 | Full HD | 1080p @ 24fps |  | No image stabilization | Risk of blur |  | Slow continuous shooting | 6 fps |  | No touch screen | More buttons |  | No weather sealing | Need to shelter it from weather |  | contrast detection autofocus | slower focusing |  | Lacks an external mic jack | Limited to the in-camera mic |  | Old | January 2012 |  | Not so popular | Among snapsort users | |  | High speed movies | Not supported |  | Small viewfinder | 0.24x |  | Poor maximum light sensitivity | 6,400 ISO |  | Lower true resolution | 16 MP |  | Fixed screen | Less flexible |  | Shorter battery life | 300 shots |  | Slightly fewer lenses available | 58 lenses |  | No built-in flash | Professional | |
Showing 4 comments
You say that is slightly large and heavy, but when compared to DSLR cameras offering similar image quality it is actually quite small and lightweight.
Also the price you mention for 'body only' is the amount I paid for body + 35mm lens.
Fail - Try again Snapsort.
I personally own the X100 and I'm still happy with that one. I bought that in December, knowing this one was on the horizon. I personally believe that having a fixed lens on the camera is strangely liberating. There's no need to think about or worry whether that lens would be the best, since you have no choice. It gives me a bit of a peace of mind.
Still, I'd rather go with this X-Pro1 if I didn't already own a DSLR (Nikon D90). I think this one is a far better choice if it's going to be your only camera.