As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix JX405 is also often compared to super zooms, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and mirrorless. The Fujifilm FinePix JX405's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S4100 and the Coolpix A100) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix AX650 and the FinePix HS33 EXR)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, compared to other compact competitors the Fujifilm JX405 is older (february 2011 vs january 2013).

Nikon Coolpix S4100

Nikon Coolpix S4100
similar age
$135

Significant advantages of the S4100 (vs the JX405)

  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the S4100 (vs the JX405)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Digital

common strengths of the S4100 and JX405

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix AX650

Fujifilm FinePix AX650
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the AX650 (vs the JX405)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the AX650 (vs the JX405)

  • Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1400 of a second vs 1/1800 of a second

common strengths of the AX650 and JX405

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (93×60×28 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix JX355

Fujifilm FinePix JX355
similar age

Significant advantages of the JX355 (vs the JX405)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the JX355 (vs the JX405)

  • None found

common strengths of the JX355 and JX405

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.6
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×56×24 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
6 months older
$315

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the JX405)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the JX405)

  • Significantly thicker: 1.2" vs 0.9"
  • Heavier: 193 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the S95 and JX405

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/2.6
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.9"

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100
4 years newer
$100

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the JX405)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the JX405)

  • None found

common strengths of the Coolpix A100 and JX405

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Nikon Coolpix S3300

Nikon Coolpix S3300
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the S3300 (vs the JX405)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital

Significant disadvantages of the S3300 (vs the JX405)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.6

common strengths of the S3300 and JX405

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×58×19 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.9"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm JX405 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (super compact (94×56×23 mm) vs large (131×97×126 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 5") and is significantly lighter (130 g vs 687 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), has worse image stabilization (digital vs sensor shift) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.1 fps vs 11 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix HS33 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS33 EXR
10 months newer

Significant advantages of the HS33 EXR (vs the JX405)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the HS33 EXR (vs the JX405)

  • Much larger: Large (131×97×126 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 5" vs 0.9"
  • Significantly heavier: 687 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the HS33 EXR and JX405

  • Light weight: 687 g vs 130 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm JX405 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.6 vs f/3.6), is slightly smaller (super compact (94×56×23 mm) vs compact (106×59×33 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (130 g vs 215 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has worse image stabilization (digital vs lens), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (february 2011 vs january 2015) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1800 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second).

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SX220 HS (vs the JX405)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/1800 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SX220 HS (vs the JX405)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (106×59×33 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.9"
  • Significantly heavier: 215 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the SX220 HS and JX405

  • Fairly small: Compact (106×59×33 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 215 g vs 130 g

Canon PowerShot IXUS 170

Canon PowerShot IXUS 170
3 years newer
$371

Significant advantages of the IXUS 170 (vs the JX405)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital

Significant disadvantages of the IXUS 170 (vs the JX405)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.6 vs f/2.6

common strengths of the IXUS 170 and JX405

  • Very small: Compact (100×58×23 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 141 g vs 130 g

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm JX405 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (digital vs none), is much smaller (super compact (94×56×23 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (130 g vs 580 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 18 MP) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Canon EOS 1200D

Canon EOS 1200D
3 years newer
$385 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the 1200D (vs the JX405)

  • Much higher true resolution: 18 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the 1200D (vs the JX405)

  • Much larger: Professional size (130×100×78 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.9"
  • Much heavier: 480 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the 1200D and JX405

  • None found

Canon EOS 700D

Canon EOS 700D
2 years newer
$532 (body only)
$598 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the 700D (vs the JX405)

  • Much higher true resolution: 17.9 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the 700D (vs the JX405)

  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.9"
  • Much heavier: 580 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the 700D and JX405

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm JX405 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (digital vs none) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.4").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 19.8 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000
2 years newer
$498 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A5000 (vs the JX405)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Supports 24p
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the A5000 (vs the JX405)

  • None found

common strengths of the A5000 and JX405

  • Fairly small: Compact (110×63×36 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very light: 210 g vs 130 g
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 0.9"