As well as being compared against other travel zooms, the Fujifilm FinePix T200 is also often compared to ultra compacts, digicams, compacts, mirrorless and entry-level DSLRs. The Fujifilm FinePix T200's top rivals come from Olympus (such as the VR-360) and Panasonic (such as the Lumix DMC-XS1 and the Lumix DMC-FX75)

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to other travel zoom competitors include: it is slightly lighter (151 g vs 205 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), is much larger (compact (97×57×28 mm) vs super compact (99×57×19 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens), significantly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 12,800 ISO) and is older (february 2011 vs january 2013).

Fujifilm FinePix T500

Fujifilm FinePix T500
1 year newer
$473

Significant advantages of the T500 (vs the T200)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (99×57×19 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Sensor shift

Significant disadvantages of the T500 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the T500 and T200

  • Very small: Super compact (99×57×19 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Very light: 141 g vs 151 g
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR
1 year older
$414

Significant advantages of the F70EXR (vs the T200)

  • Better maximum light sensitivity: 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
  • Significantly smaller: Compact (99×59×23 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)

Significant disadvantages of the F70EXR (vs the T200)

  • Significantly heavier: 205 g vs 151 g

common strengths of the F70EXR and T200

  • Very small: Compact (99×59×23 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Very light: 205 g vs 151 g
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

compared toUltra compact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to ultra compact competitors include: it has a faster max shutter speed (1/2000 of a second vs 1/1600 of a second).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.4 vs f/2.8), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), is much larger (compact (97×57×28 mm) vs ultra compact (94×54×18 mm)), has worse image stabilization (sensor shift vs lens) and slightly lower maximum light sensitivity (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO).

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-XS1
1 year newer
$117

Significant advantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the T200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-XS1 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-XS1 and T200

  • None found

compared toDigicam competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to digicam competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.4 vs f/3), has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots) and is older (february 2011 vs january 2012).

Olympus VR-360

Olympus VR-360
10 months newer

Significant advantages of the VR-360 (vs the T200)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm

Significant disadvantages of the VR-360 (vs the T200)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the VR-360 and T200

  • None found

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to compact competitors include: it has better image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is newer (february 2011 vs june 2010).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower aperture (f/3.4 vs f/2.7), has a significantly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), is much larger (compact (97×57×28 mm) vs super compact (96×57×19 mm)), doesn't have a touch screen and is thicker (1.1" vs 0.8").

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
8 months older
$545

Significant advantages of the DMC-FX75 (vs the T200)

  • Significantly wider aperture: f/2.2 vs f/3.4
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"

Significant disadvantages of the DMC-FX75 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DMC-FX75 and T200

  • Very small: Compact (103×55×23 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Very light: 165 g vs 151 g
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

Sony Cybershot DSC-W550

Sony Cybershot DSC-W550
5 months newer

Significant advantages of the DSC-W550 (vs the T200)

  • Much smaller: Super compact (96×57×19 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Significantly thinner: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Significant disadvantages of the DSC-W550 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the DSC-W550 and T200

  • Very small: Super compact (96×57×19 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Very light: 122 g vs 151 g
  • Thin: 0.8" vs 1.1"

Fujifilm FinePix XP10

Fujifilm FinePix XP10
1 year older
$160

Significant advantages of the XP10 (vs the T200)

  • Smaller: Compact (96×64×23 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Waterproof

Significant disadvantages of the XP10 (vs the T200)

  • Much worse wide angle: 36 mm vs 28 mm
  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the XP10 and T200

  • Very small: Compact (96×64×23 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Very light: 135 g vs 151 g
  • Thin: 0.9" vs 1.1"

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm T200 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (sensor shift vs none) and is slightly lighter (151 g vs 269 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 60fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 921k dots), doesn't record high-speed movies (none vs 1,200 fps) and takes slightly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 16.1 MP).

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Sony Alpha NEX-3N
2 years newer
$573 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the NEX-3N (vs the T200)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Supports 24p
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the NEX-3N (vs the T200)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Sensor shift

common strengths of the NEX-3N and T200

  • Fairly small: Compact (110×62×35 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Light weight: 269 g vs 151 g
  • Very thin: 1.4" vs 1.1"

Nikon 1 J3

Nikon 1 J3
1 year newer
$199 10-30mm lens

Significant advantages of the J3 (vs the T200)

  • Records high-speed movies: 1,200 fps vs None
  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Much higher resolution screen: 921k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the J3 (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the J3 and T200

  • Fairly small: Compact (101×61×29 mm) vs Compact (97×57×28 mm)
  • Very light: 224 g vs 151 g
  • Very thin: 1.1" vs 1.1"

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i
4 years newer
$549 (body only)
$729 18-55mm, 75-300mm lenses

Significant advantages of the T6i (vs the T200)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the T6i (vs the T200)

  • None found

common strengths of the T6i and T200

  • None found