As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix T200 is also often compared to ultra compacts, digicams, compacts, mirrorless and entry-level DSLRs. The Fujifilm FinePix T200's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the VR-360) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-XS1 and the Lumix DMC-FX75)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, compared to other travel zoom competitors the Fujifilm T200 has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), is slightly larger (compact (97×57×28 mm) vs super compact (99×57×19 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and is thicker (1.1" vs 0.7").

Fujifilm FinePix T500

Fujifilm FinePix T500
1 year newer
$473

Significant advantages of the T500 (vs the T200)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift
  • Much thinner: 0.7" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the T500 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the T500 and T200

  • Very small: Super compact (99×57×19 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 1.1"
  • Very light: 141 g vs 151 g

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR
1 year older
$414

Significant advantages of the F70EXR (vs the T200)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Thinner: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the F70EXR (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the F70EXR and T200

  • Very small: Compact (99×59×23 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"
  • Very light: 205 g vs 151 g

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.4 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), is slightly larger (compact (97×57×28 mm) vs ultra compact (94×54×18 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$117

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the T200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and T200

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to digicam competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.4 vs f/3), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots) and is older (february 2011 vs january 2012).

Olympus VR-360

Olympus VR-360
10 months newer

Significant advantages of the VR-360 (vs the T200)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the VR-360 (vs the T200)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the VR-360 and T200

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to compact competitors include: it has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is newer (february 2011 vs june 2010).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.4 vs f/2.7), doesn't have a touch screen, is thicker (1.1" vs 0.8"), is not waterproof and significantly shorter exposures (8 seconds vs 60 seconds).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
8 months older
$545

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX75 (vs the T200)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.2 vs f/3.4
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX75 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FX75 and T200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (103×55×23 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Sony Cybershot DSC-W550

Sony Cybershot DSC-W550
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-W550 (vs the T200)

  • Significantly thinner: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W550 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W550 and T200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (96×57×19 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix XP10

Fujifilm FinePix XP10
1 year older
$160

Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the T200)

  • Waterproof
  • Thinner: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the T200)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the XP10 and T200

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (96×64×23 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is slightly lighter (151 g vs 269 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 16.1 MP).

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Sony Alpha NEX-3N
2 years newer
$573 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-3N (vs the T200)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Supports 24p
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-3N (vs the T200)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the NEX-3N and T200

  • Fairly small: Compact (110×62×35 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 269 g vs 151 g
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 1.1"

Nikon 1 J3

Nikon 1 J3
1 year newer
$199 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J3 (vs the T200)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the J3 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the J3 and T200

  • Fairly small: Compact (101×61×29 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Very light: 224 g vs 151 g
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it is much smaller (compact (97×57×28 mm) vs professional size (132×101×78 mm)), is thinner (1.1" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (151 g vs 555 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 24 MP) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
4 years newer
$549 (body only)
$729 18-55mm, 75-300mm lenses

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the T200)

  • Much higher true resolution: 24 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the T200)

  • Much larger: Professional size (132×101×78 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 1.1"
  • Much heavier: 555 g vs 151 g

common strengths of the T6i and T200

  • None found