As well as being compared against other mirrorless, the Fujifilm X-T100 is also often compared to pro digicams, boutiques, entry-level DSLRs and pro DSLRs. The Fujifilm X-T100's top rivals come from Fujifilm (such as the X-T30 and the X-A5) and Sony (such as the Alpha A6000 and the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV)

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T100 compared to other mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has higher quality type of viewfinder (digital vs none), has a touch screen, has an external mic jack, uses fast phase detection autofocus (phase detection vs contrast detection) and is newer (may 2018 vs august 2015).

However, on average it doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 30 fps), slightly fewer lenses available (58 lenses vs 108 lenses), doesn't have a built-in GPS, is slightly heavier (448 g vs 285 g) and is less popular.

Fujifilm X-T30

Placeholder
8 months newer
$899 (body only)
$999 - $1,039 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T30 (vs the X-T100)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 30 fps vs 6 fps
  • Significantly more focus points: 425 vs 91

Significant disadvantages of the X-T30 (vs the X-T100)

  • None found

common strengths of the X-T30 and X-T100

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Thin: 1.9" vs 1.9"

Panasonic Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90)

Placeholder
3 months older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) (vs the X-T100)

  • Significantly more lenses available: 108 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) (vs the X-T100)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90) and X-T100

  • Thin: 1.3" vs 1.9"
  • Each has a built-in flash

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000
4 years older
$379 - $498 (body only)
$479 - $598 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A6000 (vs the X-T100)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the A6000 (vs the X-T100)

  • No touch screen
  • Slower autofocus: Hybrid detection vs Phase detection

common strengths of the A6000 and X-T100

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Thin: 1.8" vs 1.9"
  • Inexpensive: $379.00 vs $499.00

Fujifilm X-A5

Placeholder
3 months older
$499 15-45mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-A5 (vs the X-T100)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the X-A5 (vs the X-T100)

  • No viewfinder: None vs Digital

common strengths of the X-A5 and X-T100

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Thin: 1.6" vs 1.9"

Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20
1 year older
$699 - $749 (body only)
$700 - $999 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the X-T20 (vs the X-T100)

  • Has a GPS
  • More focus points: 325 vs 91

Significant disadvantages of the X-T20 (vs the X-T100)

  • None found

common strengths of the X-T20 and X-T100

  • Have external mic jacks
  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Thin: 1.6" vs 1.9"

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
2 years older

Significant advantages of the E-M10 II (vs the X-T100)

  • Significantly more lenses available: 108 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the E-M10 II (vs the X-T100)

  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Lacks an external mic jack
  • Significantly lower true resolution: 15.9 MP vs 24 MP

common strengths of the E-M10 II and X-T100

  • Thin: 1.9" vs 1.9"
  • Each has a built-in flash

compared toPro digicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T100 compared to pro digicam competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 20 MP), much higher maximum light sensitivity (51,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO), has a touch screen, much larger viewfinder (0.61x vs 0.22x) and has an external mic jack.

However, on average it has a slightly lower resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 1,228k dots), doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 16 fps) and is slightly heavier (448 g vs 213 g).

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
2 years older
$532 - $649

Significant advantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the X-T100)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II (vs the X-T100)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Much shorter battery life: 265 shots vs 430 shots

common strengths of the PowerShot G7 X Mark II and X-T100

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 24 MP

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV
2 years older
$650 - $898

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the X-T100)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 16 fps vs 6 fps

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 IV (vs the X-T100)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Much shorter battery life: 280 shots vs 430 shots

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 IV and X-T100

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 24 MP
  • Flip-out screens

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
1 year older
$998 - $1,010

Significant advantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the X-T100)

  • Shoots much faster: 24 fps vs 6 fps

Significant disadvantages of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V (vs the X-T100)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Much shorter battery life: 220 shots vs 430 shots
  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V and X-T100

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 24 MP
  • Flip-out screens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
1 year older

Significant advantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the X-T100)

  • Significantly longer exposures: 60 seconds vs 30 seconds

Significant disadvantages of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) (vs the X-T100)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Much shorter battery life: 260 shots vs 430 shots

common strengths of the Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) and X-T100

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Extremely good maximum light sensitivity: 25,600 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 24 MP

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
6 years older
$403 - $448

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the X-T100)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 (vs the X-T100)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 6,400 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 and X-T100

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 24 MP
  • Great battery life: 330 shots vs 430 shots

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
4 years older
$510 - $748

Significant advantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the X-T100)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-RX100 III (vs the X-T100)

  • Worse maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 51,200 ISO
  • Slower autofocus: Contrast detection vs Phase detection
  • Lacks an external mic jack

common strengths of the DSC-RX100 III and X-T100

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Capture very high resolution images: 20 MP vs 24 MP
  • Flip-out screens

compared toBoutique competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T100 compared to boutique competitors include: it takes slightly higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 12.7 MP), slightly higher maximum light sensitivity (51,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO), has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out and much better viewfinder coverage (100% vs 92%).

However, on average it doesn't shoot as fast continuously (6 fps vs 11 fps).

