As well as being compared against other compacts, the Fujifilm FinePix JX400 is also often compared to super zooms, travel zooms, entry-level DSLRs and mirrorless. The Fujifilm FinePix JX400's top rivals come from Nikon (such as the Coolpix S4100 and the Coolpix A100) and Fujifilm (such as the FinePix AX650 and the FinePix HS30 EXR)

compared toCompact competitors

Generally, compared to other compact competitors the Fujifilm JX400 is older (february 2011 vs january 2013).

Nikon Coolpix S4100

Nikon Coolpix S4100
similar age
$135

Significant advantages of the S4100 (vs the JX400)

  • Has a touch screen

Significant disadvantages of the S4100 (vs the JX400)

  • No image stabilization: None vs
    1. Digital

common strengths of the S4100 and JX400

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×57×20 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix AX650

Fujifilm FinePix AX650
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the AX650 (vs the JX400)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the AX650 (vs the JX400)

  • Much worse wide angle: 33 mm vs 28 mm
  • Significantly slower max shutter speed: 1/1400 of a second vs 1/1800 of a second

common strengths of the AX650 and JX400

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Compact (93×60×28 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Thin: 1.1" vs 0.9"

Fujifilm FinePix JX350

Fujifilm FinePix JX350
similar age

Significant advantages of the JX350 (vs the JX400)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the JX350 (vs the JX400)

  • None found

common strengths of the JX350 and JX400

  • Wide aperture: f/2.6 vs f/2.6
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (94×56×24 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)

Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95
6 months older
$315

Significant advantages of the S95 (vs the JX400)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital

Significant disadvantages of the S95 (vs the JX400)

  • Significantly thicker: 1.2" vs 0.9"
  • Heavier: 193 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the S95 and JX400

  • Wide aperture: f/2 vs f/2.6
  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Thin: 1.2" vs 0.9"

Nikon Coolpix A100

Nikon Coolpix A100
4 years newer
$100

Significant advantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the JX400)

  • None found

Significant disadvantages of the Coolpix A100 (vs the JX400)

  • None found

common strengths of the Coolpix A100 and JX400

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×59×20 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.8" vs 0.9"

Nikon Coolpix S3300

Nikon Coolpix S3300
1 year newer

Significant advantages of the S3300 (vs the JX400)

  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital

Significant disadvantages of the S3300 (vs the JX400)

  • Narrower aperture: f/3.5 vs f/2.6

common strengths of the S3300 and JX400

  • Each has a built-in flash
  • Fairly small: Super compact (95×58×19 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.7" vs 0.9"

compared toSuper zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm JX400 compared to super zoom competitors include: it is significantly smaller (super compact (94×56×23 mm) vs large (131×97×126 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 5") and is significantly lighter (130 g vs 687 g).

However, on average it has a significantly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 24 mm), has a slightly smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), has worse image stabilization (digital vs sensor shift) and doesn't shoot as fast continuously (1.1 fps vs 11 fps).

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR
10 months newer

Significant advantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the JX400)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Significantly better wide angle: 24 mm vs 28 mm
  • Has an external mic jack

Significant disadvantages of the HS30 EXR (vs the JX400)

  • Much larger: Large (131×97×126 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 5" vs 0.9"
  • Significantly heavier: 687 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the HS30 EXR and JX400

  • Light weight: 687 g vs 130 g

compared toTravel zoom competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm JX400 compared to travel zoom competitors include: it has a slightly wider aperture (f/2.6 vs f/3.6), is slightly smaller (super compact (94×56×23 mm) vs compact (106×59×33 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 1.3") and is slightly lighter (130 g vs 215 g).

However, on average it has a slightly narrower wide angle lens (28 mm vs 25 mm), has worse image stabilization (digital vs lens), has a CCD-family sensor (CCD vs CMOS), is older (february 2011 vs january 2015) and has a slower max shutter speed (1/1800 of a second vs 1/3200 of a second).

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS
similar age

Significant advantages of the SX220 HS (vs the JX400)

  • Has a CMOS-family sensor: CMOS vs CCD
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital
  • Much faster max shutter speed: 1/3200 of a second vs 1/1800 of a second

Significant disadvantages of the SX220 HS (vs the JX400)

  • Significantly larger: Compact (106×59×33 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 1.3" vs 0.9"
  • Significantly heavier: 215 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the SX220 HS and JX400

  • Fairly small: Compact (106×59×33 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 1.3" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 215 g vs 130 g

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS
3 years newer
$158

Significant advantages of the ELPH 170 IS (vs the JX400)

  • Significantly better wide angle: 25 mm vs 28 mm
  • Better image stabilization:
    1. Lens
    vs
    1. Digital

Significant disadvantages of the ELPH 170 IS (vs the JX400)

  • Significantly narrower aperture: f/3.6 vs f/2.6

common strengths of the ELPH 170 IS and JX400

  • Very small: Compact (100×58×23 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very thin: 0.9" vs 0.9"
  • Very light: 141 g vs 130 g

compared toEntry-level DSLR competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm JX400 compared to entry-level DSLR competitors include: it has image stabilization (digital vs none), is much smaller (super compact (94×56×23 mm) vs professional size (133×100×79 mm)), is thinner (0.9" vs 3.1") and is much lighter (130 g vs 580 g).

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 30fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a much lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 1,040k dots), takes much lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 18 MP) and doesn't have a touch screen.

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5
3 years newer
$337 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the JX400)

  • Much higher true resolution: 18 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None
  • Much higher resolution screen: 460k dots vs 230k dots

Significant disadvantages of the Rebel T5 (vs the JX400)

  • Much larger: Professional size (130×100×78 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.9"
  • Much heavier: 480 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the Rebel T5 and JX400

  • None found

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i
2 years newer
$1,095 (body only)
$539 - $549 18-55mm lens

Significant advantages of the T5i (vs the JX400)

  • Much higher true resolution: 17.9 MP vs 9.7 MP
  • Much higher resolution screen: 1,040k dots vs 230k dots
  • Has a viewfinder: Pentamirror vs None

Significant disadvantages of the T5i (vs the JX400)

  • Much larger: Professional size (133×100×79 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Much thicker: 3.1" vs 0.9"
  • Much heavier: 580 g vs 130 g

common strengths of the T5i and JX400

  • None found

compared toMirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors

Generally, some of the advantages of the Fujifilm JX400 compared to mirrorless interchangeable-lens competitors include: it has image stabilization (digital vs none) and is thinner (0.9" vs 1.4").

However, on average it records lower quality movies (720p @ 30fps vs 1080p @ 24fps), has a much smaller screen (2.7" vs 3"), has a slightly lower resolution screen (230k dots vs 460k dots), takes significantly lower resolution photos (9.7 MP vs 19.8 MP) and doesn't record movies in 24p.

Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000
2 years newer
$498 16-50mm lens

Significant advantages of the A5000 (vs the JX400)

  • Much larger screen: 3" vs 2.7"
  • Supports 24p
  • Has a flip-out screen

Significant disadvantages of the A5000 (vs the JX400)

  • None found

common strengths of the A5000 and JX400

  • Fairly small: Compact (110×63×36 mm) vs Super compact (94×56×23 mm)
  • Very light: 210 g vs 130 g
  • Thin: 1.4" vs 0.9"