As well as being compared against other mirrorless, the Fujifilm X-T20 is also often compared to boutiques, pro DSLRs, entry-level DSLRs and pro digicams. The Fujifilm X-T20's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the X-T100 and the X-T30) and Sony (such as the Alpha a6500 and the Alpha a6300)

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to other mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out, has a built-in GPS and has a built-in flash.

However, on average it it's body is not weather sealed and is older (january 2017 vs september 2017).

Fujifilm X-T100

Placeholder
1 year newer
$499 - $500 (body only)
$569 - $600 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T100 (vs the X-T20)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the X-T100 (vs the X-T20)

  • No built-in GPS
  • Fewer focus points: 91 vs 325

common strengths of the X-T100 and X-T20

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Thin: 1.9" vs 1.6"

Fujifilm X-T30

Placeholder
2 years newer
$899 (body only)
$999 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T30 (vs the X-T20)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 30 fps vs 8 fps

Significant disadvantages of the X-T30 (vs the X-T20)

  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the X-T30 and X-T20

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Fairly small: Standard size (118×83×47 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)

Fujifilm X-T2

Fujifilm X-T2
6 months older
$939 - $1,099 (body only)
$1,404 - $1,499 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T2 (vs the X-T20)

  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.76x vs 0.61x
  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the X-T2 (vs the X-T20)

  • No touch screen
  • No built-in GPS
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the X-T2 and X-T20

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Thin: 1.9" vs 1.6"

Fujifilm X-E3

Placeholder
7 months newer
$649 - $699 (body only)
$949 23mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-E3 (vs the X-T20)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the X-E3 (vs the X-T20)

  • Screen does not flip out
  • No built-in GPS
  • No built-in flash

common strengths of the X-E3 and X-T20

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Fairly small: Mid size (121×74×43 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)

Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500
3 months older
$1,098 (body only)
$1,498 18-135mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the X-T20)

  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6500 (vs the X-T20)

  • Smaller viewfinder: 0.46x vs 0.61x
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the Alpha a6500 and X-T20

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×53 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300
1 year older
$673 - $748 (body only)
$784 - $848 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the X-T20)

  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the Alpha a6300 (vs the X-T20)

  • No touch screen
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the Alpha a6300 and X-T20

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Fairly small: Mid size (120×67×49 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to boutique competitors include: it is slightly smaller (mid size (118×83×41 mm) vs prosumer size (134×101×68 mm)), has an external mic jack, is thinner (1.6" vs 2.7"), is slightly lighter (383 g vs 675 g) and has a built-in GPS.

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 2,100k dots), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (51,200 ISO vs 204,800 ISO), it's body is not weather sealed and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (8 fps vs 12 fps).

Nikon Z6

Placeholder
1 year newer
$1,878 - $1,997

Significant advantages of the Z6 (vs the X-T20)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 2,100k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 204,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the Z6 (vs the X-T20)

  • Significantly larger: Prosumer size (134×101×68 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Built-in lens only
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the Z6 and X-T20

  • Flip-out screens
  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection

Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70
1 year older
$1,389

Significant advantages of the X70 (vs the X-T20)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the X70 (vs the X-T20)

  • Built-in lens only
  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • No built-in GPS

common strengths of the X70 and X-T20

  • Fairly small: Mid size (113×64×44 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Flip-out screens
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it takes significantly higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 17.9 MP), has a touch screen, shoots faster continuously (8 fps vs 5 fps), has a screen which flips out and has much more focus points (325 vs 11).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), slightly smaller viewfinder (0.61x vs 0.70x), it's body is not weather sealed, has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentaprism) and much fewer lenses available (58 lenses vs 220 lenses).

Nikon D610

Nikon D610
3 years older
$899 - $1,497 (body only)
$1,890 - $2,447 28-300mm lens

Significant advantages of the D610 (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Significantly more lenses available: 171 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D610 (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 39 vs 325
  • Much thicker: 3.2" vs 1.6"
  • Much larger: Professional size (141×113×82 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)

common strengths of the D610 and X-T20

  • Light weight: 760 g vs 383 g
  • Built-in flashes

Canon EOS 60D

Canon EOS 60D
6 years older
$562 (body only)

Significant advantages of the 60D (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 220 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Much longer battery life: 1100 shots vs 350 shots

Significant disadvantages of the 60D (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 9 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 5.3 fps vs 8 fps
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.6"

common strengths of the 60D and X-T20

  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Professional size (145×106×79 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Light weight: 755 g vs 383 g

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D
4 years older
$999 - $1,020 (body only)
$1,330 - $1,899 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 6D (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.61x
  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the 6D (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 11 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 4.5 fps vs 8 fps
  • Much thicker: 2.8" vs 1.6"

common strengths of the 6D and X-T20

  • Fairly small: Professional size (145×111×71 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Built-in GPS
  • Very thin: 2.8" vs 1.6"

Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Canon EOS 5D Mark II
8 years older
$2,318 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark II (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.61x
  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark II (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 9 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 3.9 fps vs 8 fps
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1.6"

common strengths of the 5D Mark II and X-T20

  • None found

Nikon DF

Nikon DF
3 years older
$2,215 - $2,747 (body only)
$2,304 - $2,997 50mm lens

Significant advantages of the DF (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much longer battery life: 1400 shots vs 350 shots

Significant disadvantages of the DF (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 39 vs 325
  • Much lower true resolution: 16.2 MP vs 24 MP
  • Shoots much slower: 5.5 fps vs 8 fps

common strengths of the DF and X-T20

  • Fairly small: Professional size (144×110×67 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.6" vs 1.6"
  • Light weight: 765 g vs 383 g

Nikon D700

Nikon D700
8 years older
$1,591 (body only)
$2,277 24-85mm lens

Significant advantages of the D700 (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.72x vs 0.61x
  • Significantly more lenses available: 171 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D700 (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 51 vs 325
  • Much lower true resolution: 12.1 MP vs 24 MP
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 8 fps

common strengths of the D700 and X-T20

  • Built-in flashes

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a significantly higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 230k dots), slightly larger viewfinder (0.61x vs 0.54x), takes much higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 17.9 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (8 fps vs 5 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), it's body is not weather sealed, has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentaprism), much fewer lenses available (58 lenses vs 220 lenses) and has a slightly shorter battery life (350 shots vs 950 shots).

Nikon D7100

Nikon D7100
3 years older
$709 (body only)
$1,097 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7100 (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the D7100 (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 51 vs 325
  • Much larger: Professional size (136×107×76 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3" vs 1.6"

common strengths of the D7100 and X-T20

  • High resolution screens: 1,229k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Above average viewfinder size: 0.61x vs 0.61x
  • Lots of focus points: 51 vs 325

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
3 years older
$397 (body only)
$459 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much more lenses available: 230 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 39 vs 325
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×99×76 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 8 fps

common strengths of the D5300 and X-T20

  • High resolution screens: 1,037k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Flip-out screens
  • Many focus points: 39 vs 325

Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D
1 year older
$872 - $999 (body only)
$870 - $1,149 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS 80D (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 220 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the EOS 80D (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 45 vs 325
  • Much larger: Professional size (139×105×79 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.6"

common strengths of the EOS 80D and X-T20

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Above average viewfinder size: 0.59x vs 0.61x
  • Fast continuous shooting: 7 fps vs 8 fps

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100
6 years older
$329 (body only)
$550 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3100 (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 230 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D3100 (vs the X-T20)

  • Much lower true resolution: 14.2 MP vs 24 MP
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Many fewer focus points: 11 vs 325

common strengths of the D3100 and X-T20

  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection

Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i
6 years older

Significant advantages of the T3i (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 220 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the T3i (vs the X-T20)

  • Much lower true resolution: 17.9 MP vs 24 MP
  • Many fewer focus points: 9 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 3.7 fps vs 8 fps

common strengths of the T3i and X-T20

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Flip-out screens
  • Have external mic jacks

Pentax KP

Pentax KP
similar age
$797 (body only)
$814 50mm lens

Significant advantages of the KP (vs the X-T20)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly higher true resolution: 24.1 MP vs 24 MP
  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the KP (vs the X-T20)

  • Many fewer focus points: 27 vs 325
  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×76 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,040k dots

common strengths of the KP and X-T20

  • Above average viewfinder size: 0.62x vs 0.61x
  • Fast continuous shooting: 7 fps vs 8 fps
  • Flip-out screens

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 20 MP), much higher maximum light sensitivity (51,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a touch screen, has an external mic jack and has a much longer battery life (350 shots vs 220 shots).

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,228k dots), is much larger (mid size (118×83×41 mm) vs compact (102×58×41 mm)), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (8 fps vs 24 fps) and is slightly heavier (383 g vs 298 g).

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
1 year older
$650 - $798

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the X-T20)

  • Much smaller: Compact (102×58×41 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Lighter: 298 g vs 383 g

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the X-T20)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Built-in lens only

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and X-T20

  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 24 MP
  • Flip-out screens
  • Great battery life: 280 shots vs 350 shots

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
3 months older
$998 - $1,010

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the X-T20)

  • Much smaller: Compact (102×58×41 mm) vs Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
  • Shoots significantly faster: 24 fps vs 8 fps
  • Lighter: 299 g vs 383 g

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the X-T20)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Much shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 350 shots
  • Built-in lens only

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and X-T20

  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 24 MP
  • Flip-out screens
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus which is uncommon: Phase detection vs Phase detection