body only)

Significant advantages of the D90 (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 230 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Significantly longer battery life: 850 shots vs 350 shots

Significant disadvantages of the D90 (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 11 vs 325
  • Much lower true resolution: 12.2 MP vs 24 MP
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 930k dots vs 1,040k dots

common strengths of the D90 and X-T20

  • Above average viewfinder size: 0.63x vs 0.61x

Canon Rebel T1i

Canon EOS Rebel T1i
7 years older
$349 (body only)

Significant advantages of the T1i (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 220 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the T1i (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 9 vs 325
  • Much lower true resolution: 15.1 MP vs 24 MP
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 920k dots vs 1,040k dots

common strengths of the T1i and X-T20

  • Very small: Prosumer size (129×98×62 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.4" vs 1.6"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is slightly smaller (mid size (118×83×41 mm) vs professional size (130×93×103 mm)), takes much higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 9.7 MP), much higher maximum light sensitivity (51,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a touch screen and much larger viewfinder (0.61x vs 0.24x).

However, on average it slightly shorter exposures (30 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Olympus Stylus 1s

Olympus Stylus 1s
1 year older
$1,145

Significant advantages of the 1s (vs the X-T20)

  • Significantly longer battery life: 450 shots vs 350 shots
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the 1s (vs the X-T20)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 11.8 MP vs 24 MP
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the 1s and X-T20

  • Very small: Standard size (116×87×57 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Have touch screens
  • Very thin: 2.2" vs 1.6"

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350
similar age

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 (vs the X-T20)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 (vs the X-T20)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Much lower true resolution: 9.7 MP vs 24 MP
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 and X-T20

  • Fairly small: Professional size (130×93×103 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Thin: 4.1" vs 1.6"
  • Light weight: 652 g vs 383 g