As well as being compared against other mirrorless, the Fujifilm X-T2 is also often compared to pro DSLRs, boutiques and entry-level DSLRs. The Fujifilm X-T2's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the X-T20 and the X-Pro2) and Olympus (such as the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and the OM-D E-M10 II)

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T2 compared to other mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it significantly higher maximum light sensitivity (51,200 ISO vs 25,600 ISO), has a weather sealed body, slightly better viewfinder coverage (100% vs 92%), has slightly more focus points (325 vs 121) and is newer (july 2016 vs november 2014).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,620k dots), doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't have a built-in GPS and doesn't have a built-in flash.

Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20
6 months newer
$799 - $899 (body only)
$999 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T20 (vs the X-T2)

  • Has a touch screen
  • Has a GPS
  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the X-T20 (vs the X-T2)

  • No weather sealing

common strengths of the X-T20 and X-T2

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 51,200 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 24 MP vs 24 MP

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
similar age
$1,499 - $1,999 (body only)
$2,149 14-42mm lens

Significant advantages of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II (vs the X-T2)

  • Shoots much faster: 60 fps vs 14 fps
  • Has a touch screen
  • Significantly more lenses available: 108 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II (vs the X-T2)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Significantly fewer focus points: 121 vs 325

common strengths of the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and X-T2

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Weather sealed
  • Flip-out screens

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2
5 months older
$1,499 - $1,699 (body only)
$2,148 - $2,598 23mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-Pro2 (vs the X-T2)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,620k dots vs 1,040k dots

Significant disadvantages of the X-Pro2 (vs the X-T2)

  • Much less viewfinder coverage: 92% vs 100%
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X-Pro2 and X-T2

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Very good maximum light sensitivity: 51,200 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Weather sealed

Sony Alpha 7 II

Sony Alpha 7 II
1 year older
$1,000 - $1,598 (body only)
$1,410 - $1,798 28-70mm lens

Significant advantages of the 7 II (vs the X-T2)

  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.50x
  • More lenses available: 92 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the 7 II (vs the X-T2)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Significantly fewer focus points: 117 vs 325

common strengths of the 7 II and X-T2

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Weather sealed
  • Capture very high resolution images: 24 MP vs 24 MP

Canon EOS M5

Canon EOS M5
similar age
$929 (body only)
$1,049 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS M5 (vs the X-T2)

  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,620k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the EOS M5 (vs the X-T2)

  • No weather sealing
  • Significantly fewer focus points: 49 vs 325
  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 51,200 ISO

common strengths of the EOS M5 and X-T2

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Capture very high resolution images: 24 MP vs 24 MP
  • Flip-out screens

Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1
2 years older
$599 - $1,299 (body only)
$949 - $1,026 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T1 (vs the X-T2)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the X-T1 (vs the X-T2)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 16.3 MP vs 24 MP
  • Slower autofocus: Hybrid detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the X-T1 and X-T2

  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital
  • Weather sealed
  • Flip-out screens

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T2 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it shoots faster continuously (14 fps vs 6.5 fps), has a screen which flips out, has much more focus points (325 vs 61), is newer (july 2016 vs october 2013) and is significantly smaller (standard size (133×92×49 mm) vs professional size (141×113×82 mm)).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,620k dots), much smaller viewfinder (0.50x vs 0.70x), doesn't have a touch screen and has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentaprism).

Nikon D750

Nikon D750
1 year older
$1,379 - $1,797 (body only)
$1,956 - $2,297 24-120mm lens

Significant advantages of the D750 (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.70x vs 0.50x

Significant disadvantages of the D750 (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 51 vs 325
  • Shoots significantly slower: 6.5 fps vs 14 fps
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.9"

common strengths of the D750 and X-T2

  • Flip-out screens
  • Fairly small: Professional size (141×113×78 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)
  • Thin: 3.1" vs 1.9"

Nikon D500

Nikon D500
6 months older
$1,645 - $1,897 (body only)
$2,456 - $2,497 16-80mm lens

Significant advantages of the D500 (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much higher resolution screen: 2,359k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the D500 (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 153 vs 325
  • Much thicker: 3.2" vs 1.9"
  • Significantly larger: Large (147×115×81 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)

common strengths of the D500 and X-T2

  • Flip-out screens
  • Many focus points: 153 vs 325
  • Fairly small: Large (147×115×81 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D
4 years older
$1,049 - $1,299 (body only)
$1,599 - $1,699 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 6D (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.50x
  • Much more lenses available: 165 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the 6D (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 11 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 4.5 fps vs 14 fps
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the 6D and X-T2

  • Fairly small: Professional size (145×111×71 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.8" vs 1.9"
  • Light weight: 770 g vs 507 g

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Canon EOS 5D Mark III
4 years older
$2,149 - $2,299 (body only)
$2,685 - $2,899 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.50x

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark III (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 61 vs 325
  • Shoots significantly slower: 6 fps vs 14 fps
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the 5D Mark III and X-T2

  • Fairly small: Professional size (152×116×76 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)
  • Thin: 3" vs 1.9"
  • Light weight: 950 g vs 507 g

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
similar age
$2,748 - $3,299 (body only)
$3,399 - $4,199 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.50x