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)
3 years older
$895 - $966

Significant advantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the X-T100)

  • Shoots significantly faster: 11 fps vs 6 fps

Significant disadvantages of the D-Lux (Typ 109) (vs the X-T100)

  • No touch screen
  • Built-in lens only
  • Much shorter battery life: 300 shots vs 430 shots

common strengths of the D-Lux (Typ 109) and X-T100

  • Fairly small: Mid size (118×66×55 mm) vs Standard size (121×83×47 mm)
  • Thin: 2.2" vs 1.9"
  • Light weight: 405 g vs 448 g

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Fujifilm FinePix X100T
3 years older
$950

Significant advantages of the X100T (vs the X-T100)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the X100T (vs the X-T100)

  • No touch screen
  • Built-in lens only
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the X100T and X-T100

  • Fairly small: Standard size (127×74×52 mm) vs Standard size (121×83×47 mm)
  • Thin: 2.1" vs 1.9"
  • Light weight: 440 g vs 448 g

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T100 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has a much higher resolution screen (1,040k dots vs 230k dots), slightly larger viewfinder (0.61x vs 0.55x), takes much higher resolution photos (24 MP vs 12.2 MP), has a touch screen and shoots faster continuously (6 fps vs 3.5 fps).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentaprism), much fewer lenses available (58 lenses vs 230 lenses), has a slightly shorter battery life (430 shots vs 970 shots) and doesn't have a built-in GPS.

Nikon D5600

Nikon D5600
1 year older
$468 - $597 (body only)
$500 - $647 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5600 (vs the X-T100)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much more lenses available: 230 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D5600 (vs the X-T100)

  • Many fewer focus points: 39 vs 91
  • Significantly smaller viewfinder: 0.54x vs 0.61x
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×97×70 mm) vs Standard size (121×83×47 mm)

common strengths of the D5600 and X-T100

  • High resolution screens: 1,037k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Have touch screens
  • Flip-out screens

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi
10 years older

Significant advantages of the Rebel XSi (vs the X-T100)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 220 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel XSi (vs the X-T100)

  • Much lower true resolution: 12.2 MP vs 24 MP
  • Much lower resolution screen: 230k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Many fewer focus points: 9 vs 91

common strengths of the Rebel XSi and X-T100

  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection
  • Very small: Prosumer size (129×98×62 mm) vs Standard size (121×83×47 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.4" vs 1.9"

Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400
1 year older
$309 (body only)
$395 - $397 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D3400 (vs the X-T100)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Much more lenses available: 230 lenses vs 58 lenses
  • Significantly longer battery life: 1200 shots vs 430 shots

Significant disadvantages of the D3400 (vs the X-T100)

  • Many fewer focus points: 11 vs 91
  • Significantly lower resolution screen: 921k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×98×76 mm) vs Standard size (121×83×47 mm)

common strengths of the D3400 and X-T100

  • Both use faster phase detection autofocus: Phase detection vs Phase detection

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200
3 years older
$629 - $697 (body only)
$997 - $1,150 18-140mm lens

Significant advantages of the D7200 (vs the X-T100)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,228k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"

Significant disadvantages of the D7200 (vs the X-T100)

  • Much larger: Professional size (136×107×76 mm) vs Standard size (121×83×47 mm)
  • Many fewer focus points: 51 vs 91
  • No touch screen

common strengths of the D7200 and X-T100

  • High resolution screens: 1,228k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Above average viewfinder size: 0.61x vs 0.61x
  • Lots of focus points: 51 vs 91

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300
4 years older
$474 (body only)
$459 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the D5300 (vs the X-T100)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentamirror vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much more lenses available: 230 lenses vs 58 lenses

Significant disadvantages of the D5300 (vs the X-T100)

  • Many fewer focus points: 39 vs 91
  • Much larger: Prosumer size (124×99×76 mm) vs Standard size (121×83×47 mm)
  • Significantly smaller viewfinder: 0.54x vs 0.61x

common strengths of the D5300 and X-T100

  • High resolution screens: 1,037k dots vs 1,040k dots
  • Flip-out screens
  • Many focus points: 39 vs 91

compared toPro DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm X-T100 compared to pro DSLR competitors include: it has a touch screen, has a screen which flips out, has much more focus points (91 vs 11), is newer (may 2018 vs july 2012) and is much smaller (standard size (121×83×47 mm) vs professional size (141×113×78 mm)).

However, on average it has a slightly smaller screen (3" vs 3.2"), significantly smaller viewfinder (0.61x vs 0.71x), it's body is not weather sealed, has a lower quality type of viewfinder (digital vs pentaprism) and significantly fewer lenses available (58 lenses vs 171 lenses).

Nikon D750

Nikon D750
3 years older
$1,149 - $1,297 (body only)
$1,797 24-120mm lens

Significant advantages of the D750 (vs the X-T100)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger screen: 3.2" vs 3"
  • Much longer battery life: 1230 shots vs 430 shots

Significant disadvantages of the D750 (vs the X-T100)

  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.9"
  • No touch screen
  • Significantly fewer focus points: 51 vs 91

common strengths of the D750 and X-T100

  • Flip-out screens
  • Inexpensive: $1,149.00 vs $499.00
  • Light weight: 750 g vs 448 g

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D
5 years older
$999 - $1,499 (body only)
$1,330 - $1,899 24-105mm lens

Significant advantages of the 6D (vs the X-T100)

  • Has an optical viewfinder: Pentaprism vs Digital
  • Significantly larger viewfinder: 0.71x vs 0.61x
  • Weather sealed

Significant disadvantages of the 6D (vs the X-T100)

  • Many fewer focus points: 11 vs 91
  • No touch screen
  • Screen does not flip out

common strengths of the 6D and X-T100

  • Fairly small: Professional size (145×111×71 mm) vs Standard size (121×83×47 mm)
  • Very thin: 2.8" vs 1.9"
  • Inexpensive: $999.00 vs $499.00