 | Very narrow aperture | f/2.8 |  | Quite large | Large (135×107×149 mm) |  | Poor maximum light sensitivity | 3,200 ISO |  | contrast detection autofocus | slower focusing |  | Thick | 5.9" | |  | Slightly smaller than average sensor | 2/3" 8.8x6.6mm |  | Slow continuous shooting | 7 fps |  | Lower true resolution | 12 MP |  | No GPS | Missing geo-tagging |  | Very heavy | 920 g | |
Showing 13 comments
Please note that the X-S1 does have something for HDR effect, Although it is only available at reduced resolution in its EXR cell binning mode, the results are in some aspects better than the normal HDR.
Also, the X-S1has metal body and lens, both of which are weather sealed. I believe that should be mentioned when comparing with other superzooms or other cameras in its price bracket, e.g. the G1X. Finally, a bridge camera that really handles like a well made DSLR. Yes, I tried it.
Source:
http://www.fujifilm.eu/uk/products/digital-cameras/pro-enthusiast/model/x-s1/specifications/
I'm stuck right now between this or a Canon EOS 60D. For me, I want to upgrade from my current HS10, mainly I want a better picture quality, but I have also done some contract work recording for a boxing company, which involved filming for DVD upto 12 fights per night, and I have shot all of them with minimal issues using my HS10 @ 720p, so a video quality boost would also be a great addition for me.. I shoot movie shorts too and his is where the issue comes, I want DSLR quality, but I don't want to give up the massive range of features of the HS10. I like the fact that the XS-1 also supports remote release, and external mic - something which is another big plus for me.. Can anyone offer any advice?
Looking at the other sites, they also state that the image stabilization is optical (i.e., lens-based).