Significant disadvantages of the 5D Mark IV (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 61 vs 325
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Shoots significantly slower: 7 fps vs 14 fps

common strengths of the 5D Mark IV and X-T2

  • Fairly small: Professional size (151×116×76 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)
  • Announced: August 2016 vs July 2016
  • Thin: 3" vs 1.9"

Nikon D610

Nikon D610
2 years older
$1,198 - $1,497 (body only)
$1,900 - $2,447 28-300mm lens

Significant advantages of the D610 (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much larger viewfinder: 0.70x vs 0.50x

Significant disadvantages of the D610 (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 39 vs 325
  • Shoots significantly slower: 6 fps vs 14 fps
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the D610 and X-T2

  • Fairly small: Professional size (141×113×82 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)
  • Light weight: 760 g vs 507 g
  • Inexpensive: $1,198.00 vs $1,599.00

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T2 compared to boutique competitors include: it has a weather sealed body, shoots faster continuously (14 fps vs 6 fps), has a screen which flips out, slightly better viewfinder coverage (100% vs 92%) and has an external mic jack.

However, on average it doesn't have a touch screen, doesn't have an OLED screen (LCD vs OLED), doesn't have a built-in flash and slightly shorter exposures (30 seconds vs 360 seconds).

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F
6 months newer
$1,190 - $1,299

Significant advantages of the X100F (vs the X-T2)

  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the X100F (vs the X-T2)

  • Built-in lens only
  • Shoots significantly slower: 8 fps vs 14 fps
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100F and X-T2

  • Fast continuous shooting: 8 fps vs 14 fps
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Many focus points: 325 vs 325

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Fujifilm FinePix X100T
1 year older
$993

Significant advantages of the X100T (vs the X-T2)

  • Built-in flash

Significant disadvantages of the X100T (vs the X-T2)

  • Shoots much slower: 6 fps vs 14 fps
  • Built-in lens only
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100T and X-T2

  • Thin: 2.1" vs 1.9"
  • Inexpensive: $993.25 vs $1,599.00

Leica Q (Typ 116)

Leica Q (Typ 116)
1 year older
$4,250 - $4,495

Significant advantages of the Q (Typ 116) (vs the X-T2)

  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the Q (Typ 116) (vs the X-T2)

  • Built-in lens only
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the Q (Typ 116) and X-T2

  • Fast continuous shooting: 10 fps vs 14 fps
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Fujifilm GFX 50S

Fujifilm GFX 50S
similar age
$6,499 - $6,500

Significant advantages of the GFX 50S (vs the X-T2)

  • Much higher resolution screen: 2,360k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Has an OLED screen: OLED vs LCD
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the GFX 50S (vs the X-T2)

  • Shoots much slower: 3 fps vs 14 fps
  • Significantly larger: Professional size (148×94×91 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)
  • Built-in lens only

common strengths of the GFX 50S and X-T2

  • Flip-out screens
  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
1 year older
$570 - $648

Significant advantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the X-T2)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-LX100 (vs the X-T2)

  • Built-in lens only
  • Screen does not flip out
  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the DMC-LX100 and X-T2

  • Fast continuous shooting: 11 fps vs 14 fps
  • Inexpensive: $569.90 vs $1,599.00
  • Both have digital viewfinders: Digital vs Digital

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T2 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it shoots faster continuously (14 fps vs 6 fps), has a screen which flips out, has much more focus points (325 vs 45), is newer (july 2016 vs february 2013) and is much smaller (standard size (133×92×49 mm) vs professional size (136×107×76 mm)).

However, on average it has a significantly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a significantly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,228k dots), significantly smaller viewfinder (0.50x vs 0.59x), doesn't have a touch screen and has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentaprism).

Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D
4 months older
$1,099 (body only)
$1,249 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the EOS 80D (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 220 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.59x vs 0.50x

Significant disadvantages of the EOS 80D (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 45 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 7 fps vs 14 fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (139×105×79 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)

common strengths of the EOS 80D and X-T2

  • High resolution screens: 1,040k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Fast continuous shooting: 7 fps vs 14 fps
  • Weather sealed

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200
1 year older
$749 - $997 (body only)
$1,029 - $1,297 18-140mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7200 (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,228k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the D7200 (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 51 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 6 fps vs 14 fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (136×107×76 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)

common strengths of the D7200 and X-T2

  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Weather sealed
  • Lots of focus points: 51 vs 325

Nikon D5500

Nikon D5500
1 year older
$489 (body only)
$549 - $564 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5500 (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much more lenses available: 230 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D5500 (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 39 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 5 fps vs 14 fps
  • No weather sealing

common strengths of the D5500 and X-T2

  • High resolution screens: 1,037k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Flip-out screens
  • Many focus points: 39 vs 325

Nikon D7100

Nikon D7100
3 years older
$629 - $679 (body only)
$949 18-140mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7100 (vs the X-T2)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,229k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Much larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the D7100 (vs the X-T2)

  • Many fewer focus points: 51 vs 325
  • Shoots much slower: 6 fps vs 14 fps
  • Much larger: Professional size (136×107×76 mm) vs Standard size (133×92×49 mm)

common strengths of the D7100 and X-T2

  • High resolution screens: 1,229k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Weather sealed
  • Lots of focus points: 51 vs 325